this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
325 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

61344 readers
4762 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Decoupling America’s Artificial Intelligence Capabilities from China Act of 2025’’.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITIONS ON IMPORT AND EXPORT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE OR GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY OR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

(a) PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION.—On and after the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the importation into the United States of artificial intelligence or generative artificial intelligence technology or intellectual property developed or produced in the People’s Republic of China is prohibited.

Currently, China has the best open source models in text, video and music generation.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 hours ago

I thought software and thus code was protected as free speech?

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 36 points 9 hours ago

Capitalism truly thrives on competition and innovation

[–] daddy32@lemmy.world 23 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

8 words: hilary clinton ai voice talking about ball sucking

[–] Goun@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 hours ago

Alright, now I'm hooked

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

This is why we gotta ban TikTok!!!! \s

Seriously tho it's a bummer to see how many people here promote all this horseshit.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 34 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So you can't download them, you should run them directly on tencent cloud or something? Smart...

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I don't even like ai but this just makes me want to download Deepseek as much as I can

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 43 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

US is getting very desperate

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

Just try to stop me. Or anyone for that matter.

The "does it connect to the wifi" mfers came up with this one I'm sure.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 10 points 10 hours ago

Being open weights, if I, resident of Ijustmadeitupista n take it and make a very slight tweak, would it be OK for this rule?

And, if my pal from China takes a US open model and tweaks it to criticize CCP, will it be banned?

I honestly think politicians should think just a bit before trying to legislate things they clearly don't understand.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I'm surprised usually Hawley is pro running

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 2 points 7 hours ago

This is running. It's running away from competition.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I'd like to point out that it is only one single proposal. If this does not get shut down, then it is time to be worried. But for now, it might just be one glue-sniffing Congressperson sniffing the wrong kind of glue one morning.

[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 18 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Government banned Chinese AI?

Step 1: ask a friend from any other country to fork the model (brotip: use magnets for faster acquiring a friend)

Step 2: have your friend rename the AI.

Step 3: now the model is from said country.

Step 4: download the model from said fork.

OpenAI will go bankrupt. US Government will be jelly. Problem?

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

the law isn't meant to bar you from downloading it. it's meant to prevent use in a business setting

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 42 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

It is much worse. I hope I am reading it wrong, but:

The term ‘‘technology’’ [...] includes [...] any semiconductor, circuit board, operating system, graphics processing unit, central processing unit, tenor processing unit, field-programmable gate array, random access memory, hard drive, solid-state drive, dataflow architecture, or cloud-computing service, that is manufactured, designed, developed, supplied, deployed, completed, [...] [etc.] to function artificial intelligence [...] and any other hardware, software, equipment, device, component, robotic computer, processor, network [...] that is manufactured, designed, developed, supplied, deployed, [...] [etc.] to function artificial intelligence or generative artificial intelligence.

This would mean that importing and exporting literally any piece of IT equipment, from a Ubuntu installer to a RAM chip, is illegal. Good luck & have fun.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 22 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

It's good old "everything is now illegal" law, selective enforcement does the rest. Straight out of the young dictatorship handbook

[–] ShortFuse@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

Rip iPhone.

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 58 points 16 hours ago

Oh what’s that? Yeah that’s Barbara Streisand’s house

[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago

So, only the rest of the world gets superior technology.

The investors will love that.

[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee 12 points 12 hours ago

Torrenting is going to be wild in 2025.

[–] JOMusic@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

I was playing this whole thing out in my head, and trying to justify the confidence of Trump and pals with such seemingly stupid moves. The only thing I can think of is that they believe that the money they will save (steal) from the government cuts, etc, will make up for the huge losses from the tariffs. And then they would have to believe that their internal AI development is at a point where they can overpower every other nation on earth, and so they don't need those international relations anymore. I mean, technically every single Tesla in the world is a camera for Elon, and a huge percentage of internet traffic goes through US servers.

But then I think, even if they do have all of these advantages, China seems to be catching up pretty quickly, is allied with over 50% of the planet through BRICS, has protected itself from their technological expansion. This is not even including that most other countries in the world will probably want to distance themselves from the US if this keeps up.

Either I'm in denial, or it really is just Trump and Elon are being blinded by their overinflated egos.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

There's always the worst possible option: they're true believers. They genuinely believe the rest of the world is freeloading on the US, and that (atlas) shrugging them off will make everyone else collapse.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2069436850145993

50 States, 50 Protests, 1day

Feb 5 @ your downtown.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 134 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (3 children)

These fucking clowns just refuse to learn about how technology works. Fucking morons.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 18 points 14 hours ago

This bill is likely sponsored by Sam Altman himself

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 27 points 18 hours ago

The generation that can't figure out their TV remote is attempting to legislate on cutting edge technology. Fucking series of tubes all over again. It never stopped though really.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 5 points 14 hours ago

You don't expect this law to count for the people at the top, do you?

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 31 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Well, now I'm downloading them all and backing them up.

And the ones I can, I'm going to fork on GitHub just so they have my name.

Bring it on.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 hours ago

Don't fork them, because when a project get taken down, so do all the forks. Download it, and manually create a new repo.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 84 points 19 hours ago (15 children)

I'm not even in to this shit and I'm going to download it right now because fuck those assholes.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 6 points 12 hours ago

This is designed to stop businesses to use locally deployed models and be forced to deploy cloud services by any of the cocksuckers that sat frontlins in the inauguration.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 20 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

In other news, Chinese restaurants will serve only burgers, fries and shakes, and will be called Freedom restaurants.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 55 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

Ah, the supporters of the free market strike again. No competition allowed, Sam Altman and his American billionaire peers are entitled to all the money.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world 30 points 18 hours ago

Had to lookup the penalties since this document just pointed somewhere else:

(a) In General.--Section 206 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) is amended to read as follows:

SEC. 206. PENALTIES.

  • (a) Unlawful Acts.--It shall be unlawful for a person to violate, attempt to violate, conspire to violate, or cause a violation of any license, order, regulation, or prohibition issued under this title.
  • (b) Civil Penalty.--A civil penalty may be imposed on any person who commits an unlawful act described in subsection (a) in an amount not to exceed the greater of--
    • (1) $250,000; or
    • (2) an amount that is twice the amount of the transaction that is the basis of the violation with respect to which the penalty is imposed.
  • (c) Criminal Penalty.--A person who willfully commits, willfully attempts to commit, or willfully conspires to commit, or aids or abets in the commission of, an unlawful act described in subsection (a) shall, upon conviction, be fined not more than $1,000,000, or if a natural person, may be imprisoned for not more than 20 years, or both.''.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-110publ96/html/PLAW-110publ96.htm

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 49 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Lol, protectionism for the administration's fellators.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 33 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

What next? Outlaw chinese food?

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

A succulent Chinese meal!?

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 9 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

We'll call it FREEDOM FOOD. Please, pass the FREEDOM beef chow fun, and the AMERICAN Fortune cookies, and BALD EAGLE AR-15 green tea.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 28 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

This country is so cooked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 32 points 20 hours ago

Josh Hawley is a complete waste.

load more comments
view more: next ›