this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
19 points (85.2% liked)

News

23301 readers
3511 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FruitfullyYours@lemmy.world 75 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] Gork@lemm.ee 13 points 2 days ago

It's like spitting out of a moving car. It's just going to hit you in the face.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Was going to say, why wouldn't it be the USA.

Competition is... well about competitive. A unilateral Tariff hurts everyone equally.

So if China was selling batteries to the US at $4

Taiwan was selling them at $3.90

You slap a $2 tarrif on both countries.

China raises the price to $6 to compensate, Taiwan to $5.90, Both countries make the same profit per battery sold. Unless there happens to be a US company that can make the batteries at $5 (not likely as we don't currently have the infrastructure, and a lot of products are dependent on natural resources that we just don't have).

[–] rimu@piefed.social 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

China raises the price to $6 to compensate, Taiwan to $5.90

Not quite. It's not the foreigners who pay the tariffs, it's the locals. The tariff is charged at customs when the product enters the country and the people paying that are the people doing the importing. Tariffs don't bring more money into the country, they just penalize local people who import goods from overseas. It's a tax. Back when Republicans were consistent they hated all taxes, heh.

From the point of view of the local consumer it makes no difference - the price rises unless there is a locally made substitute they can buy instead.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The price rises even if there’s a locally made substitute, because odds are that it costs more to make locally, and the price floor is now higher, too

[–] elgordino@fedia.io 6 points 2 days ago

Even if it doesn’t cost more to make it locally you can just hike your prices anyway if your only competitors have tariffs applied.

[–] marsara9@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's worse than that. As the other comment said, it's the consumer who pays the tarrif but let's assume today:

  • China can produce a battery for $4
  • Twian does the same for $3.90
  • USA can only make one for $5

Let's then assume that for all 3 countries 25% of the cost is the raw Nickel that goes into the battery. Let's also assume that it's a flat 20% tariffs across the board.

Now your prices become:

  • China -- $4.80
  • Twian -- $4.68
  • USA -- $5.25

Increase it to a 60% tariff:

  • China -- $6.40
  • Twian -- $6.24
  • USA -- $5.75

So no matter what, prices go up even for the US manufacturer as they still have to import raw materials. The tariffs end up making local manufacturing more competitive with overseas at the cost of the consumer. As consumers just saw the price of batteries go from $4.00 to $5.75, a whopping 43% increase. Yay inflation!

The original idea behind tarrifs are just that... To give local businesses a competitive advantage while they catch up to overseas products. Once the US company is established you can then drop the tariff as they no longer need help while they ramp up manufacturing.

So maybe the US manufacturer costs might go down, if they're able to make more at scale, but they still have to beat the automatic 75c increase because of their own imports. And all of that is still assuming that the tariff is large enough to make the US company the cheapest option. Otherwise it may end up backfiring and cause less sales as consumers end up not paying the increased costs. As you can see above with only a 20% tariff.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

"Why would China do this?"

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 days ago

The US, ffs. Tariffs hurt US.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

This happened during the administration of Andrew Jackson, Trump's favorite president excluding himself. It's worth reading about because it's interesting how history repeats itself:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariff_of_Abominations