this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
-4 points (47.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43863 readers
1626 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'll start:

  • Some significant portion of funds go towards development of the Lemmy software. 80%? Rest goes to lemmy instance hosting.
  • Ads are reasonable and non-intrusive (no popups etc)
  • People can still browse w/ an adblocker

I personally would gladly turn off my adblocker if I knew the ads were supporting development. Hell, I might even click a few!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nix@merv.news 110 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] IzzyData@lemmy.ml 52 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Yea. The question is completely absurd. There is no such thing as "reasonable ads". It is also completely against the philosophy of the project and the developers would never agree to it.

You may as well just browse Reddit at that point.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 year ago

Also, ads are very much "give an inch, take a mile" in nature. Once you open that door and have say a tiny banner ad, then it's like "well that didn't do much harm, let's do a slightly bigger one", then before you know it it you have sponsored posts, sidebar ads, videos and all that nonsense.

It's just one of the avenues where enshittification creeps in IMO.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] elouboub@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

The second I see ads on an instance, I'm off it. Fuck that noise.

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 85 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm happy when an instance owner just says how much it costs to run a server, how many people actually manage it and how much time they spend to keep it running. I also like it when they just come out and say "we need this much money to keep things running every month, every year, etc"

Then I just donate and there are more a dozen ways people can send and recieve donations.

I don't mind paying for things and services if the person or people I'm donating to are just honest about what they need and why, especially if it's a service I use often.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same, but sometimes it's not possible due to the different payment methods that don't work the same accross different countries.

It's unlikely ads would bring in any significant amount of money from them se people, in that case.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] raptir@lemdro.id 48 points 1 year ago

There are no circumstances under which I would be okay with it. Including ads means there is a chance that content is removed to appease advertisers.

I will happily donate to my instance once they start accepting donations.

[–] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 year ago

Under no conditions. Don't try to normalize ads.

[–] elouboub@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Bro, who are these people trying to normalise ads? Do y'all work for ad-companies or have you been brainwashed enough to believe ads are the only way? Ads are a braindead problem for another problem looking for a solution.

Fuck ads. Write that 50 times. If isn't through your skull after 50, write another 50 and repeat until it is. Fuck ads.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago

I would much rather see the "Daily costs donation bar" that Reddit used to have

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 14 points 1 year ago
[–] nuez_jr@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Straightforward funding requests from the instance are just fine. Advertisements can gargle a cactus.

[–] 404@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 year ago

I'd be okay with devs promoting their own FOSS software, etc. And seeing donation buttons every now and then. No trad ads plz. We have enough of those.

Never, i would leave my instance immediately. Thankfully i dont believe this will ever happen. If admins need funds community members will donate. Through mutual cooperation we can keep these spaces free of the commercial bullshit that has infested every other faet of our lives.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

In my view, the problem isn't monetizing an instance, but that ads right now are fundamentally problematic. I don't know of a way to introduce ads that wouldn't be intrusive, invade user privacy, introduce bad motives for admins, and just be generally unpleasant. If money is a problem, I think a subscriber model would be better suited for the platform rather than taking any step to normalize ads.

[–] Binthinkin@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Everyone sucks at business. Everyone. Businesses is an art form. You can do anything you want with it.

Check this out. Free isn’t a real thing. You cannot build a site in your free time and then give it away for free and expect people to pick up the slack.

You need to charge people. So you need a secure way to handle information and payments.

NOBODY wants ads anywhere anymore. It’s mind poison from another time.

Creator owned platforms is where its at.

Nebula.tv is a great example.

If you cannot figure out a pay schedule then hire or collaborate with someone who does.

[–] chraebsli@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

NO ADS! These platforms were created so that you won't see any ads ever. If you want to support the instances or platforms, you can make a donation via Patreon/ BuyMeACoffee or what they use. Here is a list of links for some platforms:

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nah. I don't plan to ever have ads. Hardly any users so my nice little single server will be fine for years to come and I can afford it no problem. If somehow I got a lot of users, I'd likely just close registration rather than ads. I hate ads!

[–] tubbadu@lemmy.kde.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Virtually nobody opts in, and power users opt out. If someone is running ads, they presumably want to make money, and they'll only be making money if it's on by default

[–] 404@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago

Yes. That is the point.

[–] tubbadu@lemmy.kde.social 6 points 1 year ago

exactly. This is the only type of ads I'd tolerate

[–] milkjug@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

Fuck ads, don't normalize this. I left Reddit because of enshittification, and putting ads on lemmy is just another first step towards that inevitable end. I'll just spin my own instance back up. I had one running but I took it down to avoid the influx of CSAM on some instances.

[–] esc27@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
  • Transparency - where the ads come from, how the revenue is used, etc.
  • the ads are safe and appropriate and follow the same rules as posts and comments
  • the ads are clearly labeled or otherwise visually distinct and not disguised as user generated content
  • the ads do not make up more than 10% of the displayed content (by any metric (screen space, text, bytes, etc.)
  • the ads are in like/kind to the surrounding content (e.g. if the community is text only, so are the ads, if the community allows images but not video, then the ads cannot move, etc.)
  • no tracking
  • the ads can be removed via subscription or donation
  • no double dipping (e.g. charging for access and still showing ads.) Members who support the instance should not see ads, members who see ads should not be required to pay.
  • a transparent removal process for problematic ads
[–] criitz@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago
  • Visually distinct, not possible to mix it up with content
  • No more than 10% of visual space
  • Fixed - meaning directly agreed by with instance admin, no algorithmic ads or ad exchanges
  • No tracking, no cookies. simply an image and a link embedded in the site
[–] millie@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago
[–] ShadowCatEXE@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Opt-in ads. Disabled by default, but gives the user the choice to support the instance if they do not want to (or can't) provide a monetary donation.

I don't want ads any other way.

[–] redballooon@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I’d rather do monthly payments than having ads. Oh wait, I’m already contributing monthly.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

The last 2 of your points.

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Zero. There are other ways to monetize I’ll gladly accept first.

[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Any lemmy instance using ads instead of donations should be abandoned to wither and die. It should get globally defederated... because any users ok with ads are not users we want on the fediverse.

[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
[–] Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

None. Dont need ads on my own instance

[–] rastilin@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I already donate to my Mastodon instance, if my instance needs or wants money for any reason, they should set up a donation button and I'll subscribe. Which will give them a lot more money than they would ever make from showing me ads. We should normalize removing all ads from the internet, forever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gabe 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think for a shitpost instance a custom ad network banner ads with memes and shitposts would be make sense. What I mean by that is that on geocities as well as some small internet sites there’s β€œcustom ad networks” where they basically rely on donations and or just random people submitting β€œads” that normally tend to be just links to their site, weird obscure memes, animal pictures, etc.

I think real ads for the sake of advertising on lemmy wouldn’t really be acceptable in any form, but shitposting ads have potential imo

[–] radix@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

That sounds great. I remember seeing really old sites with these.

[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

hell no, never. start a patreon

I don't mind ads as long as they're not following me around. Show me ads based on the community that I'm browsing or something if you want better targeting

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Without tracking/privacy invasion, related to the board/community, non animated, not excessive

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί