this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
700 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19223 readers
3039 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Right when he's completely useless, he pushes for this. Pathetic and disingenuous.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

I can hear Michael Cole from WWE:

Vintage Biden

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 42 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Useless gesture that will never ever get passed. Thanks Joe.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 78 points 18 hours ago (8 children)

You're days away from the end of your entire run and now we grow morals.

This is like those old racist folks on their death beds trying to make amends to anyone and everyone in their final days.

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

You just never looked into what they're really doing, and for some reason media isn't keen on reporting all the good proposals and legislations they were doing, I wonder why.
This administration was the best one in centuries, both in terms of legislation and in terms of administrative work. The only question they aren't good on is Palestine, and incidentally it's the only thing that media suddenly cares about, I wonder why(2).

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I largely agree but let’s not forget Afghanistan. Trump contributed but the Biden admin was elected to be the adults in the room and they looked totally disorganized and incompetent during that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 points 12 hours ago

Because the media is owned by Republicans

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago (15 children)

The only thing they didn't do good on was that one small genocide they enabled, hah oops lmao

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] 3x7x37@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

The only question they aren’t good on is Palestine

Yes, other than that they were perfect. For example, they never would have continued Trumps racist border policy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 15 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Oh come on, don't give these sandbagging stooges more credit than they deserve. The only reason what you're saying doesn't sound quite as batshit insane as it should is that we haven't had a government that prioritizes the working class even close to as much as the rich since WWII. Biden isn't terrible compared to his peers but his peers have all been sucking the same corporate dick for so long that no one young enough to know what Lemmy is have ever experienced anything else. Calling that greatness is not being objective it's just a lack of imagination.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 126 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Little fucking late, Joey.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 2 points 8 hours ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] generalpotato@lemmy.world 48 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, NOW he wants. The last 4 years wasn’t time enough to get this done.

Fuck off.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 35 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Or any time in like the 40 years he was in congress….

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cristo@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

I'd be fine with congressional stock trading if congress members were required to immediately report trades instead of the 45 days or so they are currently legally required to

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 3 points 7 hours ago

Nah, they already got their money by then. Their trades go through first then everyone else's? And prereporting trades is ripe for stock manipulation. They should not be able to personally manage a portfolio and imho insider trading should carry hefty corruption penalties for congress.

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

If they wish to invest, it should be in a fund that is managed for them by people without insider knowledge.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I'd only be okay with it if those trades were reported and published publicly within the hour of the trade.

Let everyone benefit from inside trader or do the right thing and make everyone subject to the law.

[–] cristo@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I thought that was currently the case they just had a 45 day max reporting timeline, unless my Nancy pelosi clone portfolio has been lying to me. Apparently her average reporting time is 14 days

[–] TriPolarBearz@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Just curious... How is your Pelosi clone portfolio going? Is it a legitimate investment strategy compared to the usual suggestion of index funds?

[–] cristo@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

So far over the past year I've had it active, I'm up 40%. It seems to be working well, I have it automated through a service called Autopilot and it has already paid for itself. I wish I put more into it at the start but so far I've got no complaints.

[–] Vanix@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

There's two ETFs now for tracking democrat trades and republican trades if you have any interest in tracking this kind of portfolios performance! I don't think there's an ETF for Nancy specifically but she's definitely a part of the dem ETF

[–] TriPolarBearz@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Cool, I tried looking it up.

Seems like the tickers are NANC (D) and KRUZ (R)

Are those the ones you are taking about? If so, I love the tickers.

[–] cristo@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

That would be so funny if the ETF for the Dems was called Nancy

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I feel like if you want to hold government office you should 1. Give up all your wealth. 2. In exchange for this, you get a rock solid $500,000 salary. This isn’t because you are an elite, this is because paying you well makes it harder to bribe you. 3. When you lose your seat or step down, you can never work again in your life. This is to prevent you from ever taking on a lobbying job or otherwise using your power to enrich yourself and influence government for special interests. In exchange for this, you can take 80% of your salary that you had while in office until you die.

These changes hopefully would give office holders enough personal financial security to focus on making decisions without being influenced by external money.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 21 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

We don't need to bribe them to do their jobs. We need to make them afraid of what will happen to them if they don't.

[–] Chip_Rat@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

It's both. Otherwise noone would be dumb enough to do such a high profile, high stress, and apparently low paying job. I do want the smartest, hardest working and best people leading my country, not some random guy would couldn't get a better job.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 18 points 17 hours ago

Four years too fucking late, asshole

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 82 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Biden had previously declined to take a position on congressional stock trading. When Jen Psaki served as White House press secretary two years ago, she said Biden would “let members of leadership in Congress and members of Congress determine what the rules should be.”

Back when it was up for debate and the party had the numbers....

I fucking hate how moderates waste the time for action, ignore everyone spending years demanding action...

Then turn around like that fucking pulp fiction meme asking why no one has thought to do the thing we've spent years telling them to do once there's no time.

At best they're completely incompetent, at worst they're not as dumb as a box of rocks and are just incredibly incompetent. Whatever the reason, we can do better. We have to do better.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 hours ago

we have to do better

I agree, but we won't.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 4 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

moderates

Don't paint people who are against polarization with the same brush as incumbent old cash grabbing power hogs.

This is a class struggle and poor people on either side of the political isle get played against each other like a fucking Stradivarius. Poor and middle class (what's left of it) should unite, rather than fight each other.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 23 points 18 hours ago

At worst it’s deliberate decision to go for it when they know they cannot win and don’t have time to fight for it.

This way they don’t have to ever enact these changes but they get voters to think they’re a progressive party who are pushing for them.

[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago

Fuck Joe Biden.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 20 points 19 hours ago

Next up, he'll try to introduce a bill that states free healthcare for all, paid through the taxes. Everyone wants it, but nothing will come of it, because America will be a fascist country in about a month. Good luck, America!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›