cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/60365167
Case 1
Moderator carrotcypher says "removed for paywall." When asked about which rule this breaks, receives no response. The post is then locked.
Case 2
Same as the first, except this time there is no paywall - the link is to a freely accessible advocate.com page.
It is censored with no explanation.
Case 3
Same as Case 2, moderators censor the post and leave no explanation.
Case 4
This one is finally given a removal reason: a rule that does not exist in the sidebar, and seems to have nothing to do with the post ("Your post has been removed for being too specific to a company or single product.")
But in a censored comment, the OP of the post says they received a different removal reason:
This time, other people notice the censorship and the nonsensical nature of the official removal reason.
Since this removal, there has been no further post of this news in r/privacy. Sources tell me the moderators refuse to explain their decision.
Do you know what they have against Graphene?
Basically the head dev if graphene was a dick, but tbh so is Torvalds and I'm not about to stop using linux. That dev stepped down as head anyway iirc, still works on the project (which is good, cause he's good) but just isn't the face anymore (which is good, cause he is a dick lmao.)
Some whiny BS as I remember, the mods were just being typical reddit mods.