this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
378 points (91.6% liked)

Memes

47175 readers
1368 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 21 hours ago (24 children)

I blocked .world because it's a centrist shit hole that serves to do nothing but piss me off with whiners who don't do shit about fuck complaining about tankies and fascists as though their no side taking ass even has a fucking seat at the table.

Fuck .world

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm quite deliberately avoiding lemmy.world, so no, we shouldn't just put everything on there.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Haaveilija@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

How about rebasing instead of merging to get a more linear meme history?

[–] NahMarcas@lemmy.ml 2 points 17 hours ago

I agree, theres no need to fight

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 21 hours ago

MAKE .WORLD EVERYTHING!

Õr mãybê dõñ't

[–] kplaceholder@lemmy.ml 91 points 1 day ago (5 children)

There was some proposal that I have seen multiple times on Lemmy and at least once on the GitHub repo that communities should be able to subscribe to each other much like users can subscribe to communities. I vastly prefer this to other proposals such as auto-merging communities with the same name, which I can think of a few ways that can go wrong.

It would also be reasonably intuitive for the average user, since following stuff is already a familiar action you take on social media. You wouldn't really need to understand the quirks of federation to know why posting to one community makes it appear on other downstream communities. And as far as I know about ActivityPub (which is admittedly not much), it's not a stretch use it to implement a feature like this.

I wonder if this proposal ever reached anywhere.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world -1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The chronically online weirdos on world don't like the chronically online weirdos on ml. They are both chronically online weirdos and I try to view these really active communities or names I recognize like a zoo. These people are throwing shit at eachother for our amusement. Keep it separate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 21 hours ago

It would be tight if there was a local option(What we have now) and a All option that let's you see all the communities across all federated spaces that share that same name.

[–] blackberry@midwest.social 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

isn't the point of the fediverse to not consolidate?

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago

Options are better than useless limitations (ignoring scope creep)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›