this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
243 points (97.3% liked)

Firefox

19320 readers
388 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Uh oh. The reason gmail is profitable is because they see all your emails and sell your profile to others.

I dont want Mozilla doing that.

[–] Niquarl@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 hours ago

In the article it says they will have no ads and no data mining. The user will pay for the service.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

Oh, bother.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 13 hours ago

Sounds like good news. I just hope they won't put some bullshit in the TOS saying they can scan your emails to train their AI.

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 25 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

I really hope this doesn't impact the client too significantly. A substantial part of why I use Thunderbird is to keep out of these "ecosystems".

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

I think the purpose is to find a source of revenue so that they don't have to ruin their product. There's a lot of potential good here, in addition to the unfortunately undeniable potential bad.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 51 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Thunderbird is funded by donations and operates under the MZLA banner.

These articles today are doing a disservice to the Thunderbird team who work independently of Mozilla afaik.

[–] Niquarl@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

As written in the article

Moz doesn't contribute financially to Thunderbird's development, according to Sipes, and whatever revenue the Thunderbird team generates will go straight into furthering its work.

[–] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Independently of the Mozilla team, yes.

However, my understanding is that, if Thunderbird were to become ~~hugely~~ profitable, the Mozilla Foundation would benefit financially, though indirectly.

The organizational structure:

  • Mozilla Foundation = parent organization
  • MZLA Technologies Corporation (which owns Thunderbird) is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation
  • Mozilla Corporation (which produces Firefox) is also a subsidiary of the Foundation

When Thunderbird moved to MZLA Technologies Corporation in January 2020, this was specifically done to allow Thunderbird to "collect revenue through partnerships and non-charitable donations".

As a wholly owned subsidiary, any profits generated by MZLA would ultimately flow back to its parent organization, the Mozilla Foundation.

In the end, that revenue would probably go to all the smart investments we've seen the Mozilla Foundation make over the previous years. 🙄

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You're right, but I think "hugely profitable" is probably optimistic - I'd expect something to the level of Proton or Fastmail. Fine, but not a big money maker like Firefox is.

[–] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

Sure, applies to getting to any level of profitability.

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Few know how things are structured. Or more importantly, how it could be restructured later.

[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 8 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

These articles purport to be written by journalists though. Fact checking is meant to be a staple of the job description.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] madjo@feddit.nl 61 points 1 day ago (4 children)

They’re looking for a sustainable revenue stream because the Google subsidy is bound to dry up.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 12 hours ago

Article says revenue from this won't fund firefox.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 1 day ago (4 children)

if they manage to make it an actual good product and also not host it in the US, they might even be able to pull it off

[–] Niquarl@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

They are thinking of having the user choose the juridiction. So far their testing is hosted in the EU apparently.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Just be Proton without the support for fascism. Easy.

[–] cortex7979@lemm.ee 1 points 15 hours ago

fascism

Huh? What did I miss

[–] arakhis_@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

isnt the proton ceo praising trump publicly?

[–] NKBTN@feddit.uk 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Congratulated him on day 1, I don't think said anything since

[–] arakhis_@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago

which means its ok for you. I cant follow

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

I'd need to be able to choose a non-US server too. And even then, all the major tech firms breached EU laws by later transferring data back to the US. But if I had to trust an American company Mozilla would be among the better choices.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago

Isn't Mozilla a US company?

Somehow I don't see them leaving the place where they do business

[–] beyond@linkage.ds8.zone 11 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Thunderbird and Firefox are developed by separate companies (both under the Mozilla Foundation). Thunderbird is funded through donations. Firefox is funded through (among other sources, such as Pocket and advertisements) the Google search deal. As far as I know it's not legally feasible (or even possible) for the Firefox money to go to Thunderbird or vice versa.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 11 points 20 hours ago

Would be great if they create a real competition to proton mail

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 day ago (4 children)

when they said they would look for a way to monetize firefox i was worried, but this is actually great if they make a good service.

[–] d3lta19@lemmy.ca 3 points 19 hours ago

I agree. I would love to see a competitor to gmail/office365 that respects privacy

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

They are really not selling me with their recent antics

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fireshell@lemmy.ml 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

A big step forward for Mozilla on the "mail" side. Diversification of income. Advertising in the browser was not to everyone's liking, but you have to make money somehow. On the private mail service with the transfer of large files in the form of cryptocontainer... They'll make a normal one the clients for Android and iOS... Link to Mozilla Account... This is the right way, one of them. And see integration with various approaches to trusted AI (trusted exactly, without transferring user data to the cloud). That's the right way, too. A very appropriate response to tectonic changes in the external environment.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ah yes the move from software developer to service provider. Smells like en(shit)tification.

Lets hope they do this right unlike everyone else.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Smells like en(shit)tification.

What are the parenthesis here for? Without it would be "smells like entification"??

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I’m cynical and already looking at forks

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 1 points 13 hours ago

Good for you, but those forks too owe their existence (among other things) to the donations (and down the road subscriptions) to Thunderbird.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] network_switch@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Always felt like this needed to happen for long time now. I guess now better than never. Got to figure out a business model. Reselling Mullvad as Firefox VPN was a start. I feel like everything that Proton does, Firefox should be doing but with a Linux file manager application

[–] jackalope@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is great news!

People should check out thunderbird appointments if they haven't.

[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I hope they’re going to keep the late 90s theme from Thunderbird. Maybe a dancing baby gif.

Have you used Thunderbird lately?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago

What do you consider 90's?

I use Thunderbird and it is anything but 90's

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›