I think they just don't understand that we don't pay the tariffs, the country it's coming from pays the tariffs. Right! Right? Guys...
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
It takes a special kind of stupid to schedule a recession.
He starts to remind me of Liz Truss, afraid he won't leave office as soon as she did tho
Trump already outlasted the lettuce, unfortunately.
... even though the fat asshole would never eat one.
I'd rather have the lettuce as president.
Liz lasted like 2 weeks or something.
A scaramucci
Who?
Bro looks like a cartoon version of himself converted back to a real person.
It's obvious that this is exactly what they want to do. The question is why.
Is this just a great ploy to buy the dip?
Implode the world to bring about Jebus.
Not sure if joking but yes exactly.
And daddy Putin wants it.
Not for his and his oligarch's aims
Even though I know that I am personally going to feel the pain from this, it does bring me a little bit of satisfaction watching the rich assholes who put Trump in office in exchange for tax cuts losing their net worth because it's all tied to their stock.
Those tax breaks aren't going to matter when they don't have any money.
The poor people voted for tax cuts for the rich because they might be rich one day.
Turns out the rich people should've voted for social safety nets because they might be poor one day.
The rich people will buy up these stocks and become even more proportionally wealthy than the poor because of it.
@OutlierBlue @Chainweasel the rich have forgotten they should vote for social safety nets because otherwise the poor have nothing to lose.
Goldman Sachs have blinders on. This is gonna hit hard tomorrow
My only guess is that they remain conservative in their estimates until we start reaching into a second or third quarter of GDP losses.
Liberate deez nuts.
Wasn't it already 35% before today?