this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
1087 points (93.4% liked)

You Should Know

33453 readers
754 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He generally shows most of the signs of the misinformation accounts:

  • Wants to repeatedly tell basically the same narrative and nothing else
  • Narrative is fundamentally false
  • Not interested in any kind of conversation or in learning that what he’s posting is backwards from the values he claims to profess

I also suspect that it’s not a coincidence that this is happening just as the Elon Musks of the world are ramping up attacks on Wikipedia, specially because it is a force for truth in the world that’s less corruptible than a lot of the others, and tends to fight back legally if someone tries to interfere with the free speech or safety of its editors.

Anyway, YSK. I reported him as misinformation, but who knows if that will lead to any result.

Edit: Number of people real salty that I’m talking about this: Lots

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] regdog@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

And his name is Elon Musk

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago (18 children)

Who hates Wikipedia:

  • Tech bros
  • Russia
  • Israel
  • Other generic fascists
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Shelbyeileen@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

I do the research and script writing for a documentary company. In 2023, I noticed that the pages of serial killers I'd been researching, started mentioning political affiliation in the top paragraph... but they all said Democrat (or socialst, communist sympathizer, anti-fascist, etc). Then, one of the murderers I was researching, who was literally a Republican politician who killed his wife , said Democrat and I had a team investigate. It got corrected, but we have no idea if it was one person or a group that changed the pages. Someone out there wants murderers to be associated with democrats.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  1. I don't trust Wikipedia, but I do think they're a good STARTING POINT for research, the problem comes when it's used as the end-all be-all

  2. Can you be specific about this misinformation so I don't just point fingers at anyone who doesn't worship the ground Wikipedia walks on. Like what are they saying and why isn't it true?

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Quoting myself from elsewhere:

This is how modern social media propaganda works. One person says wikipedia is kowtowing to fascist governments and doxxing its members. That turns out to be bullshit, but during the discussion someone else says that $300 million “excess” went missing and no one knows where it went, implying that someone is skimming off money and we shouldn’t be donating because the whole thing is corrupt. That turns out to be bullshit, but during the discussion someone else says that wikipedia is slanting all its coverage to a pro-Western, pro-Israel slant and covering up the truth through a narrative enforcing task force. That turns out to be bullshit, but during the discussion, someone else combs through their financials and finds out that the CEO is making some money, and uses phrases like “bleeding the foundation dry” or “all while content is created by volunteers.”

You can look through my profile to see the exchanges where people say all of those things and then I respond, if you want to see in depth where and how people are saying it, and my arguments for why it isn’t true.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] M600@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure it's Elon.

[–] Breve@pawb.social 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are a shocking number of Elmo simps.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago
[–] Aslanta@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The entire 485 word intro to his Wikipedia page is unsourced:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elon_Musk

[–] ripripripriprip@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

There's a Forbes source on his wealth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 2 days ago (8 children)

DOWNLOAD A COPY OF WIKIPEDIA NOW. RIGHT NOW. DO NOT WAIT.

WIKIPEDIA WILL BE RUINED IN (just guessing) THREE MONTHS (I hope I’m wrong)

[–] Firipu@startrek.website 31 points 1 day ago

Or even better, donate to wikipedia. I know I just did.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do download a copy of Wikipedia but give them some credit. This isn’t the first nor last attack on information freedom (see internet archive)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xor@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

lol, no it won’t….

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As long as people keep in mind what Wikipedia is, there should be no issue. There's a reason teachers never allow it as a source, but it is great as an introduction to any topic, from which point you can further your own research.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jamablaya@lemmy.today 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People posting misinformation? On Lemmy? No. It can't be.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

People posting misinformation? On ~~Lemmy~~ the Internet? No. It can't be.

👍👍

load more comments
view more: next ›