this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
180 points (95.9% liked)

News

23311 readers
3556 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Arab Americans who supported Trump in battleground states like Michigan express concerns over his key appointments, particularly pro-Israel figures like Mike Huckabee, Marco Rubio, and Elise Stefanik, who oppose a two-state solution and back Israel’s actions in Gaza.

While some voters hoped Trump would prioritize peace in the Middle East, his picks have fueled unease about his administration’s direction.

Outreach leaders like Massad Boulos, who engaged Arab American communities during Trump’s campaign, have yet to secure roles, leaving some supporters questioning their expectations of Trump’s policies.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] islands@lemmy.cafe 25 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Did they forget the Muslim travel ban he tried to do in his first term? It was one of the first things he did in office. He has already told you who he is multiple, multiple times.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 13 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Trump just got reelected. America forgot about Trump's first term...

It's absolute insanity...

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 hour ago

America lives its life one quarter ~~mile~~ at a time... Nothing else matters: not the mortgage, not the store, not my team and all their bullshit. For those ~~ten seconds or less~~ three month, I’m free.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago

When you consider the drugs and toxins we consume, it isn’t that surprising. I feel like I blocked out a lot of memories from his first term, but I still had enough left to know it was a nightmare I didn’t want to repeat.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 31 points 5 hours ago

People kept saying, right up to the election, "don't vote for Harris because she supports genocide."

Those people got what they wanted and yet they're suddenly very unhappy about it. Interesting, isn't it?

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 27 points 5 hours ago

You were warned.

You refused to listen.

You refused to look at the evidence staring you in the face.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 6 hours ago

Leopards got your face eh

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 22 points 5 hours ago

German jews who voted for Hitler got concerned soon after the elections too. Many ethnic Germans too, but all they had to do was say "ich hab es nicht gewust" afterwards. The second World War has been so well documented. Yet many still haven't learned anything from history.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 23 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

“I just want you to think about what the alternative was,” said Abbas, referring to the current administration’s handling of Israel’s war in Gaza and its invasion of Lebanon. He added, “What did you expect from myself or many members of the community to do?”

I see Abbas is still in the denial stage.

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago

They're always so eager to never once think critically and to always let themselves off the hook. I'm sorry, but on the brink of societal and ecological collapse, I equate those who refuse to think with those who actively destroy.

[–] Bonifratz@lemm.ee 20 points 6 hours ago

It's fascinating how he didn't permanently lose the vote of the entire US Muslim community when he, you know, tried to institute a Muslim ban.

(I'm aware that "Arab Americans" doesn't equal "Muslim Americans" but there's a lot of overlap.)

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Guys I got this pet face-eating-leopard and it keeps trying to eat my face. :(

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 105 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

maaan… how the fuck are people this uninformed about who donald trump is and what he's about? did all these people think supporting him would curry them favor, and make their people safer than if a less insane candidate took office? like, i geuinely don't understand how you hear what this motherfucker says and not realize his whole entire deal i hating people who aren't cishet white men. like i can get my friend who the first ever election she voted in in our country was 2016 when she grew up with different formats of propaganda, but he was president for four years, and this go around he's been more mask off, and the people saying he's dangerous have been more direct in their messaging.

like… how are people this illiterate beyond just reading comprehension? like, why don't you got anything comprehension, what is this?

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 80 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

54% of American adults have the reading comprehnsion skills of a 5th grader, or worse.

How?

Republicans have spent many decades defunding public education, with no effective pushback.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 18 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Republicans have spent many decades defunding public education

Republicans have also spent many decades developing psychological operations aimed at controlling the news and churches.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, this as well.

All while the Democrat strategy was to... not do any effective counter propoganda at the same scale or in the same manner whatsoever, keep relying on the traditional media outlets that they also simultaneously know are dying and becoming more biased against them.

But then they also do a surprise pikachu face when the mediums they know are dying and irrelevant... don't reach people.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They simply don't have the funding to do the same operations at scale. Which is the whole point. Recently it was found out that Russians were funding Tim Fool and other right wing influencers to the tune of nearly $100,000 a week to put out a barely edited propaganda video once a week. Every two weeks he made as much money as recognizable notably left leaning media members like Sam Cedar earn in a year.

People keep posting about how Democrats keep breaking fundraising records. They only break them once every 4 years generally. And those are only the records we're aware of.

Between all the dark money behind groups like Fox News, OANN, daily wire, The Blaze, and millions of other smaller propaganda Outlets. None of whom turn a profit on their own or make money. They are funded through wealthy Investments because they know the propaganda pays dividends.

Democrats haven't had funding like that since before Reagan broke the unions. Which is specifically why Reagan broke the unions. And a lot of our problems can be traced back to the loss of Union power and Union fundraising.

You want to know why Democrats don't pay a lot of attention to the unions anymore. This is why. The unions and people in general cannot even begin to compete with the amount of money sloshing around out there for conservatives. And that's why Democrats have been out there so busy chasing it. Until we get rid of money in politics. Or actually find a way for regular people to begin to push back in similar ways there won't be a change.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 1 points 54 minutes ago

Well we can't get money out of politics because all the money will vote against getting money out of politics.

So any plan to do this will have to involve radical action outside of the norms of polite society which may or may not be against the rules of this community to describe in greater detail and specificity.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 19 points 8 hours ago (7 children)

we're going to fix this. i don't know how yet. and it won't be easy. and it won't be short term. but we're going to fix this, so read to a kid. make them remember reading time as the best part of their day. make them love the things AI can't twist: physical artifacts

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I appreciate your optimism, but my realism says no, no we probably won't.

We've got a maximum of 20 years, probably closer to 10, before millions, and then tens and then hundreds of millions of people around the world will be starving to death and attempting to mass migrate due to climate change, which we will not stop or mitigate.

Governments around the world will continue becoming more authoritarian.

Maybe we can make small, individual differences in our personal lives, but no, barring a worldwide overthrow of capitalism in some way that also does not result in a collapse of mass agriculture...

No, we are looking at famine, destruction and chaos, and decent, critical thought oriented education will be an even more minor funding priority for all but the ruling class and their neo-nobility children.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 7 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

we have two options to follow. we can do everything we can to make things better, or we can do nothing and everyone dies. personally i do not consider the latter viable. the former requires instilling hope that better things are possible. and here's the thing: if we all band together against authoritarianism we will reach some people who are currently not awake to the possibilities. to reiterate, it will not be easy and it will not be short term, but if you ask me of the two possible outcomes, the one where everyone dies or the one where everyone gets to be free, i prefer the one where everyone gets to be free. so i'm gonna do everything in my power to bring that one to pass, even if it's hard, unpleasant, or at times like right now seemingly impossible, but keep in mind every group faced with destruction passed down the messages they felt were most important, and always the message of the value of hope makes it through. hope is ultimately a weapon of resistance, one i refuse to give up

[–] rustydomino@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

My dude thanks for the message of positivity. Personally I think we’re fucked regardless but I do appreciate the thread of hope. I try to do what I’m can individually as well and sometimes it feels futile but it’s good to know that there are some of us (dozens even!) still trying to do the right thing.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Oh I didn't say we should do nothing.

What I am saying is, is that we are past the threshold of a good future, for all but the hyper wealthy.

Yes, we can do things to make it a less bad future for the masses, but there is no realistic plan where everyone, all 340ish million Americans, all 8 billionish humans, get to be free.

Telling everyone authoritarianism is bad is not an effective strategy.

Evidence: It's what leftists and liberals have been doing for 8 years and it resulted in the greatest Republican sweep since Reagan.

You have to actually do things, things which have a realistic chance of working.

If your plan is to hope really hard, the lesson our hypothetical ancestors will learn is: Hopium cheerleading is an exhausting, virtue signalling waste of time that accomplishes nothing when it is not paired with actual, actionable plans.

Have you got any of those?

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Have you got any of those?

For one thing, this is what fiction is for!

If you're like me, you probably know some people that fit in that neo-liberal democrat space: nice people, but definitely the kind MLK talked about as being an obstacle to progress. A lot of the time, they're also the people that "aren't into politics," because they have straight white privilege, and these issues usually don't affect them directly.

One of the reasons the right has been so successful since Roe v Wade is because they get organized. They meet, they talk, they plan, they take small local action. And, of course, these are the kinds of things that leftists talk about. We need to organize, we need to work together, we need to stop in-fighting, etc. But we don't have the natural advantage the right does.

Third places. They're built for the privileged and wealthy, and they fight to keep them that way. See campaigns against libraries. It's way harder for a Jew, an Arab, and a gay man to walk into a bar and sit down for a discussion than it is for a bunch of old white ladies to talk about their Saturday plans at a church potluck. Spaces for left-leaning political discussion don't really exist. Except in the realm of fiction.

Star Trek is, of course, a very well known example of progressive fiction. I, personally, am a big Trekkie. Here on Lemmy, there have been memes about the Bell Riots (a two part episode from DS9, involving the crew time traveling to September 2024). We were making those jokes because those episodes, especially today, are very topical. AND THAT WORKS!

I've had great conversations about those episodes with my centrist parents, as well as several acquaintances: conversations that deal with real topics, like homelessness, civic duty, and citizen action.

The right builds their fortress on a foundation of anti-intellectualism because shutting down other conversations is their most powerful weapon, and they've employed it to devastating effect. The atmosphere in our country has been curated to be hostile to political speech and philosophy. Just think of how much ridicule one would receive for recommending something like a salon to a group of friends, rather than something like a boardgame night (this is also affected by lack of free time, so support your unions!). It's for the same reason they sow division between minorities.

But fiction doesn't have this weakness! Have your friends over to watch some Star Trek, or lend out your copy of Men at Arms, and get Sir Terry Pratchett's Sam Vimes "Boots" Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness into the hands of an impressionable youth. AND THEN DISCUSS WHAT IT MEANS! Do some literary analysis. Talk about the realities that informed the art. Empathize with Jadzia as the cultural norms of her society demand she end her relationship with her former lover, simply because she's also a woman now. Then, suddenly you have your own group for leftist political discourse.

That's where it gets truly tough, but as was stated above, this is going to have to be a long term effort. This is a first step. It's up to us all to take one, and then the next, and then the next, just like those monsters that set out to repeal Roe v Wade 40 years ago, and only succeeded now.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

So your plan is to write subversive fiction, and have third places where people will talk about theories.

Uh ok neat, we are doing that here, virtually, and people have been doing this on the internet for two or three decades.

(Insert Einstein's definition of insanity here)

So again, what's the actionable, definable, realistic plan?

...

I'm currently getting my ass downvoted into oblivion in another thread for saying that software developers unwilling to sacrifice their livelihoods or lower their quality of life, and who instead continue to write software that directly promotes corporate profit seeking and spreads fascist propoganda are part of the problem, that they bare some degree of moral responsibility for societal degredation.

"Someone else will just do the job."

To me it looks like a great many people have a vast, in depth understanding of all of the things that are broken with society, but we are already past the threshold where all of these people who understand the problems...

... well, they're unwilling or materially unable to...

... you know, do anything about it.

tl:dr;

we are already neofeudal serfs.

discussing theory is great, but if it doesn't lead to any actual, implementable plans for change, nothing will change.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 1 points 3 hours ago

Uh ok neat, we are doing that here, virtually, and people have been doing this on the internet for two or three decades.

Which, I think, should be enough proof that this method doesn't work. Physical community ties are important. Look at red state medical gofundmes. That's basically socialized medicine (though the worst possible version of it lol), but they support it because they know the people they're supporting. Leftist policies consistently poll well across the board, but conservatives get elected anyway, because when these people go to church, their pastor tells them to vote for Trump. Or their family. Or their buddies from work. The people they interact with regularly, because those are the people that can use social normalcy to enforce their morals. You can't do that online.

We talk about making life uncomfortable for fascists because that kind of constant discomfort is what eventually gets people to self-reflect. You can't have a community hostile to Nazis, without first building up connections between people to enforce that hostility. That's why I put so much focus on just talking to your friends about a TV show. It's basically a Trojan horse. A way to start expanding the leftist community to people that haven't learned to debate, and don't know how to engage with media critically. Teach them.

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Also, vote for levies to fund local schools.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] penquin@lemm.ee 59 points 8 hours ago

As an Arab-American myself, I say fuck them. They deserve all the shit that's to come their way. The dude said it loud and clear "let Bibi finish the job". I know the Democrats didn't do shit either, but at least they never said they wanted to deport everyone, which means you'll still have a fucking voice. You can protest them when they're in office. He was very clear with his stance on minorities. Some of them argued with me about "nuclear family and religion" and fucking bullshit. Dumbasses, you don't need Trump to have a nuclear family and have your religion. It just never makes sense to me.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago

Yeah?

Trump is not concerned with your opinion.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

Don't care lol, he's doing what he said he would. Thanks for voting! Enjoy your prize!

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

I don't wish any negative effects to all the people in Gaza and the West Bank. I do, however, wish that the people who voted for Trump have to experience the kind of pain that the people in Gaza and the West Bank will experience under Trump. All these fuckers are safe over here and won't have to endure the kind of torture that voting in Trump will bring.

They protest voted against Harris because she personally wasn't stopping a war she had no power to stop, with the only alternative being the guy who will accelerate that war. They deserve everything that comes to them while I laugh in their fucking faces (at the same time crying actual tears for the victims of their betrayal over in Gaza).

[–] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 63 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

I don't understand how any Arab American could think Trump would advocate for peace in the middle east.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 45 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

he talks about peace, but it's obvious from the context he means the kind of peace hitler meant: the kind where everyone is dead at the end of the grand all consuming war

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I can’t believe those people took Trump seriously. The same guy who literally instated a muslim ban and uses the words arab/muslim/terrorist interchangeably.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 1 points 4 hours ago

The Muslim ban happened during his presidency, which was apparently too long ago for most of the electorate to remember. Honestly, it's an interesting insight into the workings of our political system. Maybe more presidents that lost their re-election bid should have tried again

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 14 points 8 hours ago

the lesson here is "gotdamn is propaganda effective, even to get people to do the absolute dumbest shit"

so start putting out messaging about how… not to be a shitty person where people who aren't guaranteed to agree with you will see and hear it

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 13 points 8 hours ago

This is not unique to Arab Americans.

There is a decent amount of Ukrainian Americans who support independent Ukraine, but also think Trump would stop the war and be a better choice for Ukraine. Although it seems that this is somewhat less common than in the Arab American community (I could be wrong).

This is of course complete bullshit. Trump is a corrupt American oligarch with degenerate tendencies. Oligarchs protect their gangs, expand their territory and give kickbacks to partner gangs (e.g. allowing unsafe "full self driving" rules for Elmo's organization). This is not even a Trump or American thing, this is universal.

With respect to Gaza, the Israeli oligarch gangs have far more money and influence on Trump's crew. Then there is also kinship ties.

But this was a shrewd move by Trump's crew. I think some proportion of the Arab American community will become life-long supporters irrespective of what happens in Gaza (I think their concern for Gaza is a bit more nuanced than what one may think at first glance).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

I'm already sick of this style of headline. Anyone else?

[–] kaitco@lemmy.world 18 points 8 hours ago

“I never thought the Leopards would eat MY face! Even though they specifically said they would and campaigned on eating all faces, I didn’t really think that they would be so focused on eating faces, especially not mine!”

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 21 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

GOOD. fuck everyone who voted for fascism. i look forward to reading about their dismay at the realization of just how fucked we all are

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 hours ago

If the left can organize to transform this disappointment into actual resistance, that will be worth something. Right now I think mass civil disobedience is the only thing that can really slow down the implementation of fascism, but it needs to be organized and we don't yet see anyone stepping up to organize real resistance.

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Lol and? Eat the shit pie you voted for.

[–] francisfordpoopola@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago

You get what you fucking pay for.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That's what I said and got banned. Poor bastards can't accept their stupidity. This is from the Palestine forum since they were complaining about Trump's new pick. Lol.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

It's true that Steven Miller came up with the first ban. The same Steven Miller who has been announced as part of the Trump 2.0 administration. It happened before, you have to be a little crazy to think it wouldn't happen again.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Trump is incredibly pro Israel.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Trump's plan for Ukraine is to give Putin everything he wants, and for Gaza and the West Bank it's to give Netanyahu everything he wants. That's what Trump has always meant when he says he can bring peace.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

I hope this topic for which numerous articles have been written won't have the knock on effect of a whole population of people being dragged and demonized in public. Certainly has that vibe to me.

load more comments
view more: next ›