this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
540 points (96.9% liked)

World News

39386 readers
2945 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Israeli officials fear the pope's vocal criticisms and symbolic gestures - such as this year’s nativity scene in St Peter’s Square featuring baby Jesus resting on a Palestinian keffiyeh - may influence global public opinion.

Created by Bethlehem artists Johny Andonia and Faten Nastas Mitwasi, the nativity scene prominently features Palestinian materials, including olive wood, a symbol of Palestinian resilience.

During its unveiling, Pope Francis condemned the global arms industry for profiting from human suffering and reiterated his call for an end to all wars, urging the faithful to remember those suffering in the holy land.

The display, praised by many as a message of solidarity and peace, drew backlash from Israel’s supporters, who accused the Vatican of promoting a pro-Palestinian agenda.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

HOW CAN YOU CRITICIZE US KILLING CHILDREN????

[–] LSNLDN@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 hours ago

Because they’re antisemites ofc

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 33 points 10 hours ago

Israel's children killing business is cutting into the church child molesting business. It's a conflict of interest.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 22 points 11 hours ago

only an anti-semitist would say "don't kill children". they should get him fired for this.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 16 hours ago

Israel thinks this is what's going to give them a poor public opinion!?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 34 points 17 hours ago

Imagine getting upset over "Don't kill children"

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 23 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

This is probably a good time to mention that Israel, like all developed nations, has been experiencing a slowing birth rate.

This was a problem for them because the birthrate in the occupied territories was higher, and if you can’t maintain a Jewish majority in the country, how can you maintain the country as a Jewish homeland? This existential doom has hung over Israelis like climate change or the heat death of the universe: even if they aren’t destroyed in fire, they’ll simply dissolve over time until they disappear, and it will all be for nothing.

So you know. I’m not saying that killing Palestinian children was the solution they came up with. But the prospect of a justified way to wipe Gaza clean came their way, and it was too important an opportunity to pass up. If some children must be killed in the process, they think, silently, in the quietest corner of their hearts, then so be it.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 10 points 10 hours ago

This isn't some secret. Listen to John Mearsheimer, who has talked about this for years. it is simple logic.

There is about the same number of Arab Palestinians and Western Israelis in the area. So for the Jewish supremacy ethonstate that Israel wants to be there is only three options:

  1. Indefinite Apartheid. This is extremely costly and as the Arab population keeps growing more and more difficult to maintain. Also it is just preserving the status quo

  2. Ethnic cleansing. Drive all the Palestinians out. However then your neighbors have to harbor them, they form a resistance there, and they keep demanding their right to return.

  3. Genocide. By eradicating them all, you get the "final" solution to permanently steal and settle the land.

So what we see is Israel maintaining option 1 and looking to escalate to option 2 and 3 whenever possible. Notice how they first tried to expel the population of Gaza into Egypt? When this option wasn't possible and they knew that their western supporters in the US, UK, Germany and others were okay with genocide, they escalated to genocide.

The only way to get out of this situation with minimizing further destruction and murder is to abandon the Zionist project in favor of a just state that grants equal rights and justice to everyone living in Palestine.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

I have no proof of this, but I think Israeli intelligence knew the October Hamas attack was coming. Probably didn't realize how severe it was going to be, but they may have wanted it for an excuse for everything they did after.

I can't even wrap my head around what the goal of Hamas was with their attack. Surely they knew that Israel's response would be total insanity. Maybe they're drinking their own koolaid even at the top.

[–] Shard@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Lets not confuse intelligence that something major is going to happen with actionable intelligence where you can preemptively take action to prevent an attack.

Prior to 9-11 there was most definitely increased chatter and I'd hazard a guess that many security and intelligence agencies knew something was going down on US soils but didn't have actionable specifics that would have allowed them to take appropriate action and prevent 9-11.

I think it was a similar issue with Israel and they must have believed that the worse case was an isolated terrorist bombing and to prepare a typical lockdown and emergency services response and not a massive raid on their territories.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Yeah someone else provided some good links to the links here. I was making the same connection. Check the other reply.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, seems like a pretty good source. It reminds me of the "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Within the US" reports that surfaced after the 9/11 attacks. I don't actually believe that GWB was in on it, but I could see the administration letting something happen for reason to go to war.

It's so similar in a way. Perhaps both were intentionally allowed at some level, just underestimated in scale. I can't imagine either of the leaders, Bush or Netanyahu, to allow so many of their "own people" to die and make a mockery of their countries to the world. Perhaps they did. I doubt we'll ever know.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

I don't believe Bush did it through malice, it was 100% incompetence.

I mean, take it from Richard Clarke:

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/trust-clarke-hes-right-about-bush/

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Of course they knew, they have one of if not the best secret agency in the world.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml -1 points 7 hours ago

What, Israel counts as developed nation?

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

"If you lill them you have fun only once!"

The Pope.

[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 94 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Remember that part of Jesus's story where he had to flee because a mad king was systematically murdering children because he was scared that the child was "the king of kings".

What a wild parallel.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

If you believe in the divine Jesus, and have a decent understanding of history, surely you would know that the man would look more like the average Palestinian than the average Israeli.

When it comes to religion though logic must leave the building.

[–] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world 131 points 1 day ago (6 children)

This is NotTheOnion material. Like, are you actually mad that the fucking Pope is not on board with killing children?

[–] TotallyNotADolphin@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

Ofcourse the catholic church is not onboard with murdering children. How will the clergy get laid if all the children are killed?

But on a more serious note, the current pope is actually doing a decent job of calling out atrocities and promoting some of the decent aspects of their faith, and not propping up all of the bad stuff as god's will

load more comments (10 replies)

Crossposted 👍

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Elrecoal19@lemm.ee 91 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"Child murderers complain that their child murdering is being called out"

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 38 points 22 hours ago

The pope is Hamas!

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 points 9 hours ago

"no, this is Patrick"

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 35 points 21 hours ago

The vatican is finally right about something, even relevant, for once. Good for them. They have a lot to make up for, and this is a start.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago

If you’re on the pro-killing children side, it’s probably time to look in the mirror.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 66 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

“Yesterday, children were bombed. This is cruelty, not war,” the pontiff declared last Saturday, lamenting the immense humanitarian crisis in the besieged enclave.

Israel lashed out in response, accusing the pope of ignoring its security concerns.

Israeli foreign ministry spokesperson Oren Marmorstein accused the pope of ignoring the broader context of Israel’s military actions, which have resulted in the killing of 17,000 children.

Maybe everyone should ignore a "security concern" if the only way to alleviate that concern is murdering 17,000 children?

Because whatever group you're concerned about, probably won't like you anymore after you murder 17,000 of their children....

Especially when the reason for your concern is people are mad you keep killing them in the first place.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 17 points 22 hours ago

To be precise, not all 17k Palestinian children had the luxury of immediate death from being blown up with American bombs by Israeli terrorists. Many of them were in fact killed by sniper fire, with an alarmingly large percentage of the murdered children dying from headshot or chest shot sniper wounds. These are kids as young as 5 and 6 being headshot from miles away by Israeli snipers. This has been corroborated many times over by American doctors who were working in the Gaza hospitals, before all of those hospitals got blown up too.

There is no possible security concern which could justify such acts of terrorism. Israel’s motivation is clearly a land grab, and Netanyahu’s is clearly to remain in power throughout the slaughter. They are absolute monsters.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So, if not murdering children is pro-Palestinian, then I guess I'm pro-Palestinian.

And logically, that means being pro-Israeli (or at least pro-Israeli government, because I know there are lots of Israelis who are not happy about what their government is doing) is also pro-child-murder. Their logic, not mine!

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 10 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Unironically, this is how Israelis think. Those are the bad kids who would grow up to hurt them.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 hours ago

And the logic of fascists is "we can wipe them all out, so then the threat will be gone", ignoring the practical impossibility of actually killing so many millions of people completely, as well as the fact that the entire world can see what they're doing, and have connections to the victims, so they are making way more enemies than they started with.

It's a delusion of superiority, that they are so powerful and their foes so weak that they can overwhelm them.

[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Absolutely if you go on killing their parents, their brithers and sisters; bomb their playgrounds, their schools. What else they are going to do except for lashing out anyone. These would be the kids vulnerable to be brainwashed into doing further horriffic things.

[–] Jamablaya@lemmy.today 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Why do Israelis (well most of them) care what an old Catholic has to say?

[–] A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The logic chain of the Netanyahu camp is: Keep Netanyahu out of jail -by-> Keeping him in power -by-> Creating a problem and showing he is solving it -by-> Stirring up regional instability and dragging the US into it -by-> Being belligerent and genociding as hard as possible.

Now for this to work, they need to maintain conflict while maintaining the support from the US. About 70% of the US identify as some form of Christian... and some significant percentage of them support Israel in their genocide because they believe it will bring the second coming of Jesus. But if the about 20% of Americans who identify as Catholic actually flip to being anti-genocide because their leader advocates for that, that is under threat - it potentially becomes close to a majority who are anti-genocide, and makes ongoing support from the US less likely.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

I'm with you up until you start talking specifically about catholics. I don't have stats on hand but I believe the venn diagram of "people who believe in forcing Jesus to come back with some bullshit in the holy land" and "catholics" has very little overlap.

Here in the bible belt I've known and met many flavors of protestant who don't even think of catholics as christians.

[–] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago

There's nothing that says victims can't become aggressors. This is true for individuals as well as large groups of people, including nation-states. A child who was abused can become an abusive parent. A religious group that was persecuted for years can become an oppressor. Jews were victims of a genocide a few years ago, and were persecuted for years and years before in Europe, but Israel is not a victim anymore and the rest of the world should tell it to stop acting like one because they are the one commiting genocide.

load more comments
view more: next ›