this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
1047 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

60600 readers
5352 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 367 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Brazil has been on it lately. At least with sticking it to tech bros

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 254 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah, they found out they could win, when they stuck it to X and straight up banned them until they complied.

Just like the big tech companies have different ToS for EU consumers.

Mad respect to them, but it should be normal. But it's not.

[–] lolrightythen@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also like California passing public health laws and companies deciding it is easier to comply to the entire U.S. instead of duplicating product lines.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (11 children)

All the BRICS have. Brazil just stands out, because its not a country we've flagged as "Evil Enemy Run By Inhuman Savages".

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 93 points 1 week ago (38 children)

It also helps that unlike the R and the C in BRICS, they aren't imperialists threatening and/or invading their neighbours. Brazil is a good world citizen.

load more comments (38 replies)
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not all, India is in BRICS and they are part of the problem in the tech world.

[–] Pyro@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

It's so disappointing. India has a massive tech service industry and could've been a force for good, but the government loves their censorship and authoritarianism too much.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

The limited view I have into the CEO culture there seems even more toxic than America's.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not on my 2025 bingo card I'll admit, but I'm here for it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 189 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Giving 72h to reply on a Friday is a nice touch ;⁠-⁠)

[–] veroxii@aussie.zone 23 points 1 week ago

"there is none". Explained in 10 seconds. Happy weekend!

[–] oce@jlai.lu 174 points 1 week ago (11 children)
[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Double entendre: “eu” means “me” in Portuguese

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 144 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did not expect Brazil to be the hero we need right now, but I’m here for it.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 66 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Brazil has at least some history of fighting against tech giant's disrespect of regularions https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_of_Twitter_in_Brazil

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] blueamigafan@lemmy.world 136 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Never in my wildest dreams did I imagine Brazil apparently propping up the internet, but huge swathes of twitter shutdown when Brazil banned it a while back, for a short time.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Loce@lemmy.world 95 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Brasil, please ban facebook. First twitter then facebook. Fuck the gready corporate assholes. Someone needs to make a first step and create a precedent, we need this. Social media will be (already is) the downfall of our civilization.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] clot27@lemm.ee 71 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Common Brazil W

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 69 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Makes sense for any country tondo this because as has become clear, it doesn't matter if you're a democracy or a dictatorship, if you are liking musk and face or not, X and meta can and will destabilize your country and once it happens, there is nothing you can do about it except banning the entire site, which will be an unpopular choice.

Musk especially has shown to be all about himself and he'll just push whatever political right wing party to destabilize a country.

Fuck x, fuck Facebook

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 68 points 1 week ago (11 children)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml 67 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Meta's anti-LGBT rules are closely knit to their ending the fact-checking: It is science denialism and linked to racism and vaccine skepticism.

Homosexuality and gender identity are not considered mental illnesses, Sex is not a binary, and Race is not connected to intelligence.

Bigots never liked science on these three, and now they use political power to impose their narrative.

Meta never moderated such discourse. Nor reddit nor twitter nor youtube. There was no censorship to end here. What this is, it is a free pass to punch down trans and gay people. It is incitement to violence, and Zuckerberg and Musk must go to the gallows for it.

Don't get me started on the toxic harassment these platforms have allowed against African and Carribean reparation activists, how they have destroyed the lives of feminists, and how they have named all Palestinians terrorists.

At this point race realists and gender essentialists have ensured political and technological control of the narrative.

There is no room for debating sealioning trolls on this one. If they don't understand the social dynamics against gender/sex/minorities at this moment, they are no better than brownshirts.

It is permabans and hooks and jabs all the way, for every single weird freak that backs this deranged hateful shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago

"We don't have to pretend anymore."

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 52 points 1 week ago (2 children)

According to the extrajudicial notice, this allows users to associate sexual identity to “a mental illness or abnormality” and allows “the defense of professional limitations based on gender.”

Why does anyone associate with this site. It's beyond me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Good. At least someone is saying something. More people and companies should voice their opinion.

[–] Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 1 week ago
[–] Codandchips@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Brazil gives Meta 72 hours to explain new fact-check policies>

Meta: we don't have any

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 31 points 1 week ago

"we hate gays"

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 week ago
[–] lemmyknow@lemmy.today 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] deus@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Enjoy it while it lasts. We like to immitate the US so in 2026 it's very likely that we'll elect a reactionary idiot again.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›