this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
103 points (98.1% liked)

General Discussion

12139 readers
212 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


🪆 About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: !lemmy411@lemmy.ca!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


💬 Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to !fediverse@lemmy.world or !lemmydrama@lemmy.world communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The ole saying... Oh Ben Franklin how you have aged so well

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

Gig workers are getting so damn rich! Better cut our profit!

[–] Hotspur@lemmy.ml 75 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know they’ve said they don’t have the capacity to take on the really big tax cheats (ie the same people that pay lobbyists and gift politicians with trips and gifts), but recovering one or two of their dodged taxes alone would probably cover every gig worker who’s ever underpaid taxes.

Of course, that would only make sense if you thought the IRS’ primary function was to fairly enforce taxation and mutual support of our shared govt—whereas the older I get, the more it seems to me that it serves as a social disciplining function and a lever to adjust social mobility. If your have enough money, you never have to worry about them.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

This is why Biden gave them a big funding boost, to staff up so they could go after those people.

[–] Hotspur@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Well, maybe so, but so far they’re going after… gig workers

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

War machine go brrr we got Palestinian babies to kill. TurboTqx gotta get their cut too.

Why are normal people trying to scrape out a living being punished and not the companies that are exploiting labor laws? Require Uber, DoorFash, etc. To hire the workers as employees with a proper W-2

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Theres no punishment, if you’re paying your taxes. Think of this as requiring the same reporting from companies as they already do for w-2.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 day ago

The lobby is strong.

California literally had a ballot measure to force Uber, etc to hire as employees, and they spent so much money muddying the water that it failed.

[–] SoupBrick@yiffit.net 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Previously, gig platforms only had to report information to the IRS for workers who earned more than $20,000 and completed at least 200 transactions.  The new thresholds are designed to make it harder for gig workers to avoid paying taxes on their income.

“Like their fellow Americans who earn income through traditional means, U.S. taxpayers who earn income from digital and other platforms that comprise the gig economy need to pay their fair share of taxes,” IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel said in a statement. “The world is getting smaller for tax cheats, and we will work collaboratively with our partners to vigorously enforce the nation’s tax laws.”

[–] Makhno@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"We promise to squeeze the poor even harder"

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I guess the poor should have voted.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 20 hours ago

Political process is captured, this is point just shifting blame on the poors while ignoring how shot works in reality.

Yeah sure they should vote more but ain't shit gonna change from voting alone.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

as long as they collect the taxes from the corps directly this would be fine. drop the bill on grubhub.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They won’t. This is only the companies reporting to IRS. However as long as they get away with calling it contracting work, it’s up to the individual

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

honestly they need to do it like gas and have the companies pay 100% so most folks don't even need to fill out a tax form.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is contract work is based on the assumption they are contracting out to a separate company to do their work. That company is responsible for paying its employees and doing their taxes properly. It really doesn’t fit gig work, but companies like uber have a big cost advantage by pretending it does.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 4 hours ago

yeah honestly they should not allow non w2 contract. If someone wants to independently contract they should need to form an llc. This would cut down on the bs as gig work would have to do w2 as there is no way to make it simple for the workers to all become llc's.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It's been known by employers for a while. I worked for an event catering gig for a summer or two and talking to the bosses they were well aware that the IRS was going from one gig in the state to another. For instance the year before my boss's profession got hit, all of the places that hired golf caddies were audited all at once.