this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
1170 points (99.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26934 readers
3976 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago

I ban trolleys. Everyone walks.

[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

This is only superficially a prisoner's dilemma. In a true one, you cannot get a better result for yourself no matter what the other person does, but here if you assume the other person pulled the lever, there is no reason to pull the lever yourself.

To fix this, you can have 4 relatives on the trolley, and 5 of the opposite faction way back on the middle track. Both do nothing, 1 relative of each is killed. One guy switches the lever, their relatives are all fine, other guy loses 5. Both switch, crash with all 8 relatives on the trolley dead.

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I see what you're trying to do and you're not necessarily wrong, but you're kinda perpetuating the attitude that inspired someone to make this meme in the first place

[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 3 points 43 minutes ago

I'm not sure I follow. Should this meme's creator not have been inspired?

[–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

How much did I like that one guy really.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Are the 5 people on the opposong trolley worthy of death? Will killing them outweigh losing my loved ones?

Or is the one loved one ill save my really hot 1st cousin?

Because with the rest of the family dead, we can live happily ever after without any annoying incest complaints.

[–] BluesF@lemmy.world 2 points 52 minutes ago

ಠ⁠_⁠ಠ

[–] Peck@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Well obviously you should pull the lever once the front wheels past the split but before the rear wheels cross it, so that trolley gets off the rails. This way everybody has the chance to survive and you have defensible position during inevitable court hearing.

Tit. For. Tat.

[–] xta@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

pull my gun, kill the other person and move the lever, as far i can know that person is the one that set me and my family up

[–] somewhathinged@lemm.ee 13 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

If you think about this for any length of time and actually imagine this scenario, you realise you don't pull the lever and it's not even close.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Wrong. You pick the obviously wrong moral stance and then aggressively yell about it on the internet. The more obvious it becomes that you are wrong, the louder you yell. This protects your ego from introspection.

SHUT UP. THE RIGHT CHOICE IS TO DROP A NUKE ON EVERYONE.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

that right, I'd masturbate on the tracks and on the people tied to the tracks so they are slipery and can slide or bounce to safety. And before you judge me, its the only thing I'm really good at and we should make the most of what we have in life.

Failing that for whatever reason (or maybe in addition to that), I'd asses which of the prospects are lefties and make sure those people in particular live. Sorry centrists and republicans, but we need the votes and some people have to die, but I'm focussed on doing the least harm here.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You realize this is your family watching you make the decision to have their vehicle run over a loved one? There's a possibility they all live if you pull it.

[–] Famko@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Or if you pull it, then they see you make the decision to risk their lives to kill three other people.

What is better, three lives lost or one life lost?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

ok but what if the 3 in the middle were avg US swing state voters.

[–] Famko@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

The other side would deal with them then.

But then your loved one (mom, dad, sister,child) dies.

[–] DrDeadCrash@programming.dev 4 points 3 hours ago

Yell "Jump!"

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 14 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Have these folks seen The Good Place? Or are they just approaching the same conclusion by accident?

[–] solstice@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

By far the smartest show ever written and it's not even close!

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

You need to watch more shows. Don't get me wrong, I like The Good Place and what they were trying to do with it, but yeah no there's a lot of other shows that are just as educational and well written that don't have to do a show-wide reset to start every season

[–] bananabenana@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Lmao what. Sure it covers philosophy 101, but not as smart as say, Dark, Mr Robot, Better Call Saul, Watchmen etc.

[–] SuspiciousCatThing@pawb.social 2 points 50 minutes ago

Those shows are a good way to dip your toes into the subject before you start Rick and Morty.

[–] Crankenstein@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Idk .. Andor has a really good message.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

you find some third way thats not the bad outcomes that are suggested. Theres always possibilities in life and people who say there are not are generally trying to coerce you.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 hours ago

The meaning behind the trolly problem has been entirely eroded at this point.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

mercifully pulling both levers.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

But then how do you kill the remaining two people?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

Survivor's guilt

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

I think these scenarios might be easier to analyze if we made them a bit more realistic.

This an analogy for military intervention. If we empower our military to be proactive, we can save one "good guy"^TM^ by killing 3 bystanders. But if NATO's adversaries are participating too we lose 3 of our "good guy"^TM^

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I think the abstract nature is one of the strengths. If you ask someone a question about military intervention, their pre-existing views towards military intervention will heavily bias their answer.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah that's a good point. Maybe I should amend my statement to say something like:

If this seems like an absurd hypothetical, consider reframing it. Multiply all the numbers by a factor of between 1,000 to 1,000,000 and make them "our soldiers", "bystanders" and "enemy soldiers" respectively.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›