this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
1047 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

68305 readers
4267 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] diemartin@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 hours ago (2 children)
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Slavishly Follow the Fascist Government's Lead

[–] Orangutanion@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 1 points 39 minutes ago

WHO ARE YOU I AM FROM ANCIENT GREECE

[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 34 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

It's almost impressive how quickly the whole of the business world capitulated to Donald Trump.

[–] Sizing2673@lemmy.world 2 points 20 minutes ago

This is what's fucking shitty about this

Every company and every politician and every person who bends over so willingly IS THE PROBLEM

It's like they announce their regime and these idiots roll out the red carpets immediately ready be the first company to suck the government off

If they all stood their ground, it would buy more time

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 23 points 1 hour ago

It's too hard to change anything, but only if it's progressive policies. Fascist policies can be implemented immediately.

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip -3 points 15 minutes ago

I would appreciate it if we could just get rid of this dumbass "hate speech" rule.

[–] carrion0409@lemm.ee 15 points 2 hours ago

First reddit now youtube. Welcome to the tech broligarchy

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 42 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Man this whole anticipatory compliance with the fascist regime shit is fucking awful

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Welcome to how the world has always worked and always will. There's gin to help wash the black pill down.

[–] FatTony@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

Probably because no one is actually using any gender identity based bigotry any more. So they might as well just remove it, it saves space. /s

[–] mooncake@lemm.ee 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's time to boycott Google as well now hu? Already ditched their search engine and moved to kagi

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 27 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

While I hate Google, this seems like one of those much ados over nothing. They specifically mention 'sex, gender, or sexual orientation', which to most reasonable people would cover gender identity.

[–] patatahooligan@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

"Gender" means nothing without context. By a MAGAs definition of gender this policy doesn't protect trans people, for example. We don't know how this rule will be interpreted in practice. Even if you don't consider the intent behind making this change, this is objectively a weaker guarantee of protection than what we had with "gender identity and expression".

This is not a legal contract, it's a general guideline for users about what is or isn't acceptable. The intent and spirit of the terms are clear, the only question is whether Google will enforce them not. If the enforcement is crappy, like what Facebook is famous for, it doesn't matter a damn what exact terminology they use in the guidelines.

[–] gamer@lemm.ee 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What matters is how this affects enforcement.

It doesn't. It's not like this page gets used internally. They have their own internal guidelines for that.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 15 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You still think things are run by reasonable people?!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fxdave@lemmy.ml 32 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not in favor of YouTube, but what exactly missing here?

[–] Chocobofangirl@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It used to say gender expression and identity. If it doesn't, that's a deliberate decision that could cause enforcement calls like 'well that's not your REAL gender so this isn't harassment'.

[–] fxdave@lemmy.ml 0 points 44 minutes ago

I mean.. It's already over-specified compared to others: "sex, gender or sexual orientation". It'd be equally right to criticize religion for why don't they write "belief, spiritualism, religion", and to include identity, and expression.

They should just write "sex stuff", and everyone is happy.

load more comments
view more: next ›