this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
760 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2372 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Yeah, I mean I knew that, you knew that, Americans are so uneducated that the majority had no idea how basic economics work.

Well FAFO, we're all going to learn the hard way I guess.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And fuck those of us who already knew the lesson. Its like school but without getting to go home at the end of the day. And just like school, the kids who need it probably wont pay attention

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Hearing more and more stories about companies cutting bonuses this year so they can buy more supplies now at cheaper prices. They know the prices will go up and they'll have to pass the increase to the consumers. But how much you wanna bet these companies will still raise prices even before they have to pay their tariff increases? They're gonna get extra money on the supplies they paid the lower prices on.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

...This is just normal basic business economics.

Your retail price is not predicated on what you paid to produce or obtain the product, it's based on what you expect to have to pay to produce or procure the next one.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Everything he will do contributes to anger, division and the collapse of the United States.

[–] NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org 19 points 1 day ago

People will be angry but angry at the wrong people. No, let's not be angry at the guy for actively destroying everyone's lives. Let's be angry at blacks. Or gay people. Or transgenders. Or police. Or scientists.

Fucking dumb Americans.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 233 points 1 day ago (8 children)

No shit.

This is literally in the first paragraph of every economics textbook when they talk about tariffs.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 136 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Donald Trump didn't win the Presidency by reading textbooks.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ThePerfectLink@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Realistically though, that's how tariffs just work. With products costing more, theoretically that should drive demand down and eventually lead to fewer imports. Of course, if there's still no competing product or the product is a basic necessity, then it'll likely just result in people paying more.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

We tried this in 2017. Trump put tariffs on dishwashers, and American companies just raised their prices to match, pocketing the difference.

[–] ThePerfectLink@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

Yah, I mean realistically, I can only really see tariffs working if a nation is trying to enter an industry. That's not the case here, but even so, these tariffs differ from the ones you mentioned because they would be against Chinese imports rather than a specific product, so I can't imagine there's as much risk of that sort of market manipulation from happening again... but then again, I've got no idea.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 5 points 22 hours ago

Yes, this is not news. News is supposed to be new information, this is entirely well known information, which stupid people just didn't care about

idk why anybody is surprised, republicans are still going to lie about it, they will never admit how tariffs work, they are simply incapable.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 113 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's a certainty, not a fucking "likelihood'. That's how they work.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›