this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024

306 points (99.4% liked)

Not The Onion

12314 readers

188 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

306

Wicked movie: Mattel 'deeply regrets' porn site misprint on dolls (www.bbc.co.uk)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

42 comments fedilink hide all child comments

They linked to wicked.com when the movie site is at wickedmovie.com

all 43 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 9 points 6 days ago

A discussion on the other site claimed that the fuck-up was in the copy that Universal sent to Mattel.
And that wrong websites frequently end up on packaging in other industries.

Mattel seem to be doing the sorry-dance for it, so no idea if it's true. Though I'm sure Universal would be very keen to not be involved.

[–] 000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago

Mattel regrets being in the news and keeping attention

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 113 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I suspect those dolls, still in the packaging, will be quite the collector's item in the future.

[+] Deceptichum@quokk.au -18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

You expect people to care about Wicked merchandise, misprint or not, in the future?

The value of these items isn't purely from their rarity but also their demand. If it was Star Wars or something yeah maybe it'll last.

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 83 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

You expect people to care about Wicked merchandise, misprint or not, in the future

This is such a Lemmy take. Ariana Grande is one of the biggest pop stars in entertainment, and Wicked is ONE OF THE BEST SELLING BROADWAY SHOWS EVER. Only behind the Lion King in total sales I think.

If a doll from Ariana's dinky little Nickelodeon tv show (don't come for me Victorious stans) is selling for this much, how much do you think her doll from Wicked is gonna sell for to the Broadway enthusiasts and Ariana stans?

Not everything is for you, but that doesn't make it irrelevant.

[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is she the same person to get korean bbq tattooed on her hand?

[–] SpoopyKing@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 1 week ago

No, what an utterly ridiculous lie to spread. She would never get "Korean bbq" tattooed on her hand, she's a multimillionaire with tons of resources at her disposal to prevent a silly mistake like that. Instead, she got "small charcoal grill" instead of "seven rings". But don't worry, she got it fixed apparently, so it instead correctly read ... "small charcoal finger grill".

[+] Deceptichum@quokk.au -33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Because she’s popular right now. We’re talking about the future, do you think Wicked has the longevity of other popular franchises? Is Wicked as big as Harry Potter was? Because that has some staying power behind it.

[–] mostNONheinous@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

You do realize Wicked is based on a 85 year old movie right?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

The play is extremely popular at 21 years old. I saw it as a teenager and enjoy when bits of it come back into my mind despite never really being into it. But there definitely are people still obsessed with it. It’s a damn good play.

[–] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I think she's a singer or something. 🤷‍♀️

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 41 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

do you think Wicked has the longevity of other popular franchises

Babes, Wicked has been a musical theatre darling since 2003. It already HAS longevity and popularity, just not in your circles. Once again, 2nd biggest Broadway show of all time, (actually of this millennium.) It's not #1 only because Lion King has been around longer.

The Broadway Girls™️ and Broadway Gays™️ are coming for that merch, and so are the Ariana Stans. Again, look at the price of that Cat Valentine doll.

(Also, comparing Harry Potter to Wicked is funny because of how they're two of the THE 2008-2015 Tumblr fandoms (ignoring Superwholock))

[+] Deceptichum@quokk.au -28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The difference is Harry Potter was an all ages international phenomenon, not just a Tumblr fandom.

So few things actually become collectibles, you’d have more luck with a beanie baby than you would this misprint Wicked merch long term.

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You missed every point I made.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunately it's not a conversation, they've already decided their right and no amount of illumination on their obvious blindspots is gonna change that.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It’s important to figure out if the other person is really playing the same ballgame as you are. Once you realize that the rule books don’t match, it’s time to cut your losses and move on.

Took me many years to understand that, but once I did, I’ve saved so much time. For example, you might be talking to a flat-earther thinking that it’s a debate where logic and facts matter. Spoiler: it’s not. The rules aren’t what you initially thought, and there’s no way to win. You winning just isn’t in their rule book at all.

[–] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

I saw the Harry Potter movies.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

We’re talking about the future

From the perspective of when the play got launched, we are already in the future. And it's still massively popular. Your point?

Is Wicked as big as Harry Potter was?

Comparing just the stage plays? Definitely, it's in fact orders of magnitude bigger.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago

do you think Wicked has the longevity of other popular franchises? Is Wicked as big as Harry Potter was?

Do you think people view Victorious as a popular franchise today?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Idk theater girls love Wicked. The question is how much demand that supports for a porn misprint.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

I know theater girls and I know theater gays. The former may like it, the latter will love it

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm always surprised to go another day where I don't hear anyone mention the risk of this mixup with Tushy, the anal porn site, and Hello Tushy, the bidet company.

[–] SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe they do crossover marketing?

[–] magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

People who do butt stuff are probably a huge market for bidets in America, and other places that they aren't as common.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 6 days ago

You need more than a bidet to clean your asshole for penetration

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You’re not gonna tell us the website?

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 51 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Body of the post, right under the link description.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

sounds like it wasn't intentional.

or at least plausible deniability is a thing.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m on mobile. I legit don’t see it anywhere. I must be blind.

[–] hoch@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Might be time to get a better Lemmy app

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Oh. I was looking in the article itself.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

OP says they linked to wicked.com, which I've never heard of but does look like a pay porn site.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I checked it out... for science. Has big "brunch team" energy. The subscription should come with a free bowl of soup.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Also it doesn't seem to let you see anything risque without logging in, so honestly even if a kid went to the site they wouldn't see anything

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You can def see some clips on there without logging in

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Ah, I didn't do enough digging

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

I only found them bc I was pretty sure an ex and I rented one from that company on VHS in the 90s so I went looking to see if they still had the really old ones.

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

nice

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nice

[–] hemmes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Nice