They already figured it out: howdovaccinescauseautism.com
this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
80 points (96.5% liked)
New York Times gift articles
779 readers
244 users here now
Share your New York Times gift articles links here.
Rules:
- Only post New York Times gift article links.
Info:
- The NYT Open Team. (2021-06-23). “A New Way to Share New York Times Stories”. open.nytimes.com.
- “Gift Articles for New York Times Subscribers”. (n.d.). help.nytimes.com.
Tip:
- Google "unlocked_article_code" and limit search results to the past week.
- Mastodon: Use control-F or ⌘-F to search this page. (ref)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
If you want a real summary. In order for anything to cause autism it would need to permanently change the way your brain works and the two systems(vaccines and mutations) are separate. Vaccines introduce the equivalence of an antigen for you to make antibodies which is not genetic manipulation just hijacking/abusing signalling pathways.
A distant family member wasn't vaccinated (can't remember why his parents chose not to). But when he was around 20, he got tested and was diagnosed with autism. I remember him posting about it in his socials and was like, "well, I'm gonna go get vaccinated now!"
Efficient.
DOGE will eliminate this ridiculous waste of money, right? Right?
Is that Bob Saget?
Yes. The movie is Half Baked.
I'm sure they tried their best.
If he ain't back in 10 mins we calling dominoes
They won't allow the results to show anything other than a link between the two.
It's my opinion that all US departments are now compromised. Any "research" done here will only have results that align with the white house. Much like any research headed by Marjorie Traitor Greene or JFK jr. would be so inherently flawed as to only show biased results.
There’s no efficiency in this!
If they end up citing the famous Lancet paper, then you know they didn’t even try to make up new bullshit.
For anyone unaware, Lancet published a paper in 1998 that claimed there were links between the MMR vaccine and environmental triggers that lead to loss of acquired skills including language. The study being conducted turned out to be fraudulent, with parents of many of the children involved in lawsuits against the vaccine manufacturers, as well as unethical treatment of children. 12 years later in 2010, Lancet retracted the paper. This paper is a very well known source anti-vaccination proponents have frequently cited. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2831678/
EDIT: If you want to watch a video explaining the study, this here is a good one. https://youtu.be/i00SYBe63EQ
Ah, I figured it out
In pursuing the study, the C.D.C. is defying the wishes of the chairman of the Senate Health Committee, Senator Bill Cassidy, who said this week that further research into any supposed link between vaccines and autism would be a waste of money and a distraction from research that might shed light on the “true reason” for a rise in autism rates.
Some chemical company already knows why.
Isn't autism an inherited thing?