this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
461 points (98.7% liked)

politics

21679 readers
4124 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 181 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

Those already have a name - company town.

They failed the last time they were tried and will fail again.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 107 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

But before they failed, they stole a ton of labor/profit from the residents.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They didn't just fail on their own. They were very successful until the labor movement decided to meet violence with violence.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MercuryGenisus@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

Can't wait to pick out which burbclave to join..

[–] socphoenix@midwest.social 40 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

According to interviews and presentations viewed by WIRED, the goal of these cities would be to have places where anti-aging clinical trials, nuclear reactor startups, and building construction can proceed without having to get prior approval from agencies like the Food and Drug Administration, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Environmental Protection Agency.

Yes because the first thing I think needs regulations is fucking nuclear power!

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 20 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

If anyone reads that and goes “hell yea”…

Also what the fuck is a “nuclear reactor startup”?!? God, tech bros really take a whole bunch of privilege and advantage and just throw it all away to be dumber than anyone could have thought possible.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 26 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's like a regular nuclear reactor, except it's run by people who don't know anything about nuclear reactors, the waste is dumped wherever without consequence, and the power output is only used to run an AI and mine cryptos.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chetradley@lemm.ee 11 points 14 hours ago

The "move fast and break things" mantra of silicon valley is bad enough when you aren't talking about breaking a goddamn nuclear reactor.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 hours ago

Can we just build an artificial island in the middle of the ocean for these losers? Just drop them there and let them try to figure it out. See how long before they come begging for help.

[–] theluckyone@discuss.online 6 points 13 hours ago

Sounds too much like Vault-Tec for my tastes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DonJefe@lemmy.world 158 points 19 hours ago (10 children)

A city run by a corporation is the opposite of a "freedom city"

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 79 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

It's freedom from government regulations, many of which stem from the last time we let companies set up their own towns. What could possibly go wrong?

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 17 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Last time we got full scale shooting wars between workers and companies. If I'm putting on my optimist hat then I'd say at least we'll get to shoot some rich folk.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] techclothes@lemmy.world 41 points 18 hours ago

Yes, but it does follow republican naming convention. Right to work states are anything but, for example.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] kane@femboys.biz 91 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

“ You load 16 tons, what do you get? Another day older and deeper in debt St. Peter, don't you call me 'cause I can't go I owe my soul to the company store “

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 10 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

War Is Peace. Freedom Is Slavery. Ignorance Is Strength.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 16 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Did these guys play cyberpunk? Like that game pretty much embodies what these guys are asking for.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I think Musk has talked about the game, and obviously every message was completely lost on him and his main takeaway was that "Arasaka is cool. I want to be that."

That is exactly what they want.

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 hours ago

“Blade Runner would drive a cybertruck!”

[–] SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago

They would love that. That game is all about execs essentially being royalty. That's like their wet dream.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 37 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Do you want Night City? Because this is quite literally how you get Night City.

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I'm starting to think that's what they want.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Always has been. Cyberpunk (the genre) was a warning. We didn't listen.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 10 hours ago

A genre built in the 80's and 90's, a commentary on the inevitable path of neoliberalism?

No way!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 63 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

This is the dumbest branding exercise ever. There are no additional "freedoms" that you can get in a corporate-run city versus a regular city; except that perhaps the corporation has more freedom to trounce upon the rights of the citizenry.

If the future that Curtis Yarvin and his type envision starts to shape up, we're gonna need to go full, 100% anti-corporation to push back.

except that perhaps the corporation has more freedom to trounce upon the rights of the citizenry.

That is exactly the kind of freedom they are looking for, and don't underestimate the psychology there - it feels like freedom to them, the kind of freedom that allows for injustices to prevail. I'm reminded of an anecdote of Ẑiẑek, talking to a bunch of fascists in former Yugoslavia, where they in no uncertain terms revealed, that it had been tyranny to them to not be able to be violent, rape, plunder, etc. and that the chaos of the breakup had been a liberatory event for them, psychologically.

Never assume "freedom" is something, that opposing classes and groups in general agree upon when it comes to its definition.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world 37 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Tech bros love to rename terrible shit from the past and call it an invention.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I actually like this idea. So long as the CEOs are required to live in the town as well a minimum of 300 days out of the year.

Because working in an office is worth the collaboration.

And I like knowing where the CEOs are so that checks instance name I can play Minecraft with them in person. I get so much more enjoyment playing Minecraft in person and would like to make sure the latency is really low.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 hours ago

It would never happen that way.

By the way, we used to do this. You can read all about it. It's very very bad.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

There we go. Now we're looking at the Star Trek dystopia that we expected last year.

Just a bit delayed

[–] Cgers@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 14 hours ago

This "plan" is literally the setting of Snow Crash

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 27 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't think I would live to see Cyberpunk become a reality. Or the return of Company Towns. Either one sounds preposterous.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] carsncode@lemmy.world 19 points 18 hours ago

Freedom Cities is a branding exercise in the same tradition as the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. The more you have to advertise how free a society is, the less free it tends to be in practice.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›