this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
8 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

49188 readers
422 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] burgersc12@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Plastic. Its in your blood ffs

[โ€“] keenanpepper@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This may be true but I hate the practice of referring to "plastic" as if it's a single substance. It's a bunch of different materials that don't really have that much in common with each other, especially from a health/toxicity standpoint.

For example, people treat it as common sense that "you shouldn't burn plastic" because the smoke is "toxic". For PVC this is totally true, it makes very nasty stuff like dioxin that will poison you. But on the other hand you can burn polyethylene (think milk jug) and it's no more toxic than burning a candle. Definitely way healthier to breath than wood campfire smoke, for example.

There's also such a silly pattern where people learn some chemical might have some effect on the body and suddenly everyone is up in arms about it. For example Bisphenol A in many applications was replaced by the very similar Bisphenol S just so things could be labeled "BPA Free". BPS probably has similar estrogenic effects to BPA.

I'd say the moral of the story is be wary of received wisdom about chemical toxicity from people who aren't chemists.

[โ€“] erogenouswarzone@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago

Not only BPAs but many chemicals like BPAs can cause birth defects because our bodies think they are estrogen.

If this worries you, read the books It Starts With the Egg and Grain Brain.

They both suggest that not only what you eat, but how it's prepared can affect the health of a child.

For instance it's a big no-no, according to It Starts With the Egg, to heat most plastics in the microwave. The heat breaks the plastic down, it can get in your blood, your body will think it's estrogen, and they don't even know the full effects of this yet.

So think about

  • burritos in plastic wrapping,
  • cling wrap on a bowl,
  • reheating leftovers in Tupperware,
  • disposable cutlery

These chemicals are not just in food:

  • your car's interior
  • your cell phone case
  • even the clothes on your back, unless they're 100% pure, untreated, natural fabric, may have been made with these chemicals.
[โ€“] HamSwagwich@showeq.com 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Sugar. People don't realize how bad it is for you and how addictive it is.

[โ€“] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Sugar is not bad. Abuse of sugar is bad. Sugar is absolutely fine, as long as one doesn't exceed. Problem is that in American-inspired diets sugar is everywhere at gigantic doses

[โ€“] speaker_hat@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

Do basic groceries abuse sugar? And I'm not talking about the "organic" ones

[โ€“] knobbysideup@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd go with high fructose corn syrup

[โ€“] UhBell@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Fructose is typically fine when it's paired with equal amounts of glucose, like in fruit. Your body has a really hard time processing high concentrations of fructose alone, which is how most sugary food is produced now a days since high fructose is a much cheaper method of sweetening food than a balanced mix of sugars.

[โ€“] lynny@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Social media. It wasn't until very recently that people started to realize just how harmful it actually is.

[โ€“] Mert@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Microplastics and PFAS

No, seriously, these two will kill Earth, and us

[โ€“] Cheers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Marketing. We put a person on the moon because we were scared of the space race, and then we spent the next 50 years figuring out how to make rich people richer by manipulating human behavior and gamifying everything so you buy into the buy more stuff you don't need and click more stuff you don't care about. We've gotten so good at it, we only need a 10 second short to advertise stuff to you.

This affects everything we do down to its core and will likely be the cause of astronomical ADHD rates in the future.

[โ€“] jannis@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

PFAS, which are needed to produce teflon and other nonstick materials. It currently begins to attack attention, but wasn't really an issue a few years ago. It doesn't decay naturally so it will be forever in the environment. The EU is even planning to ban all PFAS.

[โ€“] Treczoks@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Social Media

[โ€“] czer0_@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Social Media

[โ€“] sma3in@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago
[โ€“] Cybersteel@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Microplastics

[โ€“] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Microplastics and plastic related byproducts, like phtalates (which are connected with a decreased fertility in mammals)
I'm positive that the long term effects of these substances, that can be found in every link of the food chain nowadays, will be discussed a lot in the future

[โ€“] mlepnos@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago
[โ€“] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Probably brake pads. Everyone's living in cities now, just breathing in brake pad and lead particles.

Oh and car tires. Just huffing those all day.

[โ€“] fubo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Perfluoroalkyls aka PFAS appear to screw with all manner of body functions.

Since you mention tobacco: It's worth noting that the smoking/cancer connection was noticed long before peak cigarette smoking in the population. Prior to WWII, lung cancer was considered a rare disease. That changed with the mass marketing of cigarettes.

[โ€“] WagnasT@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 2 years ago

There's a couple studies showing that even though your body can't process and remove PFAS and it just keeps accumulating, if you donate blood regularly you reduce the amount in your body by a bit each time. There are other slight health benefits to donating blood and lots of places will pay you for it. So if you can reduce your PFAS intake and donate blood you can slowly get rid of it. I use arch linux btw.

[โ€“] Ghostc1212@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Microplastics are the new lead, and screens are the new tobacco, in my opinion. Overuse of sugar in processed foods is the new version of how they'd cut food with inedible stuff like sawdust back in the day.

[โ€“] ComradeR@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My mom become an avid anti-plastic person after watching videos and reading things about the damages that microplastics do to the health, nature and the planet. She does everything she can to avoid using plastic things!

[โ€“] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago

Care to elaborate? Always looking for new tips to cut back on my personal plastic use.

[โ€“] octet33@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

Fossil fuels.

Things have slowly drifted from "we might wanna consider doing something before this becomes a problem" to "we need an immediate and concrete plan" to "anything short of immediate and drastic action is killing and will continue to kill people" over the course of the last decade or two.