this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
141 points (99.3% liked)

Books

5097 readers
53 users here now

A community for all things related to Books.

Rules

  1. Be Nice. No personal attacks or hate speech.
  2. No spam. All posts should be related to books.

Official Bingo Posts:

Related Communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sounds like PR just to advertise the Authors Guild. Nobody looking for the latest bestsellers in their favorite genre is gonna run across anything AI written.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 11 points 1 month ago

Perhaps, but often best sellers are trash in various readers opinions. If you are searching out smaller authors because you believe they write better books you will come across a lot of AI.

As one of those who believe best sellers are generally trash, there are a much larger number of small authors who are even worse than any best seller. Still I search them out because the tiny minority who write gems. (again the is my subjective opinion)

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Never say never. A lot of popular books in more pulpy genres like romance or mystery are already incredibly formulaic. It wouldn't be too outlandish for some publisher to just feed in a massive corpus of genre fiction into an LLM and plop out dozens of books indistinguishable from those written by people.

They're not my cup of tea, but they keep landing on bestseller lists because people like what they like.

I'm assuming we are also going to eventually get to a point where large publishers are just going to start using AI reviewers to give books written by human authors a once-over to suggest "improvements" that could make the book more marketable or consumable.

Independently published works are going to eventually be the only way going forward.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How in the world do they propose to prove it?

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They don't have to, but they can have it copyrighted and only hand it out to people they want to effectively sowing doubt in any book that lacks it.

This is a great tactic to drive Author's Guild membership.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"lead free Cheerios", I guess. You may be write.

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Exactly that.

[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I was just thinking "So they're going to force the authors to always write on a video feed like school children to 'prove' they aren't cheating? Uh huh..."

Maybe they should make a label assuring us the author isn't a bigot, hasn't committed any hate or sex crimes, and that they exclusively have "the right" opinions?

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

Gatekeeping and centralizing power... I'm sure it will go well.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 6 points 1 month ago

I feel now I should write a book to get this useful certification.

[–] rauls4@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I've successfully navigated many recaptchas. Where's my certificate?