Games

16758 readers

1056 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

New Minimum Age Classifications for Gambling, Loot Box Content in Australia - IGN (www.ign.com)

submitted 1 year ago by geosoco@kbin.social to c/games@sh.itjust.works

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

From September 2024, any games featuring simulated gambling (such as social casino games) will be rated R18+. R18+ is a legally restricted category in Australia, and games rated R18+ cannot be sold to people under 18.

Additionally, the minimum rating for “games containing in-game purchases linked to elements of chance, including paid loot boxes” will be M. Games rated M in Australia are recommended for people over 15, but this is advisory only; M is not a legally restricted category.

The changes will only apply to games that are released from September next year, and will not apply retrospectively.

From September 2024, any games featuring simulated gambling (such as social casino games) will be rated R18+
According to pre-pandemic figures, Australia has the greatest per capita gambling losses in the world, and is a staggering 40 per cent clear of second place.

The introduction of mandatory minimum classifications for gambling-related content was one of the recommendations from a review Australia’s classification regulations that was undertaken in 2020 and published earlier this year.

...

top 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

Simulated gambling is 18+ but real gambling is M? They got this backwards imo.

[–] GrammatonCleric@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love how they use a pic of an Overwatch loot box, literally the only loot box I actually miss 😅

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We remember it with fondness, and yet, it was the lootbox that started it all.

Good riddance.

[–] ReeferPirate@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I was absolutely opening CS:GO boxes when Overwatch was on its way to release

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

True enough. But Overwatch was the first big game where they basically got completely ignored as an exploitative mechanic on PC.

Micro-transactions were for a long time mobile only, then it was free-to-play only.

Remember, OW was a full-price title. Yet, it still worked like a free-to-play.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Fuck them kids. This business model is abusive no matter who it's targeting.

[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So a game with a harmless in-game poker minigame with worthless chips are strictly adult only, but not games with real money loot boxes specifically designed to addict you and take your money?

[–] dandroid@dandroid.app 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is poker considering gambling in Australia? In California, it's considered a game of skill, not chance, so it is not gambling.

[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Still, a simulated slot machine with worthless chips is adult only over manipulative loot boxes? This regulation is too lopsided.

[–] dandroid@dandroid.app 2 points 1 year ago

I totally get your point, and it's 100% valid. I just got curious is all.

[–] CouldntCareBear@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure why they they threw that in... that's not really a problem as far as I'm aware. Maybe they consider it a gateway to gambling?