this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
439 points (91.5% liked)

Technology

68066 readers
4237 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zip2@feddit.uk 86 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (22 children)

I couldn’t be bothered to read the article, so I got ChatGPT to summarise it. Apparently there’s nothing to worry about.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 44 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago

Something bizarre is happening to media organizations that use 'clicks' as a core metric.

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago

Its too bad that some people seem to not comprehend all chatgpt is doing is word prediction. All it knows is which next word fits best based on the words before it. To call it AI is an insult to AI... we used to call OCR AI, now we know better.

[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] M33@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It depends: are you in Soviet Russia ?

[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

In the US, so as of 1/20/25, sadly yes.

[–] glibg@lemmy.ca 132 points 4 days ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] gamer@lemm.ee 41 points 3 days ago

That is peak clickbait, bravo.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Negative IQ points?

[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 245 points 4 days ago (15 children)

people tend to become dependent upon AI chatbots when their personal lives are lacking. In other words, the neediest people are developing the deepest parasocial relationship with AI

Preying on the vulnerable is a feature, not a bug.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

And it's beyond obvious in the way LLMs are conditioned, especially if you're used them long enough to notice trends. Where early on their responses were straight to the point (inaccurate as hell, yes, but that's not what we're talking about in this case) today instead they are meandering and full of straight engagement bait - programmed to feign some level of curiosity and ask stupid and needless follow-up questions to "keep the conversation going." I suspect this is just a way to increase token usage to further exploit and drain the whales who tend to pay for these kinds of services, personally.

There is no shortage of ethical quandaries brought into the world with the rise of LLMs, but in my opinion the locked-down nature of these systems is one of the most problematic; if LLMs are going to be the commonality it seems the tech sector is insistent on making happen, then we really need to push back on these companies being able to control and guide them in their own monetary interests.

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 64 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I kind of see it more as a sign of utter desperation on the human's part. They lack connection with others at such a high degree that anything similar can serve as a replacement. Kind of reminiscent of Harlow's experiment with baby monkeys. The videos are interesting from that study but make me feel pretty bad about what we do to nature. Anywho, there you have it.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] HappinessPill@lemmy.ml 44 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (14 children)

Do you guys remember when internet was the thing and everybody was like: "Look, those dumb fucks just putting everything online" and now is: "Look at this weird motherfucker that don't post anything online"

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I remember when internet was a place

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Remember when people used to say and believe "Don't believe everything you read on the internet?"

I miss those days.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 105 points 4 days ago (13 children)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 39 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (12 children)

TIL becoming dependent on a tool you frequently use is "something bizarre" - not the ordinary, unsurprising result you would expect with common sense.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee 36 points 4 days ago (7 children)

now replace chatgpt with these terms, one by one:

  • the internet
  • google
  • facebook
  • instagram
  • tiktok
  • reddit
  • lemmy
  • their cell phone
  • news media
  • television
  • radio
  • podcasts
  • junk food
  • money
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 days ago (4 children)

chatbots and ai are just dumber 1990s search engines.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jamie_oliver@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I knew a guy I went to rehab with. Talked to him a while back and he invited me to his discord server. It was him, and like three self trained LLMs and a bunch of inactive people who he had invited like me. He would hold conversations with the LLMs like they had anything interesting or human to say, which they didn't. Honestly a very disgusting image, I left because I figured he was on the shit again and had lost it and didn't want to get dragged into anything.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 51 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I know a few people who are genuinely smart but got so deep into the AI fad that they are now using it almost exclusively.

They seem to be performing well, which is kind of scary, but sometimes they feel like MLM people with how pushy they are about using AI.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 32 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Most people don't seem to understand how "dumb" ai is. And it's scary when i read shit like that they use ai for advice.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 46 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Wake me up when you find something people will not abuse and get addicted to.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago

i can feel it too when I use it. that is why i use it only for trivial things if at all.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 85 points 4 days ago (20 children)

But how? The thing is utterly dumb. How do you even have a conversation without quitting in frustration from it's obviously robotic answers?

But then there's people who have romantic and sexual relationships with inanimate objects, so I guess nothing new.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] EaterOfLentils@lemmy.world 65 points 4 days ago (1 children)

New mental illness boutta drop.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 64 points 4 days ago (14 children)

those who used ChatGPT for "personal" reasons — like discussing emotions and memories — were less emotionally dependent upon it than those who used it for "non-personal" reasons, like brainstorming or asking for advice.

That’s not what I would expect. But I guess that’s cuz you’re not actively thinking about your emotional state, so you’re just passively letting it manipulate you.

Kinda like how ads have a stronger impact if you don’t pay conscious attention to them.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (7 children)

I don’t know how people can be so easily taken in by a system that has been proven to be wrong about so many things. I got an AI search response just yesterday that dramatically understated an issue by citing an unscientific ideologically based website with high interest and reason to minimize said issue. The actual studies showed a 6x difference. It was blatant AF, and I can’t understand why anyone would rely on such a system for reliable, objective information or responses. I have noted several incorrect AI responses to queries, and people mindlessly citing said response without verifying the data or its source. People gonna get stupider, faster.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Not a lot of meat on this article, but yeah, I think it's pretty obvious that those who seek automated tools to define their own thoughts and feelings become dependent. If one is so incapable of mapping out ones thoughts and putting them to written word, its natural they'd seek ease and comfort with the "good enough" (fucking shitty as hell) output of a bot.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dumples@midwest.social 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This makes a lot of sense because as we have been seeing over the last decades or so is that digital only socialization isn't a replacement for in person socialization. Increased social media usage shows increased loneliness not a decrease. It makes sense that something even more fake like ChatGPT would make it worse.

I don't want to sound like a luddite but overly relying on digital communications for all interactions is a poor substitute for in person interactions. I know I have to prioritize seeing people in the real world because I work from home and spending time on Lemmy during the day doesn't fulfill.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›