this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
399 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

61344 readers
4575 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Decoupling America’s Artificial Intelligence Capabilities from China Act of 2025’’.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITIONS ON IMPORT AND EXPORT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE OR GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY OR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

(a) PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION.—On and after the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the importation into the United States of artificial intelligence or generative artificial intelligence technology or intellectual property developed or produced in the People’s Republic of China is prohibited.

Currently, China has the best open source models in text, video and music generation.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Good luck trying to ban OSS next, which would criminalize basically everyone who's ever used a browser that isn't IE, everyone who's ever used an Android phone or a Chromebook, everyone who's ever used any modern audio or video codec as the bulk of those are OSS too, and would destroy both Big Data and the Cloud, both of which are primarily Linux-based, and send the US back to the web's dark ages.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 1 hour ago

BuT tHe FrEe mArKeT

[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

ngl them not wanting me to download it makes me want to download it more than anything else, and I'm usually against ai

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 19 points 5 hours ago

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago

Ah yes, the "free market" in action.

We are rotten to the core.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 20 points 7 hours ago

They are afraid. Very afraid. Good.

[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 16 points 7 hours ago

Time to start seeding DeepSeek R1 I guess.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 hours ago

Awesome, so on top of all the other crap, like a economy that is going off a cliff, the US wants to actually get further behind on AI, just so that assman van make a few extra dollars

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 25 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I thought software and thus code was protected as free speech?

[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

The right to free speak can be compromised if it interferes with other, more important rights...

... like the right of shareholders to make money.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

The paste does not go back in the tube....

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 46 points 12 hours ago

Capitalism truly thrives on competition and innovation

[–] daddy32@lemmy.world 30 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

8 words: hilary clinton ai voice talking about ball sucking

[–] Goun@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago

Alright, now I'm hooked

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 40 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So you can't download them, you should run them directly on tencent cloud or something? Smart...

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I don't even like ai but this just makes me want to download Deepseek as much as I can

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 53 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

US is getting very desperate

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

This is why we gotta ban TikTok!!!! \s

Seriously tho it's a bummer to see how many people here promote all this horseshit.

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Just try to stop me. Or anyone for that matter.

The "does it connect to the wifi" mfers came up with this one I'm sure.

[–] artificialfish@programming.dev 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly.

We will just put Trump porn on the whitehouse.gov site to show you how little control America has over its digital economy.

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

Hey deepseek. Remake Lemon Party but with Trump, Vance, and Elon.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 16 points 13 hours ago

Being open weights, if I, resident of Ijustmadeitupista n take it and make a very slight tweak, would it be OK for this rule?

And, if my pal from China takes a US open model and tweaks it to criticize CCP, will it be banned?

I honestly think politicians should think just a bit before trying to legislate things they clearly don't understand.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 14 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I'd like to point out that it is only one single proposal. If this does not get shut down, then it is time to be worried. But for now, it might just be one glue-sniffing Congressperson sniffing the wrong kind of glue one morning.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It is a single proposal but maybe anybody with an extra terabyte sitting around might want to hold on to a copy

[–] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I already have every version downloaded on my nas, more cause I hate redownloading things and am a pack rat.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago
[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 52 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

It is much worse. I hope I am reading it wrong, but:

The term ‘‘technology’’ [...] includes [...] any semiconductor, circuit board, operating system, graphics processing unit, central processing unit, tenor processing unit, field-programmable gate array, random access memory, hard drive, solid-state drive, dataflow architecture, or cloud-computing service, that is manufactured, designed, developed, supplied, deployed, completed, [...] [etc.] to function artificial intelligence [...] and any other hardware, software, equipment, device, component, robotic computer, processor, network [...] that is manufactured, designed, developed, supplied, deployed, [...] [etc.] to function artificial intelligence or generative artificial intelligence.

This would mean that importing and exporting literally any piece of IT equipment, from a Ubuntu installer to a RAM chip, is illegal. Good luck & have fun.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 33 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

It's good old "everything is now illegal" law, selective enforcement does the rest. Straight out of the young dictatorship handbook

[–] ShortFuse@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

Yes, yes, burn it all. Make the people very very angry. It takes a lot to engage a Luddite and we need them all.

[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 24 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Government banned Chinese AI?

Step 1: ask a friend from any other country to fork the model (brotip: use magnets for faster acquiring a friend)

Step 2: have your friend rename the AI.

Step 3: now the model is from said country.

Step 4: download the model from said fork.

OpenAI will go bankrupt. US Government will be jelly. Problem?

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

the law isn't meant to bar you from downloading it. it's meant to prevent use in a business setting

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I'm surprised usually Hawley is pro running

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 3 points 10 hours ago

This is running. It's running away from competition.

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 63 points 19 hours ago

Oh what’s that? Yeah that’s Barbara Streisand’s house

[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 23 points 17 hours ago

So, only the rest of the world gets superior technology.

The investors will love that.

[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Torrenting is going to be wild in 2025.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago

At least until they decide to Make it illegal for ISPs to allow you to torrent.

And yes I hear all the people saying can't, won't, laws, to which I say those things are all tenuous at best at the moment.

[–] JOMusic@lemmy.ml 8 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

I was playing this whole thing out in my head, and trying to justify the confidence of Trump and pals with such seemingly stupid moves. The only thing I can think of is that they believe that the money they will save (steal) from the government cuts, etc, will make up for the huge losses from the tariffs. And then they would have to believe that their internal AI development is at a point where they can overpower every other nation on earth, and so they don't need those international relations anymore. I mean, technically every single Tesla in the world is a camera for Elon, and a huge percentage of internet traffic goes through US servers.

But then I think, even if they do have all of these advantages, China seems to be catching up pretty quickly, is allied with over 50% of the planet through BRICS, has protected itself from their technological expansion. This is not even including that most other countries in the world will probably want to distance themselves from the US if this keeps up.

Either I'm in denial, or it really is just Trump and Elon are being blinded by their overinflated egos.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

There's always the worst possible option: they're true believers. They genuinely believe the rest of the world is freeloading on the US, and that (atlas) shrugging them off will make everyone else collapse.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 152 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (4 children)

These fucking clowns just refuse to learn about how technology works. Fucking morons.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

its probably not about that though.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 22 points 17 hours ago

This bill is likely sponsored by Sam Altman himself

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 91 points 22 hours ago (15 children)

I'm not even in to this shit and I'm going to download it right now because fuck those assholes.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 33 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Well, now I'm downloading them all and backing them up.

And the ones I can, I'm going to fork on GitHub just so they have my name.

Bring it on.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 12 hours ago

Don't fork them, because when a project get taken down, so do all the forks. Download it, and manually create a new repo.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 64 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Ah, the supporters of the free market strike again. No competition allowed, Sam Altman and his American billionaire peers are entitled to all the money.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›