this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
211 points (98.6% liked)

Privacy

33195 readers
262 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm fully down with this as long as any model that is trained on publicly accessible data follows these rules:

  1. All media that is imported his cataloged, I want to know what's in the model

  2. The weights are open

  3. The model is made publicly available.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

I am all for publicly available models.

[–] Wolfie@lemm.ee 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not from England, but damm this is absolutely terrible. England already has a LOT of cameras everywhere to track people. They work hard to try and track people everywhere. Hence why this is scary cause this might actually go through due to how anti-privacy they seem to be.

[–] dicksteele@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They do track a lot, for no real good reason either. Most of the cctv systems you see are blurry, especially at distance, storage of high quality video takes a lot of space and money I guess. It’s a crime deterrent at best but lately most criminals don’t really give a damn, you see wannabe gangsters riding around on bicycles or scooters with balaclavas on, so the real criminals can blend right in with the wannabes. Police presence only seems to exist when football is being played also. This joke of a country could do with a reset button, probably been that way for a long time.

[–] far_university190@feddit.org 1 points 22 hours ago

reset button

Best can do drop the sun into parliament.

[–] barryamelton@lemmy.ml 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Copyright and license laws for you, not for me. This is the biggest theft ever.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Intellectual property are rights for the rich. A perversion of science and art used to commercialize our culture. Creating artificial scarcity while denying that all science and art are built from copying and iterative development.

We could abolish it completely and it would cause an explosion of creativity and innovation like we have never seen before.

[–] skribe@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, nah. While copyrights are a problem as they're currently employed, removing them would screw every content creator on the planet. Most of us don't make much as it is, with only a few making a living from our work. Removing copyright would allow anyone to take what we produce without any compensation.

The corporations would love that.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Content creators are not protected by copyright unless they have anywhere between $50k-300k and months of their time to waste an litigation.

The average cost for a federal copyright case is $278,000. Let's stop pretending this is for the little guy.

Most importantly you are only looking at the utility of Intellectual property to make money. Art and science exist outside this realm for thousands of years without it.

We are to sacrifice the way science and art have always worked so supposedly content creators can make money. If this is your argument I will have to take a hard pass.

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 day ago

In theory, the law applies to everyone. In practice, it doesn't apply to rich entities.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How opt-out will work in practice:

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not sure if this was on purpose, but it seemed quite appropriate

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago

It's Lisa looking at a sign that reads:

"Keep Out"

"Or Enter. I'm a sign, not a cop."

[–] HotCoffee@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago

Uk really is one of the worst countries with regards to privacy. Always trying to pass some shit that enables them to spy on you. Last year they wanted backdoors in all messengers, now this.

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I support this if it applies to everyone, not just AI. We should be able to use everything that we see as well

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 18 points 1 day ago

Open source the planet.

[–] barryamelton@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago

How do you opt out for already created content in the past?

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

If any rando can see it, the robot can see it.

Not interested enough to support corpo media please post it on peertube if you can. but from the headline: yikes! And I thought they were done with the most vile political idiocy.

[–] kekmacska@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] bigFab@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] kekmacska@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 hours ago

it was in the same sublemmy if i can remember, around early december