this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
56 points (93.8% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3202 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"Voters in liberal strongholds across the country, from city centers to suburban stretches, failed to show up to vote for Vice President Kamala Harris at the levels they had for Joseph R. Biden Jr. four years earlier, contributing significantly to her defeat by Donald Trump,” the New York Times reports.

“Counties with the biggest Democratic victories in 2020 delivered 1.9 million fewer votes for Ms. Harris than they had for Mr. Biden. The nation’s most Republican-heavy counties turned out an additional 1.2 million votes for Mr. Trump this year, according to the analysis of the 47 states where the vote count is largely complete.”

“The drop-off spanned demographics and economics. It was clear in counties with the highest job growth rates, counties with the most job losses and counties with the highest percentage of college-educated voters. Turnout was down, too, across groups that are traditionally strong for Democrats — including areas with large numbers of Black Christians and Jewish voters.”

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Enjoy your Trump administration all of you dems who couldn’t be bothered to vote.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If we truly live in a democratic state, shouldn't the onus of be on the candidate to capture the desires and will of the electorate and not the duty of the citizen to vote for the party?

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

It's both. And a candidate failing to earn your vote doesn't absolve you of the responsibility to protect democracy from a fascist when the situation presents itself.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

I'm glad all that AIPAC money was worth it. Good thing Kamala had the fundraising edge over Trump. It sure did her a lot of good.

It turns out that while, "vote for my candidate. She may be Mussolini, but at least she's not Hitler. She's the objectively better choice!" may be objectively true, it's a shit campaign strategy and message.

Don't ask people to vote for something they consider cartoonishly evil and then be surprised when they refuse.

Enjoy your Trump administration, all you dems who honestly expected LEFT WING VOTERS to just be OK with a genocide.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The one good thing that is coming from this is that this loss is motivating liberal voters to build a "Guillotine Party", to do to Democratic leadership what the Tea Party did to the GOP.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

build a "Guillotine Party", to do to Democratic leadership what the Tea Party did to the GOP.

Wait, what?

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know if it will happen, but it absolutely should. We need to purge the corporate centrists from the Democratic leadership. They've delivered nothing but loss after loss after loss. Biden only barely managed to squeak out a win in 2020 because of Covid and by promising to run as a one-term caretaker president.

These tone-deaf idiots have the same fucking playbook every damn time. Their playbook is:

  1. Prevent a primary if possible.

  2. If a primary must occur, use any dirty trick necessary in the primary to make sure a corporate centrist whens the primary.

  3. Once the centrist has the nomination, try to win by moving ever-more conservative and try to win over moderate Republicans.

In contrast, Republicans run with a platform that will actually energize their base, and they win.

Meanwhile, Democrats run candidates that their own polling shows will tank their chances of winning and will anger their base. Then they try to make up for the lost base voters by hoping that, maybe this time, Republicans will actually vote for a Democrat.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Exactly.

Our focus needs to be on class issues: Wealth disparity, healthcare, housing. We need big, systemic solutions, not bandaids.

  • Top tier income tax rate needs to return to the punitive levels it was at before Reagan: Ultra-high earners need to decide between spending a lot of money on tax deductible expenses (like labor), or giving the majority of that money to the IRS.

  • We need a wealth tax. Not on all wealth, just certain kinds of assets. Specifically, a tax on registered securities, such as stocks, bonds, and other financial instruments. Exempt the first $10 million held by natural persons, as we do need capital investment. However, that capital should be coming from (and owed back to) the working class. Pretty much every worker should be receiving shares of their company as part of their compensation.

  • Rent needs to die in a goddamn fire. Hardly anybody should be renting residential property. To that end, we need massive increases on property taxes that are exempted for owner-occupants. Raise the property taxes (and exemptions) and keep raising them, until the landlords figure out they can make more money as private lenders to their (former) tenants than as landlords to those same tenants. The few actual landlords remaining will be owners of duplexes, triplexes, and quadplexes, who live in one of the units and rent out the remainder. Apartment complexes will be reconfigured as condominiums.

  • Universal Healthcare. True universal healthcare. Single payer. You show up at the doctor's office, urgent care, ER, pharmacy, and you'll never see a bill. We'll pay for it with that securities tax. Employer-sponsored healthcare can remain a thing, but there should be no tax benefit or other public support for it.

  • We do need a minimum wage (around $15/hr today) but we need a "standard wage" that is substantially higher. (Around $22/hr today) A living wage. All businesses must pay at least a minimum wage. Large businesses (Or franchisees of large businesses) must start at that standard wage.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I'd eagerly vote for this platform. Are you running?

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Are you looking for a VP?

Edit : also, cap political donations or even better, every candidate that gets a certain amount of signatures gets a set amount of campaign cash from the Fed, and they can't spend any more than that.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I don’t think that will happen. I think the dems are suffering from lack of leadership and direction. The party is too frayed to be effective at anything.

[–] Bleys@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The difference between the left and the right is that many Republican voters will vote for a candidate based on a single issue, while many Democrat voters will not vote for a candidate based on a single issue.

I’m genuinely not sure if there is a set of policies the left can offer which will adequately appeal to their entire base. I think the best case is another 2008 Obama who didn’t actually campaign on much hard policy other than just idealistic “hope”, which meant that a lot of voters could see what they wanted in him.

Meanwhile Republicans will continue to destroy the country while throwing out scraps like marginally lower taxes (but much lower for the rich).

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I’m genuinely not sure if there is a set of policies the left can offer which will adequately appeal to their entire base.

"Eat the rich" might do it.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think it's less lack of voter turnout and more that 2020 pushed vote by mail hard due to the covid restrictions. That ended up inflating the turnout, and I'm sure you know, when more people vote, Democrats win.

Without that same VBM push, turnout dropped.

2020:

Biden - 81,283,501
Trump - 74,223,975

2024* (so far):

Trump - 74,846,364
Harris - 71,259,005

Trump never relied on vote by mail, and, in fact, told his supporters not to do it. His numbers didn't effectively change +622,389 out of 74,846,364 = +0.8%

Joe DID and now we see the results... 10 million lost votes.

But look at states who are 100% vote by mail already:

Oregon 2020:
Biden - 1,340,383
Trump - 958,448

Oregon 2024* (so far):
Harris - 1,155,481
Trump - 861,020

But in a state like PA that went hard for vote by mail in 2020 and not so much in 2024:

Pennsylvania 2020:
Biden - 3,458,229
Trump - 3,377,674

PA 2024:
Trump - 3,511,865
Harris - 3,366,829

Harris is dead last out of all 4 numbers.

[–] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago

Your numbers don't show that it's vote by mail. Kamala lost ~ 13% compared to Biden nationwide and in your example vote by mail state Oregon she lost ~14%

California isn't in yet but doing some rough math she looks like she'll get ~9 million total compared to Biden who got over 11 million, so around an 18% drop in another very heavy vote by mail state.