this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
114 points (100.0% liked)

HistoryPorn

4870 readers
289 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  9. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MuhammadJesusGaySex@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Man, that ship sitting so low in the water gives me anxiety. I understand the reason behind it, but it doesn’t not make it and underwater tomb waiting to happen.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Some of the early reporters who got to take a ride along on low-draft Monitors like that wrote that it felt surreal to see water dip over the deck and not sink the ship.

Of course, that's also why they couldn't be used outside of rivers and calm coastal waters.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What is the reason? That seems so bad

[–] zagaberoo@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

Much lower cross-section for enemies to hit.

[–] MuhammadJesusGaySex@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So there is more wooden ship under the water. That’s where the engine and coal and stuff is. So, you have a wooden ship made using civil war technology,, with people inside under the water. With iron plates fixed to the exposed part of the hull.

I’m sure it was safe enough, but just the idea seems less than ideal.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

"safe enough" is relative. they weren't properly sea-going vessels; they could only handle relatively calm coastal waters. bad weather or just open water would prove problematic. that said, it being lower gave it better protection from threats. They were used to defend harbors, though, so it wasn't necessary for them to be sea worthy.

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

once you are in range of its 15 inch guns, all you can see is a pair of small, fortified towers flashing at you.. it would have been mostly a deterrent, just like any fortification..

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

damn that thing had a 15in. smoothbore gun and an 8in. gun on each turret.. eventually was sold to France where it was put in service on coastal defense, but was never called into action there.. basically a floating gun emplacement, not really a naval warship..

[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How did they sail it to France? Surely that thing isn't seaworthy

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] theodewere@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

honestly would love to see a short documentary on just that voyage

[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And it ... didn't capsize? Lmao

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

must have been an adventure

[–] athos77@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

That is sailing so much lower than I ever thought it would be! I'm surprised the Monitor was only damaged, not sunk in the battle. (And it's also much more understandable how it sunk in a storm off Cape Hatteras).