this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
441 points (91.4% liked)

Technology

68244 readers
4249 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 246 points 1 week ago (15 children)

people tend to become dependent upon AI chatbots when their personal lives are lacking. In other words, the neediest people are developing the deepest parasocial relationship with AI

Preying on the vulnerable is a feature, not a bug.

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I kind of see it more as a sign of utter desperation on the human's part. They lack connection with others at such a high degree that anything similar can serve as a replacement. Kind of reminiscent of Harlow's experiment with baby monkeys. The videos are interesting from that study but make me feel pretty bad about what we do to nature. Anywho, there you have it.

[–] graphene@lemm.ee 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And the amount of connections and friends the average person has has been in free fall for decades...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] glibg@lemmy.ca 136 points 1 week ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 107 points 1 week ago (13 children)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Zip2@feddit.uk 88 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (22 children)

I couldn’t be bothered to read the article, so I got ChatGPT to summarise it. Apparently there’s nothing to worry about.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 86 points 1 week ago (8 children)

But how? The thing is utterly dumb. How do you even have a conversation without quitting in frustration from it's obviously robotic answers?

But then there's people who have romantic and sexual relationships with inanimate objects, so I guess nothing new.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 56 points 1 week ago (5 children)

If you're also dumb, chatgpt seems like a super genius.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 44 points 1 week ago

In some ways, it's like Wikipedia but with a gigantic database of the internet in general (stupidity included). Because it can string together confident-sounding sentences, people think it's this magical machine that understands broad contexts and can provide facts and summaries of concepts that take humans lifetimes to study.

It's the conspiracy theorists' and reactionaries' dream: you too can be as smart and special as the educated experts, and all you have to do is ask a machine a few questions.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 32 points 1 week ago (7 children)

How do you even have a conversation without quitting in frustration from it’s obviously robotic answers?

Talking with actual people online isn’t much better. ChatGPT might sound robotic, but it’s extremely polite, actually reads what you say, and responds to it. It doesn’t jump to hasty, unfounded conclusions about you based on tiny bits of information you reveal. When you’re wrong, it just tells you what you’re wrong about - it doesn’t call you an idiot and tell you to go read more. Even in touchy discussions, it stays calm and measured, rather than getting overwhelmed with emotion, which becomes painfully obvious in how people respond. The experience of having difficult conversations online is often the exact opposite. A huge number of people on message boards are outright awful to those they disagree with.

Here’s a good example of the kind of angry, hateful message you’ll never get from ChatGPT - and honestly, I’d take a robotic response over that any day.

I think these people were already crazy if they’re willing to let a machine shovel garbage into their mouths blindly. Fucking mindless zombies eating up whatever is big and trendy.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 64 points 1 week ago (3 children)

those who used ChatGPT for "personal" reasons — like discussing emotions and memories — were less emotionally dependent upon it than those who used it for "non-personal" reasons, like brainstorming or asking for advice.

That’s not what I would expect. But I guess that’s cuz you’re not actively thinking about your emotional state, so you’re just passively letting it manipulate you.

Kinda like how ads have a stronger impact if you don’t pay conscious attention to them.

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (11 children)

AI and ads... I think that is the next dystopia to come.

Think of asking chatGPT about something and it randomly looks for excuses* to push you to buy coca cola.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know a few people who are genuinely smart but got so deep into the AI fad that they are now using it almost exclusively.

They seem to be performing well, which is kind of scary, but sometimes they feel like MLM people with how pushy they are about using AI.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most people don't seem to understand how "dumb" ai is. And it's scary when i read shit like that they use ai for advice.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

People also don't realize how incredibly stupid humans can be. I don't mean that in a judgemental or moral kind of way, I mean that the educational system has failed a lot of people.

There's some % of people that could use AI for every decision in their lives and the outcome would be the same or better.

That's even more terrifying IMO.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 46 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wake me up when you find something people will not abuse and get addicted to.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tisktisk@piefed.social 46 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I plugged this into gpt and it couldn't give me a coherent summary.
Anyone got a tldr?

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 67 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s short and worth the read, however:

tl;dr you may be the target demographic of this study

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Lol, now I'm not sure if the comment was satire. If so, bravo.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Skua@kbin.earth 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Based on the votes it seems like nobody is getting the joke here, but I liked it at least

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HappinessPill@lemmy.ml 44 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (16 children)

Do you guys remember when internet was the thing and everybody was like: "Look, those dumb fucks just putting everything online" and now is: "Look at this weird motherfucker that don't post anything online"

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gamer@lemm.ee 42 points 1 week ago

That is peak clickbait, bravo.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)

TIL becoming dependent on a tool you frequently use is "something bizarre" - not the ordinary, unsurprising result you would expect with common sense.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee 36 points 1 week ago (7 children)

now replace chatgpt with these terms, one by one:

  • the internet
  • google
  • facebook
  • instagram
  • tiktok
  • reddit
  • lemmy
  • their cell phone
  • news media
  • television
  • radio
  • podcasts
  • junk food
  • money
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] jamie_oliver@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I knew a guy I went to rehab with. Talked to him a while back and he invited me to his discord server. It was him, and like three self trained LLMs and a bunch of inactive people who he had invited like me. He would hold conversations with the LLMs like they had anything interesting or human to say, which they didn't. Honestly a very disgusting image, I left because I figured he was on the shit again and had lost it and didn't want to get dragged into anything.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

I don’t know how people can be so easily taken in by a system that has been proven to be wrong about so many things. I got an AI search response just yesterday that dramatically understated an issue by citing an unscientific ideologically based website with high interest and reason to minimize said issue. The actual studies showed a 6x difference. It was blatant AF, and I can’t understand why anyone would rely on such a system for reliable, objective information or responses. I have noted several incorrect AI responses to queries, and people mindlessly citing said response without verifying the data or its source. People gonna get stupider, faster.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Chastity2323@midwest.social 25 points 1 week ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›