this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
414 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59288 readers
4158 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 188 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I refuse to pay for ads to be delivered to me. Seeing them unpaid is bad enough and I avoid it at all costs. But I will not pay for ads.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even as a child, when we had cable, I would ask my dad why we still had to watch commercials even though we pay for the service. I understood why stations like CBS, NBC, or ABC may have needed ads as they were free over-the-air, but surely paying for cable should mean no ads, right?

Never had a good answer. It's pretty fucked up that we collectively allowed them to pull that shit on us and put up with it for like 3 decades.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There was a brief and glorious time when Pay Cable was billed as being ad-free. You would still see promos for other shows and channels between shows, but there were no commercial breaks!

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Same as BBC in the UK.

Maybe a 5-10 sec "And next on BBC 1 is blah blah and on BBC 2 we have blah blah starting at 7 o'clock"

Of course you "have" to pay for it, though (if you don't pay nobody would know).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whitecapstromgard@sh.itjust.works 120 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️

yo ho, a pirates life for me

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 44 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Would help if they still made content worth pirating.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I liked The Boys and Tales From The Loop. Couldn't tell you anything else they made though

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] cooopsspace@infosec.pub 88 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's literally a race to the bottom on streaming services before we eventually end up with cable in an app. Or rather multiple apps.

Fuck I hate this timeline.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

My ISP already offers a streaming package, you pay monthly for a package of streaming apps. It's literally cable with extra steps

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Finally, that's what everyone has been eagerly waiting for ...

[–] Ryantific_theory@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, what we were always missing after fleeing cable, was the ads that really made each show worth it.

Why can't we just have nice things?

[–] Guildo@feddit.de 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] obinice@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Better not be advert breaks in the service I PAY FOR, or else I'm out.

I'm not paying anybody to serve me adverts. Ever.

Their application is already god awful, and their database is built incredibly poorly (what idiot decided that different seasons of one TV show should have entirely separate listings in the database, often making it hard to find?!).

AND, they're constantly trying to shove extra paid stuff down my throat, like something called Paramount+, in the thing I'm already bloody paying for.

I'm already at the edge of my tether with these people for their crappy service. If they introduce advertisment breaks into a service I'm paying for? That would be a direct insult, and I don't stand for that sort of thing.

[–] 2ncs@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

their database is built incredibly poorly (what idiot decided that different seasons of one TV show should have entirely separate listings in the database, often making it hard to find?!).

Likely this is legacy from when you would buy each season as a DVD set

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GuerillaGorillas@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Wow, first they destroy Prime Music to push you to pay extra for Music Unlimited and now this? I have no idea what the value of Prime even is now unless you order online frequently, which is harder and harder to justify with all the shady and low quality sellers polluting the site.

[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People use prime video? I find that half the shit I click on, it tells me it's not included with prime and I have to buy it..

I hate this. Let me hide everything that isn't included.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been planning on cancelling prime at the end of the year. This closes the decision making process for me.

I've been sticking to Pluto and Tubi lately. Yes, they have ads, but they are entirely free and have enough content to keep me entertained for the duration of my ever decreasing television watching habits.

(End of year because due to terms and conditions, there is no benefit to cancel early)

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I see prime as a freebie. I get it cause I have prime for my package deliveries

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My experience with prime delivery in 2023 is that it has gone from two days to four days to two weeks to completely lost fuck you trying to get a refund.

Further, I stopped using eBay in the late 2000s because everything there became "fell off a truck in China" quality. This is what a vast percentage of Amazon product has become.

This is the crux desire to cancel.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 33 points 1 year ago

Prime already has ads and they are obnoxious. They are their own ads. Is outside ads the new development or what? New tiers?

[–] just_change_it@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Remember folks who are currently subscribed: They do not give prorated refunds for full year subs. ~~When you cancel the service ends immediately. Setup calendar reminders or eat the sunk cost now because~~ Amazon Prime is just a typical subscription entrapment scheme that will only get harder and harder to cancel, like a gym membership.

Edit: Thanks /u/@firadin - Cancel now, you don't lose anything and the membership simply won't renew on your renewal date.

[–] Texas_Hangover@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is that new? When I cancelled last year a couple months into my year long subscription I got the money back for the unused months. No problem, easy too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Beryl@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The enshitification will continue until there isn't any cent left to transfer to the shareholders.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rent seeking. It's called rent seeking. People keep calling it "enshitification" as if this is a new thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tischkante@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This isn't even really normal entshitification, they added videos and some music cheap Spotify knockoff to their fast delivery flat rate. Nobody asked them to.

Then they slowly raised the price, essentially locking everyone that just wanted free fast delivery into a video streaming service and kept increasing the price.

They did this to force existing subscribers into their "new" business idea of a video streaming service, when they couldn't yet compete with the competition back then. Good news for them, their competitors are shit now.

Now they can include advertisements in it too and add more expensive advertisement free tiers. Essentially increasing the price again, but hiding it so people can't ask for subscription fees back in Europe.

Do they really think most people have forgotten they just wanted a fast delivery flat rate? They will never offer their delivery flat rate without video and all that stuff again, only if a legislature would force them.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

And increasingly I'm finding that they're making me place a minimum order size to get the free shipping. You know - like shipping was without prime.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just in time for me to finish Invincible and fuck off

They aren't doing it because they have to, they're doing it to make money.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol that’s a nope from me, dawg. I’ll bail on that once I start seeing ads on a thing I pay for.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] roi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 year ago

It already fucking has one!! And I have prime!! what the fuck

[–] Nommer@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago

I just cancelled. Was thinking about doing it during the last price hike but never got around to it. Good thing they announced it now since it was going to renewed on the 15th of October.

[–] aeternum@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

yar har fiddle dee dee

[–] uzay@infosec.pub 18 points 1 year ago

"We aim to provide a meaningfully worse experience than the sailors of the seven seas are getting," Amazon insisted.

[–] UnknownQuantity@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Time to ditch Prime.

TBH, it was a long ago, but this is the last straw.

[–] just_change_it@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Amazon Prime hasn't been good for years. There's no reason to pay for it.

If amazon was smart they would have not included their streaming service in their free shipping subscription but now it just feels like an expensive bloated product with minimal value.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arcadefx1@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At the bottom of article…

Users will have the option to buy an ad-free subscription for an additional $2.99 per month, while the current prices will give them the version with ads.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Translation: Amazon is raising the price of Prime by $3/month. For comparison, Prime Video is currently $9/month.

[–] kaitco@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So glad I cancelled Prime a few months ago. Turns out, I’m still getting free shipping even without it and I didn’t find Rings of Power worth pirating.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yuunikki@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile, me, pirating like a chad

[–] Danc4498@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

Wow, that’s actually really shitty. They should have just raised the prices by $24, and announced a cheaper version of prime with ads. Nobody would have questioned it.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

🏴‍☠️

[–] Lexam@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

So ads, charging for shipping on many products, and costing $140 a year? Hmm.

[–] ViewSonik@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Alternate Headline: “Amazon ruins Prime and forces their customers to cancel their Prime Memberships by putting advertisements into paid content

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Oh awesome, great for users. I hope they increase the price of prime again with it!

load more comments
view more: next ›