this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
888 points (99.7% liked)

Political Memes

6987 readers
3253 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

I mean....ok.

that means we can storm the capital and it's ok, right?

1000001257

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 19 points 8 hours ago

Oh noo, it caused mass terror throughout the country ... when people saw mildly vandalised pre-shitty cars, PTSD for life.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So what you're saying is: the only wqy to not be a terrorist is to threaten elected officials until I get my way?

I'm off to be an upstanding citizen.

[–] painfulasterisk1@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 hours ago

Can't be any elected official, the waiver only applies toward a specific group.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Terrorism only applies to brown or poor people.

If you’re rich you get a free pass to do anything including genocide.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 54 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The only moral ~~abortion~~ domestic terrorism is my ~~abortion~~ domestic terrorism.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago
[–] starshipHighwayman69@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 hours ago

This isn't even vandalism. Zero windshields were harmed by the paint.

[–] Imhotep@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago

ohh I see it now...

[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 28 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

Fun fact: a replacement windshield for a tesla is on average 1,200 - 2,000 dollars because of their dumb as fuck design

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Cyberwindshield: $1200

Cyberwindshield wiper: 3 months backorder

Making a Nazi supporter cry: priceless

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I heard the horse cock of a windshield wiper is almost irreplaceable because it's 4 feet long and in limited supply.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

It's also made significantly more expensive by the fact that it IS an actual cock from a horse.

Purebred only, on Musk's insistence.

[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago

Hand picked by the man himself I hear

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 hours ago

Inspired by the Bible.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You're not technically wrong since they were just early to the party with driver assistance & Lane departure warning/avoidance systems, but since the USA made those types of systems mandatory for all cars in 2023, most vehicles 2023+ will now have a similar cost.

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I don't get it, what does that have to do with the windshield design?

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

The cameras that track the lines on the road and other cars are mounted to the windshield. these windshields are more expensive because the camera brackets have to be precisely aligned and the glass (in that area) must be completely free of optical distortions. Both of those things raise the price of the windshield, and increase design complexity

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

To mount the cameras on the windshield is a design decision, though

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, a design decision initiated by Tesla and a trend the entire industry followed outside of a few autonomous taxis that have the lidar units on the roof.

However, the alternative requires a separate lens cleaning system as the former just reuses the windshield wiper. So it does reduce the complexity somewhat.

Or maybe I'm missing your point entirely?

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Would a small wiper to handle the lens cleaning not be more cost effective than increasing the complexity of the windshield to the point of significant cost increase?

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not on the production/manufacturing side so I could only speculate on the costs. The entire industry's use of the windshield mounted cameras would suggest the costs are lower. Even at the ultra high end like Bently, where there's plenty of profit margin to experiment with, they're still using the windshield mounted cameras.

The other factor to consider would be that the driver can very easily know when the windshield wipers aren't working (an therefore ignore or deactivate suggested lane departure corrections), but a tiny wiper mounted above the roof would be impossible to see while driving.

[–] mycelium_underground@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That second factor is not really a factor. The windshield wipers on my 20 year old truck have never stopped working, just replace the wipers every once in a while.

If you can't see that you are not departing your lane on your own, the you are not capable of driving, and you drivers licence should be revoked.

Teslas are not autonomous, if you can't drive, you shouldn't be driving. I'm all for self driving, most people drive like shit with 30 distractions going at the same time, but until they are actually autonomous, the person driving still has to drive. If they can not tell that they are departing or not departing a lane by themselves, they should not be allowed to drive period.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

The second factor is a factor just not a common one, which is why I listed it second. I've never personally seen a wiper motor die, but I have seen the transmissions break, and wiper blades that get torn and wiper arms get bent in (extremely) icy conditions. Your point about most drivers being distracted & driving like shit kinda makes it a bigger concern, since there's no way distracted drivers would notice the additional wiper of a "'self-driving"' camera has gone bad or gotten bent.

I don't disagree with you on the other points though. There are NO level 5 fully autonomous self-driving cars currently, only pretenders that give people who can't pay attention a false sense of security.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

for context the windshield of a big ass semi truck costs between $65-225 or just 18% at worst or 3% at best
and they're pretty large too

cost src

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

For the cybertruck? The design of the others are mostly reasonable, I would assume every replacement part for the cybertruck is much more expensive since it's so fucking ridiculous. I've never had to replace a windshield fortunately so I don't know how much they normally cost.

[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

'mostly reasonable' they integrate into the roof glass and their shape makes them 10x the price of a new windshield

I can get a replacement for a 2010 Ford for about 200$

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

You might have misread, nothing about the cybertruck is reasonable, the other models are mostly reasonable. $200? Good to know.

[–] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 30 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Gotta be one of the biggest/fastest drops in a company’s stock value since Cutthroat Island opened in theaters.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Which is really upsetting, because that was a good movie and the SNES game was great.

[–] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

Movie was fun, it just didn’t do well as far as sales go and it was expensive - so it’s considered a “box office bomb”.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

SNESDrunk has entered the chat

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 10 hours ago

I was recently reminded of it because of the vid, but the game always was, and is, fun.

[–] Signtist@lemm.ee 12 points 10 hours ago

Remember, Trump doesn't say things that are true - or even things he thinks are true - he only says things that he thinks will benefit him to say. So yes, it benefits him to say Jan 6 wasn't domestic terrorism, and that vandalism of his boss' cars is domestic terrorism.

[–] Caffeinated_Sloth@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago

Plutocracy: Destroy Capitol? Ok. Destroy Capital? Not on my watch!

[–] taxiiiii@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

They're clearly destabilizing the countries integrity by checks notes vandalizing cars! Property damage is obviously much worse than actual violence, so long as the property is expensive enough. /s

[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 15 points 12 hours ago

It’s always the opposite with these weirdos.

[–] rockettaco37@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Now try living here. No wonder half of us are so cynical