this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
103 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19241 readers
1838 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The think tank behind Project 2025, the conservative blueprint linked to President-elect Donald Trump, is launching an effort to back Trump’s imperiled selection for secretary of defense in its latest attempt to wield influence in the incoming Republican administration.

Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts said Thursday that his group will spend $1 million to pressure senators unwilling to back Pete Hegseth, whose nomination to lead the Pentagon has come into question due to his views on women serving in combat and reports about his personal behavior. A number of Republican senators have declined to commit to backing Hegseth or have asked for more information about his drinking and treatment of women.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 weeks ago

Well… THAT is quite the endorsement for Kevin Roberts.

It definitely helps frame Project 2025 and the Heritage Foundation that they’re willing to throw away traditional family values in the pursuit of autocracy.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

I love that some "architect" of a doc, thanks to a difference of 1.6% in voting, gets to ignore millions and millions of Americans in carrying out their plans written up in this doc.

Also, I love that our pathetic "liberal media" bothsidered this all along, acting like Project 2025 was a GD conspiracy theory or something, when it was a published document and had "JD" "Vance" writing the forward to it....I despise the smug little "objective" outlets nearly as much as the magabrained assholes that are working so hard to destroy this country - these Enlightened Centrists are paving the way.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is he saying he'll split a mil between the senators currently unwilling to back the guy?

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 6 points 2 weeks ago

Sounds like it.

[–] WeUnite@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

It seems he killed a dog with a shovel: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/sep/24/project-2025-kevin-roberts-killed-dog

And now he wants to appoint an incompetent drunk to lead our military.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I will be completely rabid by the end of this administration. Dude is just straight up saying he'll buy approval.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Alcohol got me through the last administration. Cheers to round 2 I guess.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Use that anger, dont drown it out. We need our lion's more than ever. We're experiencing first hand that the only thing that gets our overlords to listen is what no ToS can bare.

[–] actually@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

They really need a SD who will not say no