this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
24 points (77.3% liked)

Movies

7610 readers
553 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 12 hours ago

I enjoyed it, but it certainly isn't too good for anything.

It's a fun romp, albeit somewhat typical. Screenplay is decent, but filled with a bit too much forced fan service. The world building is fantastic, though, and pretty much worth the price of admission itself.

The deepfake version of Ian Holm is pretty egregious. Given that they developed a puppet, and that the character was meant to be a broken android anyway (not a spoiler), I do wonder why they didn't just lean in to the weird face of a puppet. Why are his movements weird and mechanistic? Because it's a broken android. That may have aged better than the deepfake.

But overall, worth a watch, which is at least more than can be said for other series outings.

[–] keyez@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

It's been years since I've seen the Alien films so didn't remember enough to notice the callbacks. Watching it as a horror movie in the Alien universe it was very solid and had some really good set pieces.

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 10 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I liked it a LOT more than I expected to. It didn’t really scare me. Nothing does, though. But it was really fun and stayed fairly exciting throughout. I’m a SUPER harsh critic too. I give it 7.5/10.

[–] dditty@lemm.ee 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's definitely the best of the franchise since Alien and Aliens. I went into it with low expectations and it exceeded them. That they included fake CGI Ian Holm I thought was really bad though. And the movie was still very formulaic.

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I mean, if you’re going to use AI to create something, what better application is there for it than someone that is already an android/uncanny valley territory?

Definitely formulaic and contrived. But honestly, there aren’t that many new, unique stories to tell. Most plots are the same archetypes anyway.

[–] JizzmasterD@lemmy.ca 14 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

lol. Not the target audience for this one, but this film was not « too good » to be scary. It was ambitious and adventurous. At best, as the author says in his own summary «…Alien: Romulus is kind of good. »

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

if romulus was too good to be scary what does that make Alien or Aliens? such a weird take.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

Falls apart by the third act. The CGI android callback was unnecessary and eyeroll inducing. They could’ve simply introduced a third android model.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

100% accurate. They did Ian Holm so dirty. And they got too into fan pleasing Easter egg bits. I still enjoyed it, but it could have been much better. It started off really strong. The acid blood in zero G was an incredible addition to the franchise.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

they should have made it c3po and started the alien-predator-star wars multiverse.

[–] Uschteinheim@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The film was mediocre at best, a rehash of the previous episodes into one last recap. Kids is space. "There's sumtingdawotta....Aaaagh!". End of film. Boring and stupid.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 6 points 15 hours ago

That's exactly the problem with these reboots of finished franchises. I get that they just want to use the name for marketing, but at least make something new and interesting, instead they just become filled with tropes. We have seen the facehuggers, the xenomorphs, etc loads now, come up with something new and focus on that. Which then brings us to the point that it might as well be a new franchise altogether instead of rehashing old ones.

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

woof, i thought romulus was shit on a cracker

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I mean it was not exactly bad but just sorta a rehash, ugh but the lengths it went to setup the mcguffin.

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 1 points 15 hours ago

yeah, no, there was some cool looking scifi, but overall it was terrible, just one guys opinion

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.ca 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Wayland Utani?? Was this written or transcribed by AI?