I'm fascinated by this idea that the fediverse is open source by definition, when I don't think that's implied anywhere. It's notpart of the ActivityPub license, is it? I would have assumed thatw as public domain.
this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
63 points (90.9% liked)
Fediverse
28897 readers
1328 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Vidzy and the loops server code are available under AGPL. The loops app isn't open source yet, but has to be eventually as part of the NLnet grant agreement.
Loops is new and still in beta. The dev has said that he wants to wait to open source it until he feels it's current state is ready to be on other people's servers (once it reaches 1.0). I can't say I agree with the thought process but at least with pixelfed he did the same process and actually followed through on federation and open sourcing
The grant he's receiving to develop it requires it to be open source.
Nobody pays for that much bandwidth without the ability to manipulate you through profiling and impressions. You are the product. The product is not sharing videos. There is no fediverse platform that makes you its whore. If you were to make a video sharing platform, it would never work, because that is not the product, it's only a feature of what makes up the dopamine machine.
Lemmy will also never outgrow commercial platforms, because the commercial platforms also never were about content.
Nobody pays for that much bandwidth without the ability to manipulate you through profiling and impressions. You are the product. The product is not sharing videos. There is no fediverse platform that makes you its whore. If you were to make a video sharing platform, it would never work, because that is not the product, it's only a feature of what makes up the dopamine machine.
I mean, video streaming platforms already exist as part of the fediverse (Peertube) so i would disagree on you with you on that one.
Most of the content on TikTok is created by people because they want to earn money with it. But most of it isn't content which would make it possible to build up a supporter base through Patreon, OnlyFans etc. So where is the money going to come from to attract such content creators to a potential Fediverse TikTok alternative?
I mean independent sponsorships still exist, and for most creators, that's the biggest source of income anyway.
On TikTok? I doubt that. Do you have any examples?
[TikTok is] the most popular Social Media Platform
I'm not calling you a liar, but this is news to me. Do you have any data to back up that assertion?
I've gone of the google play charts.
Correct. Seems more like 5th.
YouTube is a social network?
No. But it is a social media site, and people have been conflating the two for twenty years now.
I'm often surprised by how active and "engaged" the comment section can get, especially on live videos.
I am often surprised how toxic yt comments are.
Perhaps I spend too much time reading them, but I'm more surprised when the comment section is NOT toxic!
I'd say third. YouTube isn't really a social media platform, nor WeChat.
If tiktok is sa social media platform, then so is youtube/
Thank you.
It could vary by age group, so not most popular overall, but it's relative.
It's not true. Not even close.
It's still in the early days of development and you will probably have to wait a bit for full AP implementation.
because the team building it are better at marketing what they want it to do rather than what it actually does.
doesnt federate. doesnt embed. requires their app or view only in their walled garden. so far its just yet-another-short-form-video-site
That's exactly what I'm worried about.