this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
1026 points (96.5% liked)

Comic Strips

12602 readers
3107 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'll tip my hat to the new Constitution
Take a bow for the new revolution
Smile and grin at the change all around
Pick up my guitar and play
Just like yesterday
Then I'll get on my knees and pray
We don't get fooled again

Yeah
Meet the new boss
Same as the old boss

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If these Republican idiots actually believed in small government, they'd be Libertarians.

They'd still be idiots, but they'd be Libertarians.

[–] C126@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

Both love big gov, just slight differences in which wars they want to support and which industries will get government funding.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If Libertarians were libertarians, they'd oppose the Taft-Hartley Act.

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If libertarians were libertarians, they'd know what the Taft-Hartley Act is... and maybe, who Taft and... Hartley are to begin with, but only if we're being really optimistic.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

It's never "small government" when it comes to funding pig.

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 120 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (6 children)

Except the "Small government" is even bigger. The only difference is that all the money gets handed to oligarchs. The Republicans have never reduced spending while in power.

This kind of shit is why the right keeps winning. Even the people that oppose them buy into their framing and repeat their lies and propaganda.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

Yeah, the fifth panel is the billionaires stuffing their private jets with the cash over the corpse of the big government.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Fucking TSA, 2 decade long wars.... Republicans have NEVER reduced spending or increased liberties. It's all bullshit, but their propaganda machine is simply miles ahead because they have almost zero infighting.

Democrats are constantly bickering, and not about just important stuff. I fully believe there are bad actors purposefully starting arguments about BS they know Democrats will latch on and distract us. And as a bonus make us look like lunatics to anyone not already fully aligned with our ideas.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The right is REALLY good at messaging it's insane. The culture wars they start have created a "bogeyman" and it's insane.

I really hate it and how it sticks to the zeitgeist. It just makes me sad.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

It's because the right gets what they want by tearing things down and destroying, and instilling fear. It's inherently much easier to destroy and scare people than to build and inspire people

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 22 points 4 days ago

Building giant walls, deporting people en masse, surveillance society, making sure women's rights are held at bay, placing and enforcing restrictions on clean energy - all things that sound "small government"? As dumb as they are, I don't think I've even heard the Republicans using this phrase lately - it's so ridiculous.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

They increase spending on really stupid shit that have no legs but will absolutely gut useful services. People aren’t wrong to be mad when they see their stuff get defunded and that’s the important stuff many are going to focus on. So you’re right but it’s not as simple as that.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Is that not what this comic is saying?

Showing the blatant hypocrisy?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The comic shows a smaller govt and says that's bad for the poor.

The person to whom you're responding is saying Republicans actually create a bigger government that's worse for the poor.

They're spending less on social services and frittering it away on government bibles that only Trump sells.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

See I saw it as an irony type thing where the artist is showing the blatant hypocrisy of the idea of govt so small it fits into every household.

Maybe I'm just overthinking it.

[–] C126@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No the comic is showing the government is litterally small, implying welfare cuts. Reality is, any "cuts" are just going to be moved somewhere else. Not given back to the tax payers.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

That's fair I just thought it was done to showcase the hypocrisy of a govt small enough to fit in your pants.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 85 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Small gov't is usually a lie anyway. It's a smokescreen for "actually we're still going to tell you what to do."

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 35 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They strip away everything that actually helps people, so in that way it's really small.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

So small it'll fit in your vagina.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

They compartmentalize accountability. It's easy to say it's some other guy. Then he gets fired, replaced and fights for the chance to have it happen again.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

It’s small because they have zero oversight and they only need to worry about one party. Hurray!

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

There are people who, disturbed by "big government" today and its tendency to curb the advantages they might gain if their competitiveness were allowed free flow, demand "less govern- ment." Alas, there is no such thing as less government, merely changes in government. If the libertarians had their way, the distant bureaucracy would vanish and the local bully would be in charge. Personally, I prefer the distant bureaucracy, which may not find me, over the local bully, who certainly will. And all historical precedent shows a change to localism to be for the worse.

—Isaac Asimov, Nice Guys Finish First, collected in The Sun Shines Bright, 1981

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 49 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The smallest government is a dictatorship.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

Small dick tater

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago

Republicans want tyranny, not small government.

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 19 points 4 days ago

Government so small it fits not only within your bedroom, but within your uterus!

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

Yeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh!!!!

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Me when "small government" supporters don't start by defunding the police

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

And now I shall imagine that's what all ftp:// URLs are saying.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago

Fuck the poor, fuck the old, fuck the environment, fuck soldiers and veterans, fuck the sick, fuck food safety...

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

"small government"

As long as you're a Cis white Christian male that didn't go to college

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Pick up my guitar and play

[–] zarathustra0@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Surely small Government means repealing all that red tape enforcing individual property rights too?

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Updoots for use of "go on, get!".

There's a new improved version being pushed now which introduces itself by saying "fuck everyone except the incredibly wealthy".