this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
51 points (93.2% liked)

Open Source

31908 readers
394 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There were some posts over the holiday season asking for projects to donate to, and for those who have the means to comfortably do so, this is an important gift to consider.

If there's only a limited amount each of us is able to give, I assume there's no point giving it all to, for one example, The Linux Foundation, because a small personal donation is trivial next to the ~$15,000,000 USD they receive from sponsors dependent on them[1]. I understand that funding sources can be a major and profound source of bias[2] and ideally we would be, for example, helping to make Firefox independent of Google, but until we have more collective power, it's not worth letting smaller important projects struggle instead.

So, which important projects should we leave to the sponsors, and which really need our support?

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pescetarian@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Matrix, Deltachat, Nextcloud more then enough, they can not more even with money

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 2 points 2 hours ago

Wikimedia, and wikipedia, also firefox

[–] squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

AntennaPod states this on their website

AntennaPod doesn’t need a lot of money. Our (annual) costs are already covered by our existing donation funds. Therefore, we’d much prefer it if you

  • donate to your favorite podcast(er), or
  • help us with a non-monetary contribution.
[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

Wikipedia could learn from their decency

[–] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 74 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

Jellyfin has explicitly asked that people find other places to donate to: https://opencollective.com/jellyfin/updates/were-good-seriously

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

Reading the first lines I was gonna say just cause their operating costs are covered doesn't mean they should refuse more donations, because they could use the money to hire people to fix their garbage software.

But they cleared that up further down where they suggest donating to Jellyfin clients instead, which are indeed the biggest problem at the moment.

Hopefully it will one day become a viable Plex alternative for people that are sharing their server with "normie" users, and not just users that are technologically inclined and willing to use external Android TV boxes instead of hoping their SmartTV has a Jellyfin client available for it that isn't hot garbage

[–] paradox2011@lemmy.ml 18 points 11 hours ago

I do see a mention in that post about instead supporting the jellyfin client developers. They give this page as a reference for who to support based on which client you use.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 16 points 12 hours ago

Thanks for sharing this.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 1 points 9 hours ago

same with antennapod

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 23 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe I can say Wikipedia because if it’s mediawiki software. Every year they ask for money but a lot of their funds don’t go towards the Wikipedia project.

[–] wargreymon@sh.itjust.works 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Their only defence is to support other mediawiki projects, but it is ambiguous we don't know how the money goes. The project, whatever that is, should speak for itself instead of going through Wikipedia.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Getting your ideas from Elon I see.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 2 points 5 hours ago

Did you even read what I said? Go look where their money goes, it’s mostly for random outreach programs.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Why do people ask questions like this? Isn't, "Which worthwhile FOSS projects are underfunded?" a better way to say it?

It's just so kludgy.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That's a different question.

[–] Apathy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

What makes it a different question, I’m ignorant and ask that you explain

[–] Daeraxa@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 minutes ago

Not OP but I would say because it is a smaller list where if you want to donate and make a big difference to the project then you know it is good to give money to pretty much anyone other than the over funded ones.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

firefox I guess actually has enough funding

leverage inc should, make it happen...

[–] ComradePedro@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago

Mozilla is losing the vast majority of its funding soon with the Google antitrust situation