this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
167 points (99.4% liked)

News

28350 readers
5065 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

U.S. District Judge James Bredar in Baltimore issued a preliminary injunction Tuesday night that protects those workers while the lawsuit continues.

“Only states have sued here, and only to vindicate their interests as states,” Bredar wrote. “They are not proxies for the workers.”

The order requires the 18 agencies originally named in the lawsuit to follow the law in conducting any future reductions in force. Bredar has now added the Defense Department and the Office of Personnel Management to that number.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That matters only if there's enforcement. Otherwise, judges are just old men in robes ranting and raving about the way the world used to work.

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 2 points 17 hours ago

That a first step. Nobody will spontaneously defend your right. You have to do it yourself and associate to other people wanting to defend their rights too

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

And what will this judge do when the Trump administration completely ignores his ruling? Because Trump is definitely gonna throw a tantrum and call this judge “an active judge” as an excuse to ignore his ruling and do whatever the hell he wants anyway.

There is only one way to stop Trump from doing what he’s doing, and it is not by asking nicely.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm tired of seeing this kind of defeatist response to good news. That judge is doing a good job.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This isn't defeatism, it's realism.

We're already knee-deep in the constitutional crisis. Admitting that there's a good chance that Trump will simply ignore the rulings against him isn't discouraging, it's radicalizing.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 7 points 23 hours ago

Admitting that there's a good chance that Trump will simply ignore the rulings against him isn't discouraging, it's radicalizing.

That's not what the above commentor was doing though. They were criticizing the judge for doing their job. That's also known as "Obeying in advance." Just because they'll break the law doesn't mean it's not important to uphold the structure.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 5 points 1 day ago

Unless you’re hallucinating, I never mentioned the word “defeat”. In fact, I painted a very clear path towards victory.

[–] LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

I agree with you and appreciate the call out and the positivity. Too many new accounts on Lemmy lately that are commenting negative and defeatist things on positive headlines.