this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
100 points (100.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6629 readers
844 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Little noise, no thermal signature, low maintenance, way more fun than walking to war

mega based

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 12 points 1 week ago

Honestly, if you mounted some of these on a couple 1kw e-bikes with fat tires and suspension for better off-roading, you could get some nice hit-and-run squads, assuming you could clear or detect area-denial weapons.

Mount an MG on one, a recoil less rifle on another, maybe some form of rocket launcher for heavier armor.

It's not going to take over any countries, but a fast attack force that can clear rough terrain quickly is worth it's weight in gold.

5 bicycle boys vs 10000000 Gen 5 tanks and 27 lions, who wins?

[–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Little noise

Well, until you grab the wrong lever to brake.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Boost assist for uphill.

https://what-if.xkcd.com/21/

The GAU-8 Avenger fires up to sixty one-pound bullets a second. It produces almost five tons of recoil force, which is crazy considering that it’s mounted in a type of plane (the A-10 “Warthog”) whose two engines produce only four tons of thrust each. If you put two of them in one aircraft, and fired both guns forward while opening up the throttle, the guns would win and you’d accelerate backward.

To put it another way: If I mounted a GAU-8 on my car, put the car in neutral, and started firing backward from a standstill, I would be breaking the interstate speed limit in less than three seconds.

[–] SonicBlue03@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The gun sight seems unnecessary unless the rider is going to shoot out their own tire and wants accuracy.

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I assume the idea is to ride to a good spot then use the bike from a kneeling position

[–] SonicBlue03@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

I try not to get too hung up on logic but that makes sense.

[–] whithom@discuss.online 7 points 1 week ago

Portland Oregon militia.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's a hipster bicycle if I've ever seen one before. Remove the machine gun and it would fit right in at the Microsoft campus.

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Look how they massacred our military style assault bikes of war

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 week ago

Crotch destroyer 3000

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why does the bike wheels have extra small wheels.

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

I think it's to preserve the original tires

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago