this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
530 points (98.2% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2275 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

You know I am starting to think maybe this modern Islamic law is just not very good.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Again, just describing my understanding of reality, sorry it triggered you.

[–] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 47 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Pretty sure Mohammad didn't have strong opinions regarding internet privacy.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

That's the beauty of religion - if our gods and prophets did not materialize to contradict what we are saying in their name, that means they approve.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 7 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

I'm pretty sure Mohammad, Jesus, Buddha, and all the other gods would be concerned if they saw my porn history.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 40 points 1 day ago

No it isn't. The right to privacy is protected in Shariah law. Either something nefarious is at play here, or the religious body was misled on what VPN is.

Sources for those not familiar with Shariah law, I actually studied it and was tested on it:

https://www.al-islam.org/islam-and-rights-privacy-territory-abbass-khajeh-piri/realm-privacy-islam

and this is from a Pakistani university:

http://www.sbbu.edu.pk/actaislamica/vol%2005%20issue%2001/Right%20to%20Privacy%20A%20Comparative%20Perspective%20in%20Law%20&%20Shariah.pdf

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm really interested in reading the part of the Quran that forbids VPNs.

[–] Tuxman@sh.itjust.works 26 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

"Thou shalt not taketh sponsorships from NordVPN"

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 3 points 12 hours ago

NordVPN is a scam, they will prevent you from cancelling your plan

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 6 points 21 hours ago

"In this religion, we use ExpressVPN!"

Quran, probably

[–] just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

For context: this "religious body" is governmental.

In pakistan, military has gotten so powerful that they literally kidnap and torture you for being critical of them. And if you live outside pakistan they kidnap and torture your family members, demanding you to remove your posts.

And recently pakistani people have started to become more and more anti-military. So they are using VPNs to hide their identity to protect themselves.

This "religious body" is making it seem like this is to stop porn but in reality its about stopping people from being critical of military rule.

Edit: they banned twitter in february because people were organizing anti-military protests there. So the people started using VPNs and now they want to ban VPNs.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 9 points 21 hours ago

I wonder if me, and American, looking at Pakistan is like how Europeans look at America... Government and police are crazy. But the food, culture, and people are probably nice.

[–] Railison@aussie.zone 12 points 23 hours ago

Something something sneaking into other people’s houses is haram therefore VPN is haram?

[–] socsa@piefed.social 48 points 1 day ago (2 children)

US Christians: "write that down!"

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The "protect children online" act or whatever. Ugh.

[–] CPMSP@midwest.social 7 points 22 hours ago

KOSA. But yeah, same level of religious fuckery. They want to impose big brother because it's easier to root out dissent.

[–] BobGnarley@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

Won't be long now, unfortunately.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago (29 children)

Really wish our species could evolve past this moronic, religious bullshit.

[–] just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Its not about religion, its politics. A few years ago the Pakistani military overthrew a very popular prime minister who publicly said that it was the military behind his removal. Then slowly and gradually there was more and more evidence behind military involvement which as a result, made the public anti-military. They have been kidnapping and torturing anyone critical of them.

But the more they oppress, the more people become anti-military. It got to the point that in february the government blocked access to twitter because of anti-military sentiment, so people started using VPNs. Now this "religious body" which is government appointed claims to block VPN because "people are watching immoral things via VPN". But in reality, it is to stop people organizing protests.

Also a governmental body can not decide what is islamic or not, thats not how islamic law works. It has to come from islamic scholars and there needs to be consus on it.

I don't think any major islamic scholar who lives inside pakistan has signed or approved this message even though they want to stop porn they know its not about stopping porn, its about making it difficult to criticize the military.

[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Its not about religion, its politics.

It's about religion. In a theocracy religion is politics, and law, and culture too.

Religion isn't something that empowers people to do more or live more freely. Religious dogma is nothing more than a set of arbitrary laws and norms, written and decided by man, but given the weight and authority of god(s)--the fear of eternal damnation in the afterlife being the only way that people knew to keep others in line in a world devoid of secular laws.

How did we convince women that they were lesser beings throughout human history? Why do we consider some forms of consensual adult sexuality to be morally wrong? Why do we believe that human beings are destined and entitled to live on this planet forever no matter how poorly we treat it?

The answer is religion. Religion is mass delusion, used mainly as a tool of oppression. Socrates was sentenced to death by a jury of Athenians for thought crimes against Athena, showing that religion, democracy and justice simply do not mix. Thousands of years ago (or more) gods and religious law were the inventions that ushered humanity into the post-truth world that we live in today.

[–] just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Look we can criticize religion for its issues all we want but in this specific case, they are using religion as a tool to get what they want. If it weren't for religion, they would use something else.

"Terrorists are using VPNs to evade law enforcement"

Or maybe something racism related

Fascist/authoritarian governments always use something to control the public.

[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

they are using religion as a tool to get what they want.

This is what religion has always been used as. Religious law existed before civil law, because it's easy to get people to do what they're told if they believe that their godlike creator will punish them eternally for breaking the rules.

Again, how did people convince the world that gay sex is not only taboo but something to be entirely shunned and punished?

You tell them that it's a sin before the eyes of "God", who in his anger will turn you and anyone who even looks in your direction into a "pillar of salt" or whatever. Remember the existence of "sodomy" (read: homosexuality) in Sodom and Gomorrah wasn't just something bad, it was an mortal sin that supposedly wiped entire towns off the map, as they want you to believe that what your neighbor does in their bedroom isn't just their own business but also an existential threat to your entire society. In the literal interpretation of all 3 Abrahamic Religions, it's not enough to avoid homosexuality yourself, it has to be eliminated from society entirely lest we all end up like Sodom and Gomorrah...

And for what? Obviously we all know that the story of Sodom and Gomorrah is pure bullshit, even many religious people today hopefully don't take it literally...

But the simple truth is that someone, thousands of years ago, felt disgusted by homosexuality and created a big lie about it in order to convince people that gayness anywhere in society would eventually bring about God's wrath. And that utter fucking bullshit has lead to thousands of years of fear, discrimination, violence and hate, lasting even today in various degrees throughout the world. Humanity chose to go down this path when we chose to believe in religious lies.

Because THAT is exactly what religions does--that is what religion was designed to do: to keep people in line, to oppress undesirable people and qualities out of society, to avoid coming face to face with the unknown, and to impose the will of the few on the populace at large. Religion tells people what to eat, what to fuck, when and how they can listen to music, how to live and how to die. Outside of a few exceptions, it's mostly a toxic ideology that empowers nobody and oppresses billions of people all over the world, and to top it all off, it's just a bunch of fake, make-believe bullshit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Thing is privacy is protected in Islam, this has nothing to do with religion.

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] bender223@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anything is against religious law if you try hard enough.

Actually, you don't have to try that hard 🤷‍♂️

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

You challenged religious law. That's against the law.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

You are being excommunicated for resisting excommunication!

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 46 points 1 day ago

"It is not enough that Allah knows everything you do. We must also know."

"That sounds like blasphemy to me."

"Uh..."

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 122 points 1 day ago (17 children)

God would never use VPN, he has nothing to hide.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 83 points 1 day ago (1 children)

someone should point out to them that a vpn is the technological equivalent of the burqa.

either ban both, or allow both.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 73 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The Council of Islamic Ideology said the technology was being used in Pakistan to access content prohibited according to Islamic principles or forbidden by law, including “[...]websites that spread anarchy [...].”

So they admit it's not (only) about morals, but also (or mostly) about their position of power not being threatened.

BTW: By blocking access to the internet, they stop people from following the order in the Quoran which states that people should educate themselves.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

It’s almost as if they would tailor their religious doctrine to suit their own needs. Who could have imagined such a thing could happen.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 60 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Encryption is totally and completely haram

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Which is super fucking ironic:

David Kahn notes in The Codebreakers that modern cryptology originated among the Arabs, the first people to systematically document cryptanalytic methods.[15] Al-Khalil (717–786) wrote the Book of Cryptographic Messages, which contains the first use of permutations and combinations to list all possible Arabic words with and without vowels.[16]

The invention of the frequency analysis technique for breaking monoalphabetic substitution ciphers, by Al-Kindi, an Arab mathematician,[17][18] sometime around AD 800, proved to be the single most significant cryptanalytic advance until World War II. Al-Kindi wrote a book on cryptography entitled Risalah fi Istikhraj al-Mu'amma (Manuscript for the Deciphering Cryptographic Messages), in which he described the first cryptanalytic techniques, including some for polyalphabetic ciphers, cipher classification, Arabic phonetics and syntax, and most importantly, gave the first descriptions on frequency analysis.[19] He also covered methods of encipherments, cryptanalysis of certain encipherments, and statistical analysis of letters and letter combinations in Arabic.[20][21] An important contribution of Ibn Adlan (1187–1268) was on sample size for use of frequency analysis.[16]

Ahmad al-Qalqashandi (AD 1355–1418) wrote the Subh al-a 'sha, a 14-volume encyclopedia which included a section on cryptology. This information was attributed to Ibn al-Durayhim who lived from AD 1312 to 1361, but whose writings on cryptography have been lost. The list of ciphers in this work included both substitution and transposition, and for the first time, a polyalphabetic cipher[23] with multiple substitutions for each plaintext letter (later called homophonic substitution). Also traced to Ibn al-Durayhim is an exposition on and a worked example of cryptanalysis, including the use of tables of letter frequencies and sets of letters which cannot occur together in one word.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_cryptography#Medieval_cryptography

But then Pakistanis aren't Arabs....

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›