this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
78 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

6229 readers
218 users here now

All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.

See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC


Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 5 points 2 hours ago

Is he gonna sign one to abolish gravity too?

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 4 points 3 hours ago

I'm thinking trump and the Republican party are really bad, like cruel and stupid bad, and maybe we shouldn't let them give orders anymore.

[–] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 4 hours ago

How do I cross post?

[–] millie@beehaw.org 33 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

I always find it weird that conservatives think this is some kind of gotcha for binary trans people. Like, okay, this is a shitty thing to say to nonbinary or intersex people and is both untrue and cruel. But how is this relevant to me, a binary trans woman?

Like.. hello my gender isn't 'trans', it's 'woman'. Idiots.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 7 points 5 hours ago

First they came for the enbies

[–] vfsh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

In fairness part of the decree is that it also can't be changed, so definitely still an impact to both binary and nonbinary trans folks. Also love the downplay of enby impacts, if it doesn't impact you it doesn't matter?

[–] millie@beehaw.org 1 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Read my post before you reply to it. Thanks.

[–] Alice@beehaw.org 9 points 5 hours ago

How does your post contradict what they said? You asked how it impacts a binary trans person, and they explained that the part about it being unchangeable is supposed to target y'all (and all trans people).

I know a lot of us, probably most of us, haven't changed so much as taken ownership of who we always were. So yeah I guess technically this order isn't a "gotcha", but unfortunately that's not how transphobes see it. :(

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 11 points 6 hours ago

They did and you're being unnecessarily rude.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

From the article:

The definition of male and female will be based on whether people are born with eggs or sperm, rather than on their chromosomes.

What did you say your gender was?

[–] millie@beehaw.org 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Well nobody is born with sperm so..

[–] Aaron@lemmy.nz 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] millie@beehaw.org 4 points 3 hours ago (2 children)
[–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 1 points 2 hours ago

True Feminism means acknowledging that women can be just as fallible as men.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Not sure I'd call a world made up of breeders, the undesirable, and Elon's sperm bank, much of an utopia.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

How do they confirm that? Surgery?

[–] its_me_xiphos@beehaw.org 26 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

This is an executive order, not a law. That doesn't make it any less terrible, however. Those commenting it is just political posturing are seriously misinformed at the wide range and scope this action will (not might, not could, WILL) have on you. Anything even tangentially related to getting work done, grants made, research funded with the federal government will be effected. In brief, the scope and impact of an executive order can vary greatly depending on the specific issue and the details of the order itself. This one will likely be meant to ensure that grant making, contracts, research, and legal recourse for those not subscribing to it's narrow and, frankly, archaic definitions will have a very difficult time interacting with the federal government in a variety of ways. But again, we are entering uncharted territory where the legislative, judicial, and executive are now all openly corrupt and willing to harm and hinder rather than help people.

I don't think the general public realizes the sheer insanity of the new government and their willingness to go far to harm people they don't like or don't agree with. Therein lies the real danger. How this EO will be interpreted and executed across the executive branch will be purposefully cruel and targeted. With the recent spat of boot licking in SCOTUS, I fear we're all in for a world of hurt. I'm just an ally, and I'm telling you that you absolutely must not bury your head in the sand on this one. You have to find ways to either protect yourself or protest/contest in a way you deem necessary for your health and well-being. Even a simple act of protest can mean a world of difference to those who are and will suffer.

The only bright side is an Executive Order ONLY effects federal branches of government under authority of the President. They can be undone by future presidents and challenged/overturned after judicial review. Remember the "Muslim ban?" That was one example.

So please, I beg you, do not brush this off as a Trumpism. This is meant to unleash the powers of hate, ignorance, and brutality that will latch onto as permission to be complete assholes.

[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Jfc this is going to affect intersex people more than trans people.

We were just at the cusp of addressing how fucked up fitting intersex people into one of two boxes is.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 63 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (4 children)

Ok.

He's wrong and we'll all just ignore him and continue existing.

Medical science will continue showing that sex isn't and never has been a binary either.

Laws can't override nature.

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Problem is this means that things we were hoping to get like having hormone replacement therapy actually approved by the FDA for use for transgender care will not happen and any enforcement of anti-discrimination or laws against hate speech at the federal level will no longer apply to trans and non-binary people. This will allow, for example, insurance companies to not have to cover transgender care. There is already a huge waiting list for people who are seeking care in the US due to the lack of specialists (myself included), so that list is likely to get longer. And likely any doctors who might have been planning to take up transgender care specialties may have their programs lose their funding. It's a huge impact to a lot of areas of government and many industries to have the federal government not recognize transgender care as valid and not recognize non-binary people like me as people at all.

Also, I'm fortunate enough to live in a state that is friendly to transgender and non-binary people, but my employer is not based here, so the insurance I have doesn't have to obey local laws that don't allow for blanket policies banning coverage of transgender care. So, the federal laws do matter.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 11 points 12 hours ago

Thank you for the correction and expansion.

Hoping people will start making their own hormones etc. I understand the rest is shit though and I hope we can all start looking after each other instead.

[–] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If they could read they’d have some strong feelings about this reality

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The ability to read or not does not have anything to do with how much knowledge one can acquire, there are many ways to acquire knowledge.

Don't be ableist and harm people that don't deserve it please.

These people are just willfully ignorant fascists who think they can control reality

No need to ascribe any other features onto them that don't and won't harm them but will harm others.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It’s a reference to a joke from King of the Hill.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 4 points 11 hours ago

Okay, doesn't change it being ableist though.

[–] jdnewmil@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 hours ago

Doesn't stop politicians from trying...

[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

yeah, it's fine. this is all just political theater and posturing.

just use another name/ term for sex and move on.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 3 points 11 hours ago

Or better yet get rid of the whole concept and be specific to body parts etc.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 10 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Aaron@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 hours ago

Find community. Meet in person regularly if you can. Just existing in community is huge, if for nothing else than your own emotional, mental, and physical health. We are thinking of you all from outside the US 🫂

[–] chloyster@beehaw.org 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 8 hours ago

Many hugs. We'll get through this.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 31 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

He's probably going to sign an order to make everyone be nice to him next.

Yes, unironically.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 11 points 12 hours ago

this will more than likely get dragged through the courts for the entire term by multiple cases.

plus there's all the legislation that would have to be rewritten or repealed to support this 'policy', that would never get through congress without a larger moron majority than exists currently.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 11 points 12 hours ago

Legal laws can't change scientifically established theory. If he wants to do some unbiased research though...

...he'd probably prove himself wrong

[–] BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

The article title is misleading. It's true that there are only two sexes, but Trump's order is concerning gender, which is a spectrum.

[–] Sas@beehaw.org 24 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Intersex people popping out of existence upon reading your comment

[–] BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Male and female are the only sexes; intersex is just a blanket term for various medical conditions that describe abnormal development of sex characteristics.

[–] Alice@beehaw.org 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It's natural and harmless to have any combination of male and female sexual characteristics, even if it's uncommon. It's only considered medical condition because we decided it was.

My friend has a uterus and gonads. I have red hair and blue eyes. Both are super uncommon and neither has caused us any trouble, that's just how we're made.

I'd argue that male and female are just names for the ends of the spectrum.

[–] BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Yep. Nothing wrong with it. Everybody's abnormal in some way. Doesn't mean we should redefine scientific terms or "other" someone just because their abnormality has to do with sex characteristics.

Personally, I go out of my way to not be normal, but most people want to fit in, and especially don't want to be seen as different or lesser because of something they can't control.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 4 points 5 hours ago

And some of them are not obviously male or female from birth, but are given surgeries to force them into one or the other. Sometimes they get it wrong.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

So you're saying if you call a sex abnormal, it doesn't exist?

[–] BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Nobody said that. Nobody would say that. Be reasonable.

If you're actually interested in understanding what I'm saying, this article does a good job of explaining it in lay-friendly terms.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 hour ago

So, if neither variation of sex characteristics nor personal identity defines the category of sex, then how can we define it? The answer is simple. The category of biological sex is defined through what developmental pathway you went down for the production of either sperm or eggs--the two, and only two, gamete types.

Nah, variation in sex characteristics is a way better measure than gamete development, because variation in sex characteristics actually relates to the person as they exist now. Grown adult human beings are not gametes.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

There are scientifically more than two sexes. Something like 1-2% of all people are intersex.

[–] BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 minutes ago

You'd think that, but really, I suspect a lot of the confusion comes from the word itself. "Intersex" implies with its "inter-" prefix that something exists between the two sexes, thus implying the existence of a third (or more) sex.

But again, it's just a blanket term that covers a wide variety of medical conditions related to development of sex organs/characteristics.

And I shouldn't have to say this, but of course I'm not saying that one's anatomy has any influence on one's worth as a person. I'm not a monster. I'm just a stickler for semantic accuracy.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They will call it "multisex" and come up with treatments to "fix" the "medical issue".

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 5 points 5 hours ago

They already do that with the more obviously intersex children at birth.