this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
11 points (100.0% liked)

Football

331 readers
74 users here now

Here for discussion of all things association football/soccer!

Rules

Other Football/Soccer Related Communities

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jjpamsterdam@feddit.org 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I honestly did no see this coming. PSG ertainly is a stronger team than it was a few years ago and is playing some real football. However, after winning the first leg, I was convinced that the Reds would also manage to get this tie sorted. Well, I guess it's likely "only" the Premier League title for Liverpool then.

[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I felt that they were pretty bad in the first leg, the difference between the number of shots for the first leg was insane, a lesser keeper and they would have been 3 or 4 down. Second leg they played much better, to be expected with the switch to playing at home.

Overall PSG were the better side.

[–] jjpamsterdam@feddit.org 3 points 5 hours ago

Exactly. That's what convinced me that Liverpool would edge past PSG. Normally no team that steals a result on an off day and then improves in the second leg goes out. This match showed that this feeling was premature.

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine topping the table only to be rewarded with facing a top 3 team in Europe in R16.

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair, PSG were not playing like a top 3 team at the start of the season. It is only later on that the team clicked.

Also to win a title, you should have to beat the best. No use crying about it.

The improvement has been amazing. 6 months ago a bunch of people on r/PSG were calling for Enrique to be fired.