this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
62 points (79.2% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2407 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chase_what_matters@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I’d say you can lead a horse to water etc etc but the Democratic Party can barely even lead the horse anymore.

[–] astanix@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

In this analogy I don't think the Democratic Party knows what a horse is.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Pundits are losing their minds, but I don't think the Democratic party leaders are giving up.

My hunch is that they are playing the long game. They are counting on three things. First, Trump's plans will crash the economy. Second, the Trump White House always turns on its own. Third, with a GOP trifecta there isn't much Democrats can do to stop Trump - for now.

So any demands they make now will be ignored, and even used in the future to blame Democrats as obstructionist. I think they are lying low and giving the GOP what they need to hang themselves. When the public is furious about the economy, it will be time to start making demands.

Basically, it's the political equivalent of the Willy Wonka gif

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

My hunch is that they're in denial, still trying to treat the situation as "business as usual," and will make for very surprised corpses when Trump's thugs put them up against the wall.

[–] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They kind of have to, I suspect. But it won't work. They'll see things go bad, put in their sound bite as "we need to do something about ___!" And the average American won't see it, and instead be inundated with right wing "Democrats are screwing it all up!" And not think of the logic that the Democratic party can't do anything. And they'll vote Republican again.

Democrats need to get better at media.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

they'll vote Republican again.

That's not how midterms usually work. More people will vote for Democrats in 2026 than 2024. The key is maximize just how many more.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

The Democratic Party resembles the horse, or at least part of it.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Tbf I expected way better of Americans than to fall for Trump twice.

The Democratic Party might as well give up if they are still going to try to keep rooting for same old, same old. Blame media both sidesing and sanewashing, blame unlimited money in politics, blame your average voter's lack of critical thought. If the party leadership doesn't want change, if media doesn't want actual change, then it's hard to expect anything good from them for the time being. Governor Kathy Hochul is a prime example, she keeps kneecapping good policies at the last second like proper right to repair and congestion pricing, thinking like playing political games is going to help anyone. It's not, it only hurts us.

All blue states and blue cities in purple and red states can do right now is show themselves as shining beacons of democracy and progress as the remainder of states get absolutely screwed by the feds. The Dem party as a whole needs to take a moment and rethink its strategy.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 22 points 2 days ago

You know what you call people who voted for fascism? Fascists.

[–] awake01@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

I mean, yeah.. I don't blame them. America has spoken and they aren't interested in education, science, ethics, honesty, integrity, and certainly not any intellectualism. That is all sucker nerd shit. Good luck getting ahead with any of that sucker. I like people who just take what they want. - America

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean I've basically given up on this country. It's so irredeemable at this point I don't see what my paltry involvment will matter. Bunch of people fucked around and now we all get to find out whether we wanted to or not. I can't keep expending energy fighting stupid.

[–] undercrust@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago

Switch tactics to firearms training. At least it's a useful skill regardless of the future.

[–] AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social 12 points 2 days ago

TFW you read the article, read the comments, then reread the article assuming you must have missed something.

You didn't.

[–] WatDabney@fedia.io 14 points 2 days ago

Civilizations are born, then they live, then they die.

The US is critically ill, and at this point, it looks terminal. It might not be, but the odds are that it is.

And that, as they say, is that.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 11 points 2 days ago

undermines the foundation of democracy to make line go up

is shocked when it starts to collapse

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I'm still processing.

I'm definitely not giving up. I've thought about just being more blunt with people. But I'm naturally an empathetic person. So I'll probably still listen to people and try to understand. Some people are just freaking ignorant though. And it's frustrating to see people who disagree with everything Trump stands for still vote for him because they don't like Democratic vibes.

[–] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The article is okay but I'm struggling with the author's conflation of misanthropy and misandry. Both are mentioned, but only one applies. It could be that the author made a typo, but the tone of the article to me suggests otherwise.

Fixed my own typo.

I think this is what they were talking about about when labeling liberals with "misandry":

“White men without college degrees are going to ruin this country.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Finally, a Jacobin article I agree with.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

Most Americans don't understand what an election is they just think it's funny content like pranks or something