this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
407 points (98.8% liked)

politics

20370 readers
3375 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
aidan@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
407
Thousands in Midwestern GOP Districts Attend Sanders' First Stops on Tour to Fight Oligarchy | "It's like there's only one person who is actually able to sidestep the demoralization and frustration" (www.commondreams.org)
submitted 12 hours ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
54 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

What's crazy and I feel very shortsighted of the Democrats is that they aren't doing this more often. There is a large population that will/would respond to this type of politicking from the "opposition". They would generate tons of energy for more protests and put more pressure on the republicans to oppose shit.

instead we get:

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) has garnered scorn for meeting with Silicon Valley executives to "mend fences" with the powerful tech sector—where numerous CEOs have signaled support for Trump during his second term.

Ken Martin, the newly elected chair of the Democratic National Committee, said last month that the party should continue to take money from "good billionaires."

[–] deadtom@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Democrats are the controlled opposition. It's why they would never give Sanders a fair shake. He would upset them "good billionaires" because going further right is preferable than a single step left for the wealthy.

[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 3 points 39 minutes ago (1 children)

Under the proposed Trump tax cuts, I bet a vast majority of our Democrat leaders are looking at a big tax cut. From their standpoint, they need to put up just enough push back to get re-elected next election. Don't rock the boat and get on Trump's bad side.

We need to clump the corporate democrats with the Republicans. None of them work for us. We need more AOC, Bernie, Jasmine Crockett, Rep Maxwell Frosts.

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 minutes ago

From their standpoint, they need to put up just enough push back to get re-elected next election.

You just unlocked the D playbook going back to at LEAST 2000 and dubya.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 69 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

The fact that it still has to be Bernie doing this is nothing short of a failure on the part of the American people.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 2 points 24 minutes ago (1 children)

Pritzker is the only one even close to Sanders level, and he has the money to create a private army to hunt the gop traitors down like animals. I hope he does. File state level treason charges against Trump and his appointees, fly in some Ukrainian spec ops troops, a bunch of SAM's and drones, and I'll be one of the first volunteers help end the Russia problem

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 minutes ago

File state level treason charges against Trump and his appointees, fly in some Ukrainian spec ops troops, a bunch of SAM’s and drones, and I’ll be one of the first volunteers help end the Russia problem

Giggitygiggitygiggity GOO!

Well, I'm spent.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

He's one of precious few in office who have any credibility on the issue.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I mean yes, and that's what I'm calling a failure on the part of the American people.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago

Or a success on the part of the two party hegemony.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 32 points 5 hours ago

The DNC could have let him win instead of cheating him out of the primary in 2016, we should have had a green new deal by now.

[–] stopdropandprole@lemmy.world 80 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

a singular politician. he's going to die on the job, in the middle of an impassioned speech on behalf of the working class. indefatigable. not even Lincoln or Kennedy had a fraction of the perseverance and consistency this man has demonstrated. a true public servant.

[–] robbinhood@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago

Eh, I don't know. Lincoln was well aware that he was walking into a massively complex situation with nothing short of the future of the country 100% on the line. He knew he was doing it at great personal risk, and I am sure on some level he knew it could (and ultimately, would) cost him his life.

Lincoln's life was cut short so ultimately we never got to see what the next phase of his life would look like, but he persevered in the face of the greatest struggle this nation has ever faced.

Trump and friends may well create as dangerous of a scenario as the civil war, especially if Thiel, Vance, and the other tech authoritarians achieve their goal of radically overhauling if not outright destroying the country.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 35 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

Three words:

A

O

C

  • Signed, a very hopeful Canadian.
[–] NotLemming@lemm.ee 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

In an ideal world, but haven't we learned that she's too female and probably not white enough for America? *I don't agree, but I'm being pragmatic

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

In an ideal world, but haven’t we learned that she’s too female and probably not white enough for America?

The entire point behind "Kamala lost because she's a woman of color, not because she wouldn't differ from her unpopular predecessor except to move to his right" is to shut out AOC in particular. The party is willing to hold back all women in order to stifle one person, and it's gross.

[–] NotLemming@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The fact is that many Americans wouldn't vote for a woman, and combining that with the ones who wouldn't vote for a person of colour is a bad idea, especially when the alternative for president is so dire.

I do think that the fact she wouldn't support Palestine/condemn Israel was a factor too, but if she had, that would have set Israel against her and lost more votes, especially due to all the media Zionists control and their lobbying power.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 48 minutes ago

The fact is that many Americans wouldn’t vote for a woman, and combining that with the ones who wouldn’t vote for a person of colour is a bad idea

So long as a progressive is a possibility and no tone femtosecond longer.

I do think that the fact she wouldn’t support Palestine/condemn Israel was a factor too, but if she had, that would have set Israel against her and lost more votes

So we have to (and you get to) support genocide forever too!

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 13 points 7 hours ago

Also signed a slightly hopeful American

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 67 points 9 hours ago

This is the man that should be the U.S. president. Not the fucking fascist rapist felon who’s all cozied up to Russian Putin scum.

[–] otto@sh.itjust.works 42 points 10 hours ago

Just imagine if he had been elected president in 2016 like he should’ve been

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 21 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

I've felt that Bernie should be president since 2015, but he never stood a chance in the US. You have a 0% chance of being elected president in this country once the label of "socialist" has been applied to you.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

They called Obama a socialist.

[–] NotLemming@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

True. People need to learn what socialist actually means. Much of Europe is socialist.

[–] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 33 minutes ago

no we arent. having social policies doesnt make a state socialist

[–] Lostinblogs@lemmy.world 1 points 17 minutes ago

Thus demonstrating that people do indeed need to learn what socialist actually means!!

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 24 points 9 hours ago (8 children)

You say that but articles like this don't fit that narrative. There are Republican voters who like Bernie and they have been showing up to his rallies for years. I know several Trump voters who have said they would have voted for Sanders if they got the chance. The idea that progressives don't appeal to conservatives is neoliberal propaganda. Progressives hit on alot of the same problems as conservative politicians they just have different solutions (and a lot less bullshit). Neoliberalism just pretends that the status quo is fine. Despite the name conservatives are largely unhappy with the status quo. That's how we got Trump.

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Brother, who the hell says they’re a fan of Sanders and then willingly votes for Trump other than chaos agents or racist who want to bury social issues?

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 24 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

More than you think. Trump is a fascist piece of shit but he's not wrong when he says the system is rigged and drastic change is needed. Replace Trump's Nazi rhetoric and egoism with workable ideas and genuine empathy and in simplistic terms you have Sanders.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, a not-insignificant portion of Trump's voters are people who have been shafted by the system and are desperate for change, any change. Two out of three times, Trump was the candidate offering change. That he's destroying stuff is, to them, secondary at best because they think their lives can't get much worse anyway.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Xempathy@lemmy.world 38 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Watched it live. Glad there are still come politicians fighting back.

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 39 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

And he's always been fighting back. Dudes been an activist for what, the last 50 years or so?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 47 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Get your families to go to this.

[–] misterdoctor@lemmy.world 17 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I haven’t had any luck so I’m hijacking this comment to ask: does anyone know where we can find dates for his speaking tour? I want to bring my family to hear him but I don’t know when he’ll be in our neck of the woods.

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

They maybe advertising the dates on social media like bluesky and x? I'm on neither but probably a good place to look.

I'd love to get a few videos from his speeches to share with people to hopefully build more energy around this.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

This is a good question. I honestly don't see any announcements anywhere about next stops. Maybe they're not advertising it...for obvious reasons.

[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 32 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I got my mittens and knitted hat still....

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 hours ago

I still have my official shirt from 2016

[–] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 23 points 11 hours ago

Hell yeah. One of the few good ones.

load more comments
view more: next ›