this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
539 points (96.4% liked)

Not The Onion

13035 readers
1820 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Vice President JD Vance said Saturday that "we believe fundamentally that big tech does have too much power," despite the prominent positioning of tech CEOs at President Trump's inauguration last week.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 13 points 6 days ago

It's a Good Thing then that a Tech Bro didn't just buy the President Of The United States!

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

He's just jealous of Musk. He wants to be Trump's buddy more than anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheMC42@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Don't worry JD, this will sort itself out thanks to Zuckerberg and Musk driving people to alternative platforms.

[–] labbbb2@thelemmy.club 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

These authoritarian populist tactics, after those people who voted for them (or will be able to vote) will say like "and you said that this person is bad!"

They use the same tactic in Russia regularly. When politicians destroyed life of millions of people, after some time one poitician in Duma will say the right thing or propose a law for popular social issue, like "we're against domestic violence" (domestic violence is common in this shithole), or on "elections" they will offer sausage or money for a vote to population.

I don't know what they are trying to achieve by that, but maybe that people will restore trust in them, and will continue to believe that "BS-democracy". And after that these politicians who support dictatorship will continue to launder resources from the country. But in Russia they do that because they need people to participate in pseudo-elections, that will legitimize their fascist regime.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 days ago

Who would ever give a shit what these clowns think? How is this news?

Oh right we're violently controlled by these wackos...

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

That interview was interesting

She kept trying to get him to fall into traps or get angry but he was calm and respectful the entire time. This man is someone who can talk.

[–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago

He lies and twists facts constantly. Plus he’s annoying as hell, for whatever that’s worth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] killea@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

But his entire political career was purchased by big tech! Is he a malfunctioning robot or something?

[–] Eggyhead@fedia.io 6 points 5 days ago

In other words, he’s suggesting his pockets need a little more lining.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Especially couchdb. Couchdb needs to get back in the kitchen where she belongs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Wait until Big Tech buys those nuclear reactors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

"the big tech that we do not directly control has too much power". FFY

wow, really?!

Can't be

1000045426

[–] Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago

I say that the executive branch has not been given the power to create laws or judge whether or not they are legal... but that seems to be what his administration has unilaterally decided is true now.

The laws are on the books. They should be implemented in good faith by the executive branch. This is not being done.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›