this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
248 points (97.3% liked)

Firefox

19338 readers
472 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 51 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Thunderbird is funded by donations and operates under the MZLA banner.

These articles today are doing a disservice to the Thunderbird team who work independently of Mozilla afaik.

[–] Niquarl@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

As written in the article

Moz doesn't contribute financially to Thunderbird's development, according to Sipes, and whatever revenue the Thunderbird team generates will go straight into furthering its work.

[–] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Independently of the Mozilla team, yes.

However, my understanding is that, if Thunderbird were to become ~~hugely~~ profitable, the Mozilla Foundation would benefit financially, though indirectly.

The organizational structure:

  • Mozilla Foundation = parent organization
  • MZLA Technologies Corporation (which owns Thunderbird) is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation
  • Mozilla Corporation (which produces Firefox) is also a subsidiary of the Foundation

When Thunderbird moved to MZLA Technologies Corporation in January 2020, this was specifically done to allow Thunderbird to "collect revenue through partnerships and non-charitable donations".

As a wholly owned subsidiary, any profits generated by MZLA would ultimately flow back to its parent organization, the Mozilla Foundation.

In the end, that revenue would probably go to all the smart investments we've seen the Mozilla Foundation make over the previous years. 🙄

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're right, but I think "hugely profitable" is probably optimistic - I'd expect something to the level of Proton or Fastmail. Fine, but not a big money maker like Firefox is.

[–] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Sure, applies to getting to any level of profitability.

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Few know how things are structured. Or more importantly, how it could be restructured later.

[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These articles purport to be written by journalists though. Fact checking is meant to be a staple of the job description.

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just for argument’s sake, it’s easier to change the behavior of one mismanaged foundation than the broken news cycles

[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thunderbird is not a Mozilla project. It is independent of Mozilla including it's financing and has been for several years now.

My understanding is MZLA was set up so Thunderbird could accept donations and manage it's own finances independently of Mozilla. There have been no allegations anywhere that MZLA has been mismanaged.

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

few people know that or will understand it; it’s been tarnished by the foundation.

If I were managing thunderbird, I would do a rebrand because I am not the first or last person to make that mistake ; there are tens of millions of me

[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The journalists who published these articles had an opportunity to educate their readers by not spreading misinformation and by not misrepresenting Thunderbird's relationship to Mozilla.

The issue here isn't the disdain anyone has for Mozilla (although that might be yours). The issue is the misrepresentation of Thunderbird as a Mozilla project by news media.

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

I am influenced by both and control none, bobbing along the waves of misinformation and mismanagement like a cork in the ocean .

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Thunderbird really needs to be a totally separate thing

Mozilla is the new Google at this point. Google set the bar in hell so everyone else can get away with a lot.