this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
429 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

61344 readers
4846 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Decoupling America’s Artificial Intelligence Capabilities from China Act of 2025’’.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITIONS ON IMPORT AND EXPORT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE OR GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY OR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

(a) PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION.—On and after the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the importation into the United States of artificial intelligence or generative artificial intelligence technology or intellectual property developed or produced in the People’s Republic of China is prohibited.

Currently, China has the best open source models in text, video and music generation.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 minutes ago
[–] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 4 points 55 minutes ago

This would also effectively ban the use of any research produced by a Chinese national. Any papers which cite the work of Chinese labs (most of them) would be illegal, as this could be interpreted as aiding Chinese AI research.

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 13 points 3 hours ago

China : Discovers Anti-gravity
USA : Law preventing study of anti-gravity

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 12 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Good luck trying to ban OSS next, which would criminalize basically everyone who's ever used a browser that isn't IE, everyone who's ever used an Android phone or a Chromebook, everyone who's ever used any modern audio or video codec as the bulk of those are OSS too, and would destroy both Big Data and the Cloud, both of which are primarily Linux-based, and send the US back to the web's dark ages.

Also, since this bill punishes people by making them spend most of their lives in prison, how are they going to lock up everyone who’s ever used Chromium or Firefox browsers, for example, or everyone who’s ever used Android or ChromeOS, which is most of the country’s population at this point, should that ban extend to a general OSS ban? (this part was originally a reply but I moved it to the main post)

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 5 points 4 hours ago

BuT tHe FrEe mArKeT

[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

ngl them not wanting me to download it makes me want to download it more than anything else, and I'm usually against ai

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 29 points 8 hours ago

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 18 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the "free market" in action.

We are rotten to the core.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago

Not me. It's the rest of you.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 25 points 9 hours ago

They are afraid. Very afraid. Good.

[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 21 points 9 hours ago

Time to start seeding DeepSeek R1 I guess.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 10 points 9 hours ago

Awesome, so on top of all the other crap, like a economy that is going off a cliff, the US wants to actually get further behind on AI, just so that assman van make a few extra dollars

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 29 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I thought software and thus code was protected as free speech?

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Free speech and expression is one of the many previously-thought-to-be-inalienable rights that are in the current administration's crosshairs. If I could flee this country for, say, the Netherlands, I'd do so in a heartbeat, unfortunately I can't.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago (1 children)

The Netherlands would be high on my list, too. What a pleasant place.

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 2 points 4 minutes ago (1 children)

NJB's praise of their infrastructure would have me sold on them if I could actually flee the US.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 1 points 1 minute ago

Not Just Bikes.

[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago

The right to free speak can be compromised if it interferes with other, more important rights...

... like the right of shareholders to make money.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The paste does not go back in the tube....

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 14 minutes ago

It can if you kind of squeeze the tube a little bit and then let it suck the paste back in. But it's really tedious.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 50 points 15 hours ago

Capitalism truly thrives on competition and innovation

[–] daddy32@lemmy.world 34 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

8 words: hilary clinton ai voice talking about ball sucking

[–] Goun@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago* (last edited 12 minutes ago)

The benefit of being an early adopter is my folder full of Donald Trump/Congressional Republicans suckin' and fuckin' before all of the fun models got taken down from easy access.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 42 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

So you can't download them, you should run them directly on tencent cloud or something? Smart...

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I don't even like ai but this just makes me want to download Deepseek as much as I can

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 54 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

US is getting very desperate

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

This is why we gotta ban TikTok!!!! \s

Seriously tho it's a bummer to see how many people here promote all this horseshit.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 19 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Being open weights, if I, resident of Ijustmadeitupista n take it and make a very slight tweak, would it be OK for this rule?

And, if my pal from China takes a US open model and tweaks it to criticize CCP, will it be banned?

I honestly think politicians should think just a bit before trying to legislate things they clearly don't understand.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 1 points 28 minutes ago

The way it's written, it sounds like we could download it in the US, after the law was passed, for 180 days, and then do whatever we want with it. Unfortunately, after that point, the test of it being "developed" in China would probably be met for anything but a near-total rewrite.

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Just try to stop me. Or anyone for that matter.

The "does it connect to the wifi" mfers came up with this one I'm sure.

[–] artificialfish@programming.dev 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly.

We will just put Trump porn on the whitehouse.gov site to show you how little control America has over its digital economy.

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago

Hey deepseek. Remake Lemon Party but with Trump, Vance, and Elon.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 16 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I'd like to point out that it is only one single proposal. If this does not get shut down, then it is time to be worried. But for now, it might just be one glue-sniffing Congressperson sniffing the wrong kind of glue one morning.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It is a single proposal but maybe anybody with an extra terabyte sitting around might want to hold on to a copy

[–] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I already have every version downloaded on my nas, more cause I hate redownloading things and am a pack rat.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago
[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 55 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

It is much worse. I hope I am reading it wrong, but:

The term ‘‘technology’’ [...] includes [...] any semiconductor, circuit board, operating system, graphics processing unit, central processing unit, tenor processing unit, field-programmable gate array, random access memory, hard drive, solid-state drive, dataflow architecture, or cloud-computing service, that is manufactured, designed, developed, supplied, deployed, completed, [...] [etc.] to function artificial intelligence [...] and any other hardware, software, equipment, device, component, robotic computer, processor, network [...] that is manufactured, designed, developed, supplied, deployed, [...] [etc.] to function artificial intelligence or generative artificial intelligence.

This would mean that importing and exporting literally any piece of IT equipment, from a Ubuntu installer to a RAM chip, is illegal. Good luck & have fun.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 36 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

It's good old "everything is now illegal" law, selective enforcement does the rest. Straight out of the young dictatorship handbook

[–] ShortFuse@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 27 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Government banned Chinese AI?

Step 1: ask a friend from any other country to fork the model (brotip: use magnets for faster acquiring a friend)

Step 2: have your friend rename the AI.

Step 3: now the model is from said country.

Step 4: download the model from said fork.

OpenAI will go bankrupt. US Government will be jelly. Problem?

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago

the law isn't meant to bar you from downloading it. it's meant to prevent use in a business setting

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'm surprised usually Hawley is pro running

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›