this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
169 points (99.4% liked)

politics

21679 readers
4071 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 5 points 44 minutes ago

I hope Zelenskyy is getting good traction with the Europeans. Trump's involvement is only making things worse. He has no skin in the game and is only involved in order to service Putin.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 75 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Spoiler alert: Trump will blame Zelenskyy

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Double realpolitik spoiler: Zelenskyy expects that and is instead setting up a narrative to demand more action from sane countries (Canada, Europe) when the US inevitably renegs.

But as a fun little gift Rubio set the US up to look like assholes with a statement last night:

Rubio noted that if the Kremlin rejects the ceasefire proposal, "then we'll, unfortunately, know what the impediment is to peace here."

"Ukraine is ready to stop shooting and start talking," Rubio said, adding that U.S. President Donald Trump has been clear that he wants to stop the war swiftly.

This will be egg on the administration's face when they try and walk it back when Russia says "fuck off".

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

This will be egg on the administration's face when they try and walk it back when Russia says "fuck off".

That entire meeting was zel driving a wedge between Putin and Trump. If that wasn't obvious when zel said he thought Putin was afraid of Trump then I'm not sure what else would make it obvious.

Now it's to the point where it's basically like whoever blinks first is the pussy, think of it like a really dumb petty Cuban missile crisis.

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 1 points 40 minutes ago (1 children)

The Cuban middle crisis was resolved through negotiation and concessions, not by a game of nuclear chicken.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 35 minutes ago

That's exactly how this was resolved. Ukraine forced trump to show his weakness so now he either has to step up involvement in Ukraine or very visibly cowtow to Putin on the world stage.

I dunno if you keep up with history but that's quite literally how the Cuban missile crisis ended, in negotiations behind closed doors and I might add with resolutions that weren't public for iirc about a decade and even then the government didn't want people to know.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 53 minutes ago (1 children)

think of it like a really dumb petty Cuban missile crisis

Dumb, "petty," and over a million casualties so far. I don't recall anyone dying during the Cuban missile crisis.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 41 minutes ago

Not the war, this dumb fucking standoff that Trump just lost.

[–] b1t@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

“then we’ll, unfortunately, know what the impediment is to peace here.”

Like we didn't already know that (see: Russia's initial invasion). But facts and reason don't matter to these clowns.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 9 points 23 hours ago

Again, of course we all know that, we all know that Russia is the aggressor here and Trump is clearly trying to put them in a favorable position for some reason that may be related to blackmail, future aspirations or just wanting to gargle Putin's balls. These are facts that can't change - but by accepting the cease fire and making these statements Zelenskyy is trying to maximize the blow back if and when America renegs to, ideally, maximize the support Ukraine can receive.

In the world of diplomacy appearance matters more than facts - three months ago America was the dominant economic force and had a military that could curb stomp anyone in formal battle - today America is still the dominant economic force and has a military that can curbstomp anyone in formal battle but they're an unreliable partner and so America has lost nearly all of their outsized soft/diplomatic power - the facts are still essentially the same, but the perception massively shifted.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

He set us up to look like assholes if we set Zelensky's whole visit up to dunk on him and blame him for Russia's invasion, so Rubio's sprinkle of respectful/rational comments doesn't really change things

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 0 points 49 minutes ago

Respectful/rational? Rubio acting like he's just realized that Putin might not be on the level? He's either playing dumb or actually is dumb.

[–] suite403@lemmy.world 30 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I wouldn't trust the US at all if I were him. Russia will not honor yhr cease fire but take advantage and Trump will blame Zelensky.

[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 3 points 14 hours ago

Agreed I get the suspicion that if a cease-fire actually happens Russia will pull a sneak attack during the cease-fire and blame it on Ukraine, which trump will inevitably back and send more weapons to Russia. And that could escalate in other European countries being brought into conflict.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Yes this is advantageous to both the USA and the world. Zelensky played a better game and trump and most of his followers are just too stupid/bought in to see it.

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

No he doesn't.

Does he?

No - he can't possibly. He's not that stupid. He knows just as well as anyone and better than most that Trump can never be trusted, and especially when it comes to his idol Putin.

So he has to know that Russia could methodically reject or violate every single aspect of this deal, and Trump will just smile and nod and say, "Whatever you want Vladdy!"

So this has to be just a bit of careful rhetoric - an attempt by Zelenskyy to make the responsibility the US necessarily has for this deal manifest, so that he'll have something to point to later on, when Trump inevitably betrays him.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's trying to make Trump look weak if he fails to meet our end of the bargain. He knows it will happen, Trump is weak, and Trump will say something like, "Strength is looking your enemy in the eye while you suck his dick."

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Trump may be weak but our military won't let us look like pussies and hegseth is too much of a bitch to actually be sec def and stand up to anyone anyway.

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's meant to apply pressure. Failing to provide a strong response would mean that Trump is weak. He is both stroking Trumps ego and subtly poking it at the same time.

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 23 hours ago

Mm... good point.

My rhetorical question aside, yes - it's plain that what Zelenskyy's actually doing is putting Trump on the spot.

But I hadn't put together that the specific phrasing of it also strokes Trump's ego - that's a nice touch

You’re not the audience Zelenskyy is speaking to. He’s speaking primarily to an audience of one. The audience is Trump.

The spectators (i.e. the rest of Europe) are also watching this and observing that Zelenskyy is still doing his best to follow proper geopolitical and diplomatic form, and will probably continue to strengthen their support for Ukraine when orangeboi inevitably fucks them over again.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I really hope he doesn't actually believe that and this is just a public statement for pressure, because this is Drump we're talking about, his fingers are probably permanently crossed LMAO

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If there's anyone who can run circles around Little t, it's ... well, it's anyone, but it's also Zelenskyy.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 1 points 1 day ago

And yet, here we are.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Zelensky should use any pause in the conflict to re-arm like mad. Divest from Starlink everywhere possible, and bring in European weapon systems. Don't even think about slowing down until they're mining Chernobyl for nukes with a stockpile already standing.

[–] badwetter@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

@Skyrmir@lemmy.world

The Russians are aware, and this won't alter the fact that Ukraine has lost the war and won't be able to re-arm in a pause. Russia has already stated many times previously that they aren't willing to accept a ceasefire — why should they when they're the winning side?

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Zelensky has by no means lost the war, short of the US actually attacking them, which is very unlikely. Especially since half the stalling speeches while the GoP lost the CR vote today were GoP senators talking about backing Ukraine against Russia.

The EU is giving Zelensky better weapons than Russia can field, but production is slow or still ramping up. Russia has a ton of production, for shit weapons. Every passing moment moves advantage more towards Ukraine as more weapon system and insulation against Trump/Starlink comes online. No matter how the cease fire ends up, Russia is on a path to defeat by the end of the year. By next year Putin will be leveraging his house to pay Xi back his loans. And no matter who wins, China wins.

[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Europe can’t even produce their own ballistic missiles which have been a game changer in Ukraine as shown by the effectiveness of ATACMS and Iskander-M. And Russia has been massively out producing Europe in terms of air-launched cruise missiles so don’t bring up Storm Shadow (Kh-101 is longer range than Storm Shadow anyways) or other similar weapon systems.

Russia produced more T-90Ms (a very good tank mind you) last year than the amount of tanks the entire German military has. Production was 20-30 per month last year but this has likely since doubled. Losses for T-90Ms have been low as per Oryx with production massively outpacing losses (one to two months of production last year was enough to replace yearly T-90M losses).

Even T-72B3 has a superior fire control system than the forty year old system used on the Leopard 2A6.

The UK practically sent their entire stockpile of SPGs to Ukraine thus have gutted their military to nil and Poland thrown half of their stockpile of SPGs to Ukraine for example. Russia is producing more artillery shells than the entirety of Europe combined according to pro-Ukraine sources. People forget that tanks are not the only weapon that armies have. Almost every European country has complained about massive shortages of ammunition due to it all being given to Ukraine. France stated they could only fight Russia for a few weeks before running out of ammo. Other European countries have stated similar things.

Most of Russian Armed Forces aren't even in Ukraine (thus have a lot of capability to make Ukraine’s situation even worse), majority of forces in Ukraine are from irregular volunteer formations recruited from regions across Russia.

Hence why casualties amongst Russian professionals are low:

Motorized Rifles: 6,457

VDV: 3,257

Naval Infantry: 1,305

Tank Crew: 1,806

Artillery: 851

Special Forces: 736

Engineering: 291

Navy: 291

VVS: 265

Other: 957

Total: 16,216

Source: MediaZona

For comparison:

US losses from 2003-2005 mainly against insurgents: 5175

Source: Defense Casualty Analysis System

In comparison, Russia had just annihilated tens of thousands of Ukraine's troops from the most elite units at Kursk oblast (up to over 100K albeit take that number with a grain of salt as it is almost certainly exaggerated greatly).

[–] giacomo@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

oh, the foreshadowing

[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

He will get a free Tesla…paid for by him. And he will fucking love it or else.

[–] kane@femboys.biz 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

For Russia, this ceasefire is most likely more helpful to re assess than it is for Ukraine.

It would be odd if Russia would decline it, and it might just be to provoke a reaction from the US, in whatever way that might be.

[–] deadkennedy@lemm.ee 1 points 23 hours ago

bro.

have you seen the clown in charge?!

[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

US still thinks it's your fault, Zelenskyy. Now that the idiotic administration will see you meeting with the Saudi Prince, who's to say that they'll think you're siding with terrorists now because they can't differentiate reality from fiction? They don't have your back right now. Russia will reject the ceasefire, US will still think it's Ukraine's fault, continue sucking Putin's dick and stop supporting altogether.

[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

US still thinks it’s your fault, Zelenskyy.

Well it is.