this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1060 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

66465 readers
5482 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shaquilleoatmeal@lemm.ee 43 points 12 hours ago

“The plagiarism machine will break without more things to plagiarize.”

[–] FeelThePower@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago

fucking thank goodness

[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 13 points 11 hours ago

Okay.

It was fun while it lasted.

For someone.

I presume.

[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 23 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Good, end this AI bullshit, it has little upsides and a metric fuckton of downsides for the common man

[–] techclothes@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

It has some great upsides. But those upsides can be trained on specific information that they pay for instead of training AI on people's stuff who didn't consent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

Oh no anyway.jpg

[–] SaladKing@lemm.ee 10 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

This is exactly what social media companies have been doing for a while (it’s free, yes) they use your data to train their algorithms to squeeze more money out of people. They get a tangible and monetary benefit from our collective data. These AI companies want to train their AI on our hard work and then get monetary benefit off of it. How is this not seen as theft or even if they are not doing it just yet…how is it not seen as an attempt at theft?

How come people (not the tech savvy) are unable to see how they are being exploited? These companies are not currently working towards any UBI bills or policies in governments that I am aware of. Since they want to take our work, and use it to get rich and their investors rich why do they think they are justified in using people’s work? It just seems so slime-y.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Capital calls its own theft "innovation" and that of the individual "crime".

[–] Greyfoxsolid@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago

They're actually not making money. They're losing money. Yes yes, I know they're raising billions of dollars, but that goes into the training of the these models which requires manpower and a massive amount of compute and energy. Yeah, they tend to charge to use it (but also offer free tiers) but this is to put back into training.

Here's the thing. The cat is out of the bag. It's coming one way or another, and it will either be by us, or it will be by not us.

I'd rather it be us. Id rather us not be so selfish and rather us be willing to contribute to this ultimate tool for the betterment of all.

[–] Hawanja@lemmy.world 35 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

What a giant load of crap.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 49 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

The only way this would be ok is if openai was actually open. make the entire damn thing free and open source, and most of the complaints will go away.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] psyspoop@lemm.ee 147 points 22 hours ago (20 children)

But I can't pirate copyrighted materials to "train" my own real intelligence.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] magnus919@lemmy.brandyapple.com 4 points 11 hours ago

I'll take him seriously if & when OpenAI lives up to its name.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 8 points 14 hours ago

No, actually they've just finally admitted that they can't improve them any further because there's not enough training data in existence to squeeze any more demonizing returns out of.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Oops, oh well. I very much hope it's over, asshole.

[–] Greyfoxsolid@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago

It will never be over. We will either be the ones dominant in this area, or it won't be us. If it's not us, well, the consequences could be dire.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 38 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Why does Sam have such a punchable face?

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 29 points 19 hours ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 30 points 19 hours ago

over it is then. Buh bye!

[–] rageagainstmachines@lemmy.world 103 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

"We can't succeed without breaking the law. We can't succeed without operating unethically."

I'm so sick of this bullshit. They pretend to love a free market until it's not in their favor and then they ask us to bend over backwards for them.

Too many people think they're superior. Which is ironic, because they're also the ones asking for handouts and rule bending. If you were superior, you wouldn't need all the unethical things that you're asking for.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 29 points 19 hours ago

Business that stole everyone's information to train a model complains that businesses can steal information to train models.

Yeah I'll pour one out for folks who promised to open-source their model and then backed out the moment the money appeared... Wankers.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 43 points 22 hours ago (25 children)

Copyrights should have never been extended longer than 5 years in the first place, either remove draconian copyright laws or outlaw LLM style models using copyrighted material, corpos can't have both.

[–] Greyfoxsolid@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So these companies are against what you call draconian, but you also disagree with these companies? Everyone here is so fucking short sighted, it's insane to me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›