this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
1434 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

11068 readers
2766 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 131 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The world just keeps getting more and more efficient at being dumb. Let's just count all the appallingly stupid things crammed into this small meme with 2 million views:

  1. "Insurrection Barbie"
  2. Celebrating the defunding of useful scientific research by a new government efficiency agency
  3. This new agency is named after a cryptocurrency
  4. The cryptocurrency in question was created as a joke to satirize cryptocurrencies, but became a top prominent cryptocurrency itself.
  5. The "Department of Government Efficiency Agency" has 2 heads, both of whom have other primary jobs and were chosen in return for political support.
  6. There is also already an existing government agency that does the exact same thing, called the "Government Accountability Office". But most people seem to be unaware of it, likely because it's not named after a cryptocurrency/dog meme.
  7. This whole scheme was the idea of the richest person in the world.

Idiocracy didn't happen because of unnatural selection, it happened because social media unlocked a runaway chain reaction of stupidity.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 18 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Why are people saying that it was named after a cryptocurrency?

Isnt the dog the first thing people think of when seeing "doge"?

[–] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 49 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Its reasonable to make the connection to the coin, as this particular cryptocurrency was propagandized and manipulated by musk, who will be running the agency.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago

Isnt the dog the first thing people think of when seeing “doge”?

It used to be so, but in recent several years Doge has lived and pretty much been defined in public consciousness by the cryptocurrency, which Musk has openly endorsed/memed.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 18 points 2 days ago

True! It was then technically named after a meme...which the coin named itself after, as it was supposed to be a "meme coin".

Still stands though.

"Government agency named after meme. Such dumb. So chaos. Woooooow." Lol

[–] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is it better to be named after a stupid meme instead?

[–] zagaberoo@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 days ago

Yes, Kabosu was a gem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ethalis@jlai.lu 303 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Sure, that's great but it's not even the point. Fundamental research and other type of "useless" scientific endeavors help humanity as a whole to better understand our universe but would never be privately funded because they don't have any concrete and immediate financial benefits. This is precisely what a government should finance, because no one else would do it and yet it's small stuff like that that make us collectively move forward as a species

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 84 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Musk fans don't want humanity to advance. They hate technological progress.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 44 points 2 days ago

For OTHERS, yes. But many want the cutting edge for themselves, at no cost to themselves.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bronzle@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Oh, they’ll probably publicly fund it for private profit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 108 points 2 days ago (16 children)

Say it with me:

No. Research. Is. Useless.

If we say that research is useless because it doesn't bring you mo ey we could stop teaching children math beyond the absolute basics because "it doesn't brinf them anything". This is stupid, because those are the fundamentals that tech children to thing logically and become useful member of society. Same with research. It teaches us the things necessary to maybe invent some of the most useful stuff ever seen

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 71 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Republicans: "No. Research is useless."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 days ago

Republicans want drones and cannon fodder, not scientists and intellectuals.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] mac@lemm.ee 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The appointment of Elon Musk to lead the proposed department of government efficiency raises concerns, given his track record of business management.

His handling of Twitter/X after its $44 billion acquisition has resulted in a significant decline in its value, with some sources putting the valuation around $9bn.

Doesn't seem very efficient to me.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Not just significant, I'm pretty sure the loss in value is some sort of a record, for real.

[–] GreatTitEnthusiast@mander.xyz 120 points 2 days ago (2 children)

In addition, government research in the sciences is miniscule. You could cut ALL of science funding and be no where close to the 1 trillion that Musk claims he'll be able to reduce the budget by

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Regardless, he'll claim he cut 500 bajillion dollars no matter what he ends up doing

[–] BananaOnionJuice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 2 days ago (3 children)

My bet is that if he expects to cut 2 trillion, he will end up increasing the budget by 4 trillion.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He actually claimed 2 trillion.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I knew Elongated Muskrat was a dumbass but I didn't know he also can't do math.

[–] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I don't think he even attempted to do math. Someone asked him about it and said what the current budget was, and he just rectally sourced 2 trillion. I assume he said that because it's big enough to sound huge, but less than half of spending so people don't panic that everything will be cut.

It's meaningless bullshit until he actually says specifically what will be cut. Republicans have been claiming they can cut huge chunks of spending for years, but it never materializes. They only know how cut government income without paying for it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 113 points 2 days ago (4 children)

And so the US lost decade becomes the medieval dark ages

It'd be fascinating as an outsider if the choices made by the US didn't basically impact everything, everywhere.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 89 points 2 days ago (3 children)

"preventing next corn plague" with resources used being a box of soil and bunch of underpaid grads seems pretty efficient to me, but i guess that since the common clay of the new west already voted they can be safely disposed of

at USDA, they're turning beetles kinky! 😡

  • alex jones fuming aimlessly while being stored in some container
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

The Onion buying Infowars is the only good news I've heard this week.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

China is going to devour the scientific world if we keep it like this

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 14 points 2 days ago

Won't happen, or at least won't be useful if it does. Lotta Chinese authors are faking data for the sake of the CCP and their studies don't replicate. If that takes over, it'll be like a global Dark Age.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Going to continue devouring the scientific world with lots of smart Westerners leaving the new SlaveTastic^tm^ USA

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Neolib idiots don't see the (immense) value of fundamental research because it doesn't directly generate profits, more at 11

[–] ReCursing@lemmings.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They're not neolibs, they're fascists. The Democrats are neolibs

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

True, but I don't think many of them would say that to your face (including musk who I assume would pretend to be neolib, who do kind of have a hate boner for basic research, at least in my country)

[–] ReCursing@lemmings.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Fascists lie, including about being fascists. Trump is a fascist, his party are fascists, those who work for him, even if they don't go all in on fascists values, are absolutely tarrable with the same brush. The biggest difference between them and the Nazis is that the Nazis had better dress sense

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Like the dead don't realize they're dead, they don't realize they're stupid. They're just everyone else's problem.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 29 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Welcome to the new Dark Ages, brought to you by religious fascists.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Welcome to a new era of weaponized ignorance

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's also helped develop advances in flight, metamaterials, physics.

But Barbie makes a good point with a meme about how she treats her cuck husband.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Goddamn, it really is impossible!
How the fuck am I gonna filter US politics out of my feed when it creeps in through Science Memes?

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 16 points 2 days ago

There's only one way to filter politics out of your time online: don't go online.

load more comments
view more: next ›