this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
674 points (99.6% liked)

politics

22575 readers
4231 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk gave away two $1 million checks in Wisconsin ahead of a key state Supreme Court election, prompting backlash after one winner was revealed as Nicholas Jacobs, chair of the Wisconsin College Republicans.

Critics called the giveaway “rigged,” fueling suspicion about Musk’s political motives.

Though Musk claimed the money wasn’t tied to voting, his deleted post initially suggested it rewarded voters. Wisconsin law bans vote-motivating payments.

Musk has invested nearly $20 million to support conservative candidate Brad Schimel.

all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This man is an existential threat to democracy

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Or maybe its money and we should get rid of it and just work for the pleasure of it and get everything we need for free :|
...
sorry.. my repressed communist soul came out, I'll repress it back in.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 53 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

The USA would need a reformation and political purge after Trump to become a first world democratic country again. And put a lot of these motherfuckers into prison for life via special tribunals. Including half the supreme court lol

Not going to happen without a lot of blood unfortunately, they already have too much power. America is heading to civil war.

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Yeah. At this point nothing short of an armed revolutionary takeover is gonna cause anything to move back. And that's not happening either.

There is no "becoming a first world democracy again". That ship has sailed. Fascism doesn't have term limits. And we are in the thick of it now.

I think one thing the rest of the "first world democracies" missing is that the imperial core doesn't just go Fascist alone. It drages the rest of you down with it. Dont get comfortable watching from a distance and shaking your head at the "silly Americans". Your democracy's are next.

[–] o1011o@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

We don't need back, we need forward, and a lot of us aren't interested in giving into doomerism. It is still the time for peaceful resistance and that might still work. It might not, and if it doesn't the time for widespread destruction of property and civil disobedience will come and that might work, and then soon after the time for armed resistance will come and that might work. If it all fails we can at least make them hurt and show the world that we don't take fascism lying down. It's dark times but we don't get out of them by giving up.

Hell, there's a chance we come out of this better than we were before, and not just because the bar is so fucking low. We (americans) might find our passion for liberty and justice again and we might find our courage and we might express our decades of resentment against the creeping in of inequality by swinging to the left with new and more inclusive rights and protections for working class people. That'd be nice but even if we can't have a good ending it's still the right thing to do to fight fascism with everything we have.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As always America is at forefront of the world, and where the USA leads Europe will follow! 😒

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Think of it less about nation states and more about where the concentration of capital is and it makes a lot more sense.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

I think by now it's mostly driven by social media which is international in algorithm, access to influence and partly in content. Or useful propaganda is repackaged by european politicians and influences. Monkey see monkey do. And we only have 3 international news agencies, so only really 3 news papers.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Make that most, if not all of the supreme court

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 178 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I called this. It was always rigged.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 93 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Wasn't this always known? Musk's defense when he was sued for this in the 24 pres election was that it specifically wasn't a lottery system and that the winner isn't random but is vetted and picked before announcement, which is evidently legal.

E: Source

Quote:

In court Monday, Musk’s lawyers acknowledged that the super PAC isn’t picking winners “by chance.”

“There is no prize to be won,” Musk lawyer Chris Gober said, and the winners “are not chosen by chance.” Therefore, it is not a lottery, Gober argued.

Instead, Gober said the so-called “prize” is actually compensation for serving as a spokesperson for the super PAC – and the recipients of the $1 million “are selected based on their suitability to serve as spokesperson for America PAC.” They “earn” the million dollars as payment for their work.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I feel like implying it's a lottery that you can win should still be seriously punished but then I remember which reality we're in and that nothing matters if you're rich

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 19 points 1 day ago

You can do whatever the fuck you want, as long as you have an expensive enough lawyer who will "correct" you, when people point out what you're doing is illegal.

It's by design though. None of this is because of loopholes. What is happening is because the people in power wanted it to be possible.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

If it's payment for work, it best be taxed like it is.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

He did this in Pennsylvania

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Why would this be any different from the last time he did this?

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

Well DUH. You don't want one of the "poors" to get the money.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Did the SC make bribes legal?

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Everything is legal until someone has the balls to enforce it not being illegal.

I understand what you mean, but that isn't "legal", it's just injustice

[–] Hellahunter@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not necessarily a brag when it’s blatantly obvious, it’s like saying I told you the sun would rise tomorrow. Lol

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

When was I bragging? Just stating the obvious, champ.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago

I’m totally cool with doxxing all these invertebrates’ personal info

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (4 children)

How is this still not illegal?

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It is unquestionably illegal. For your reference, here are the pertinent Wisconsin Bribery Statutes.

This leaves me to question how much the various judges that allowed this to proceed were ~~payed~~ paid to ignore the laws as written. Assuming it wasn't just fear of reprisal from MAGA terrorists that kept them from stopping it.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Might not be the judges yet. A prosecutor has to charge them first. Then a judge can ignore it

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

The WI AG went to court to block him from doing the give away and the judge said no. He then appealed that and the appeals court refused to stop it. He then went to the WI Supreme Court who also refused to stop it. Judges have already been ignoring it.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But legality hardly matters for the rich

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The laws written down are merely the highwater mark of how democratic a society is in theory, or they are the lowwater mark of what the ruling class has been allowed to get away with in public in terms of brutally oppressing the lower classes, but they never represent a true accountability of the rich, merely a record of the struggle between the ruling class and the rest of society, a reading of the balance of scales at any given moment that the rich no matter what can still bat away ildly like an annoying fly in their face unless we take the fundamental issues with capitalism and wealth inequality seriously.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Think of it like this. His money is so dirty that here is an argument as to whether it is safe for humans.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Nothing is illegal if you're rich enough.

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

The rule of law in the United States collapsed a long time ago, and at this point only exists to enforce violence on poors.

I guess it's technically not bribery if you only defrauded people into thinking they were going to receive a bribe. /s

[–] rice@lemmy.org 5 points 1 day ago

They're practicing for how their voting will work

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Shitty and totally legal. Slaps something So much fuckin freedom in this baby.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Ending hunger, one judge at a time

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

You want to support this guy, you better get used to seeing rigged elections.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

It’s not a lottery. They just pick the winner based on their alignment with their values so the can use that person in their political aspirations. That’s what happened in previous “giveaways”

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is obviously laughable as a corruption move. Will it bring consequences ?

[–] preludeofme@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

As soon as Teslas are fully self driving