this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
387 points (99.0% liked)

BuyFromEU

3227 readers
393 users here now

Welcome to BuyFromEU - A community dedicated to supporting European-made goods and services!

We also invite you to subscribe to:

Logo generated with mistral le chat Banner by Christian Lue on unsplash.com

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 

kudos to s h i k o r a

edit: complete list is here (4 pages long)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tjoa@feddit.org 12 points 6 days ago

I like how Switzerland tried to please Donald trump to avoid the tariffs like a lil bitch and now got hit even more.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

You can instantly tell that this whole shit was concocted by an idiot who has zero connection to reality, because Portugal doesn't have the same percentage as any other Balkan country.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] nuko147@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

I think nothing. The guys are more idiots than i thought. They simply put an equation that balances their exports and imports from other countries. Many say that they simply asked AI for that. Idiots are unpredictable.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Is Turkey part of EU, but got a lesser rate?

[–] nuko147@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago

Nope they are not. Also it is very funny that they consider EU a country, while every country inside EU has different amount of exports and imports with the USA.

[–] giuseppe@lemmy.world 75 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Lol. There are seriously 185 counties across the four pages of that list. And Russia is not one of them.

This is out of the 193 sovereign states that the UN recognizes. Wild

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 31 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Several of the entries on the list are not independent countries (French Guiana, for example, has a different rate to the EU despite being part of France and the EU) and one doesn’t even have a human population (Heard & McDonald Islands, an Australian territory near Antarctica)

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Why such high tariffs on Moldova? They’re a poor nation.

[–] nuko147@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have updated the post with a link to full list. Vietnam got 46% lmao.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

for (c in countries) {
  c.tariffs = Math.random();
}

[–] elvith@feddit.org 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Sadly there are many reports, that it's just


for (c in countries) { 
    c.tariffs = math.max(10,
        (c.exportsTo(us) - c.importFrom(us)) /
        (c.exportsTo(us)*2))
}

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 16 points 1 week ago

It's the trade deficit masquerading as a tarrif - Moldova sells more than it buys from America because American stuff is expensive and Moldova can't afford to buy American goods so it gets hit with "reciprocal" tariffs on it's exports.

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I read somewhere that the theory is countries that don't purchase ad much from the us as the us buys from said country got more tarrifs because in trumps mind they're losing money.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Reporters could recreate the entire list exactly by asking ChatGPT/Grok/Claude/Gemini what would be an easy way to tariff other nations.
The tariff % is simply the US trade deficit with that country divided by imports from it.

https://www.theverge.com/news/642620/trump-tariffs-formula-ai-chatgpt-gemini-claude-grok

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

It's not a theory, they published the formula, that's just straight up what it is.

[–] PurpleSkull@lemm.ee 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Switzerland was so proud of avoiding the face eating leopard for so long. But the leopard found out how delectable Swiss faces are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

10% is the default, no? Does that not include Russia? Not that there should be any trading at the moment.

[–] nuko147@lemm.ee 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Russia is not on the list. The bare minimum is 10% from the list. Also the whole list from BBC

Edit: holy fuck i didn't see that there are 4 pages of that list. . .

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] nuko147@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They have sanctions on them, so i do not know what is their current situation in trade with them. I bet that is gonna change though.

[–] soularpanic@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Hard to believe the sanctions had any actual impact as uninhabited islands are having tariffs leavied against them.

[–] nuko147@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

USA has become the clown of the world.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 50MYT@aussie.zone 11 points 1 week ago

Mexico, Canada, Russia and Belarus missing from the list

Mexico and Canada have agreements already.

The trump org said that Russia and Belarus are embargo anyway so no trading with them is why they were not there.

[–] mcv@friendica.opensocial.space 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I just heard the reasons for these tariffs is probably based directly on the ratio between trade deficit compared to total trade. A tiny island where almost nobody lives and that never trades with the US got into the highest tariff category because some American bought $3 million worth of sea food in 2024.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

User tomi000@lemmy.world gave me the best explanation when I asked what the rationale is for Trump's tariffs:

His logic is: I walk into a store and buy a hat for 10$ and sell them a shoe for 7$. This means the store ripped me off by 3$. To counter this, I will add a tarriff of (3/10)/2 = 15% to all business I do with this store so they dont dare sell me anything in the future.

[–] psivchaz@reddthat.com 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Okay but you're missing the point: I want to believe that this is all a highly planned and funded Russian op because the alternative is that half the country elected someone so incredibly dumb WITHOUT a conspiracy.

Oh, there's definitely a conspiracy. Not a big-C Conspiracy, but several smaller ones.

One obvious one is Putin who wants to weaken NATO and therefore the EU and the US, and has been sponsoring extremist parties and spreading fake news and pro-Russian talking points across social media.

Another one is the Republicans have been demonizing Democrats for 4 decades, since Newt Gingrich decided they shouldn't be compromising with Dems anymore, but demonizing them, turning US politics toxic.

Conservative media and especially Rupert Murdoch have supported both of the previous ones and pushed them sometimes even more extreme. Not sure if Murdoch is actually pro-Putin, but several of his outlets have done a lot of heavy lifting for Putin. And of course undermining democracy and supporting oligarchy.

The Tech Bros want even more deregulation. They believe in their digital utopia, at least for themselves, and they want free reign to do whatever they want and shape the world in their image.

And the Evangelicals have basically been lead astray by all of these but especially the Republicans, who lead them by the nose ever since the 1960s when the Evangelicals were upset about desegregation. Grifters have turned it into a for-profit religion that bears no resemblance to Christianity anymore, but makes for a perfect vehicle for all sorts of weird politics, including all of the above.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

I too would want to belive that Putin is highly planned and funded American(or Chineese) op because the alternative is that half the country elected someone so incredibly senile WITHOUT a conspiracy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkGamer@fedia.io 16 points 1 week ago

It's clear who Trump works for.

[–] ladel@feddit.uk 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He really has it in for Lichtenstein

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mcv@friendica.opensocial.space 10 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Does this mean Russia doesn't get any tariffs at all? Also, why higher tariffs for Switzerland than the EU, but lower for the UK?

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 16 points 1 week ago

It seems like they have, generally speaking, made up the numbers by dividing the total value of imports vs exports with that country. So if the USA imports $200,000,000 of stuff from Switzerland and exports $100,000,000, they're saying that that means Switzerland has 50% effective tariffs against America (no, this does not make any goddamn sense, but it appears to be what they're doing), and then "reciprocating" with half of that number, so 25% tariffs on Switzerland. 10% is the floor which they're applying no matter what... except for on Russia, apparently

The UK presumably imports more American stuff, proportionate to exports, than the EU does

[–] nuko147@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

Russia is sanctioned (for now at least). For UK and other countries, probably they played some games on closed doors, during the white house visiting. We will see, i don't gonna be surprised if UK buys military equipment from USA (or more that they were planning of).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Numuruzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Do you think they meant for this to look like a scorpion about to fuck shit up

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments